Thanks for the samples and the note that things do not seem sharp in the distance. This has been my issue with my Sigma 18-50/2.8. Now I know I don't need to drop $500 more dollars for the Canon 
WT21 Goldmember 1,319 posts Joined Feb 2008 More info | May 18, 2009 20:28 | #31 Thanks for the samples and the note that things do not seem sharp in the distance. This has been my issue with my Sigma 18-50/2.8. Now I know I don't need to drop $500 more dollars for the Canon 6D: 50, 85, 28-75, 70-210USM, 430EXii.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 19, 2009 18:13 | #32 Got it back from Canon today and it's perfect (as far as I can tell so far). Per service details: A part in the auto focus system was out of position and did not operate properly. Also replaced the IS assembly. Adjusted center/tilt/focus and cleaned like new. VERY happy with the turnaround time and service!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1538 guests, 170 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
