Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 08 May 2009 (Friday) 18:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Struggled with Wedding Reception Photos

 
dcsmith40D
Senior Member
Avatar
543 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta
     
May 08, 2009 18:13 |  #1

I used the 50 1.8 in order to try and get decent shutter speed. I struggled. I posted this picture in hopes someone could tell me if the ghosting on this photo is due to camera shake or too slow of shutter speed or something else.

Thanks

David


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II

David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,437 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4529
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 08, 2009 18:17 |  #2

The EXIF shows 1/30 f/2.2 (you could have used the faster apeture setting) With a bunch of dancing guests, who are maybe doing a typical fast moving dance that young adults do, it is no wonder it is blurred from the ambient light being recorded with the slow shutter speed. Besides DOF is very shallow with that wide aperture, another cause of blur of a different type.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dcsmith40D
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
543 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta
     
May 08, 2009 18:26 |  #3

Wilt wrote in post #7884994 (external link)
The EXIF shows 1/30 f/2.2 (you could have used the faster apeture setting) With a bunch of dancing guests, who are maybe doing a typical fast moving dance that young adults do, it is no wonder it is blurred from the ambient light being recorded with the slow shutter speed. Besides DOF is very shallow with that wide aperture, another cause of blur of a different type.

Yes, I could have used 1.8. I was worried about getting any depth of field. I know that there has to be something to make my photos better. You did point out one of them. What about the 580 ex II? I set it on ettl and the camera on av. Should I have gone manual on both the camera and the flash? I was not the photographer, but, the father of the bride. I often thought if this man gets a lot of decent photos, I'm impressed. He by the way was using 5D with 24-70. The 24-70 is what I have been wanting next. I don't see how it would have helped though.


Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II

David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,437 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4529
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 08, 2009 18:30 |  #4

dcsmith40D wrote in post #7885032 (external link)
Yes, I could have used 1.8. I was worried about getting any depth of field. I know that there has to be something to make my photos better. You did point out one of them. What about the 580 ex II? I set it on ettl and the camera on av. Should I have gone manual on both the camera and the flash? I was not the photographer, but, the father of the bride. I often thought if this man gets a lot of decent photos, I'm impressed. He by the way was using 5D with 24-70. The 24-70 is what I have been wanting next. I don't see how it would have helped though.

In AV mode with an f/1.8 lens and low light, your Av will doom you to the Canon engineers' incompetance at choosing too slow of a shutter speed for the moving subjects you have...ergo Manual setting of camera will allow some controlled degree of ambient light capture while limiting the motion blur (at the expense of background being darker). OTOH, focusing the viewer's eyes on the young lady in focus, while throwing the other characters into a darker background would be nice for that shot!

An exceedingly poor edit done in about 10 seconds, just to give the idea of darkened background...

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/IMG_9519_filtered.jpg

The choice of flash itself will not improve background blur issues in Av mode.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dcsmith40D
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
543 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta
     
May 08, 2009 18:43 |  #5

Am I understanding you to say that I should shot @ 1.8 and meter for shutter speed and leave the flash on ettl? Or, would I expose underexposed and allow the flash to make up the difference?

Thanks for the Help.

David


Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II

David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,437 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4529
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 08, 2009 19:57 |  #6

dcsmith40D wrote in post #7885106 (external link)
Am I understanding you to say that I should shot @ 1.8 and meter for shutter speed and leave the flash on ettl? Or, would I expose underexposed and allow the flash to make up the difference?

Thanks for the Help.

David

The general technique is to pick your aperture (for DOF control reasons), have the camera suggest what shutter speed, and increase (less light) the shutter speed by -1EV, put the flash into ETTL, aim focus and shoot.

Of course you have to consider if the combo of f/stop and shutter speed are giving you the right degree of motion stopping needed, the right brightness compared to the main subject, the right DOF control, etc etc etc. That is where the ISO value becomes yet another control element to consider.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eelnoraa
Goldmember
1,798 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
     
May 08, 2009 20:05 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #7

I agree with Wilt. Basically, Av is not the best mode to use for this kind of situation. Try using M, set SS to at least 1/100s for your 50mm lens (to minimize camera shake), set aperture value to f/4 for whatever you think you need the DOF to be. Witht this, the background exposure will be fixed, your e-ttl canon flash will adjust the power automatically for the foreground.


5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dcsmith40D
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
543 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta
     
May 08, 2009 20:10 |  #8

eelnoraa wrote in post #7885441 (external link)
I agree with Wilt. Basically, Av is not the best mode to use for this kind of situation. Try using M, set SS to at least 1/100s for your 50mm lens (to minimize camera shake), set aperture value to f/4 for whatever you think you need the DOF to be. Witht this, the background exposure will be fixed, your e-ttl canon flash will adjust the power automatically for the foreground.

That is the part I haven't gotten. Tell me if I am understanding you wrong.

You are saying that even though I had set my manual controls grossly underexposed, the e-ttl will make the necessary adjustments to expose the subject right?


Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II

David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,437 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4529
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 08, 2009 20:41 |  #9

dcsmith40D wrote in post #7885454 (external link)
That is the part I haven't gotten. Tell me if I am understanding you wrong.

You are saying that even though I had set my manual controls grossly underexposed, the e-ttl will make the necessary adjustments to expose the subject right?

Precisely

The exposure which uses available light and flash is truly TWO in one. You control one part independently of the other part. They share some common elements of control (aperture, ISO) but they have independent parts (shutter speed below the max flash speed makes no change to flash, but changes ambient contribution). EC affects auto mode, or aligning the manual indicator to the left of '0' controls ambient, FEC controls flash balance.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,288 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Struggled with Wedding Reception Photos
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
952 guests, 183 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.