I used the 50 1.8 in order to try and get decent shutter speed. I struggled. I posted this picture in hopes someone could tell me if the ghosting on this photo is due to camera shake or too slow of shutter speed or something else.
Thanks
David
dcsmith40D Senior Member 543 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Atlanta More info | May 08, 2009 18:13 | #1 I used the 50 1.8 in order to try and get decent shutter speed. I struggled. I posted this picture in hopes someone could tell me if the ghosting on this photo is due to camera shake or too slow of shutter speed or something else. Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 08, 2009 18:17 | #2 The EXIF shows 1/30 f/2.2 (you could have used the faster apeture setting) With a bunch of dancing guests, who are maybe doing a typical fast moving dance that young adults do, it is no wonder it is blurred from the ambient light being recorded with the slow shutter speed. Besides DOF is very shallow with that wide aperture, another cause of blur of a different type. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 08, 2009 18:26 | #3 Wilt wrote in post #7884994 The EXIF shows 1/30 f/2.2 (you could have used the faster apeture setting) With a bunch of dancing guests, who are maybe doing a typical fast moving dance that young adults do, it is no wonder it is blurred from the ambient light being recorded with the slow shutter speed. Besides DOF is very shallow with that wide aperture, another cause of blur of a different type. Yes, I could have used 1.8. I was worried about getting any depth of field. I know that there has to be something to make my photos better. You did point out one of them. What about the 580 ex II? I set it on ettl and the camera on av. Should I have gone manual on both the camera and the flash? I was not the photographer, but, the father of the bride. I often thought if this man gets a lot of decent photos, I'm impressed. He by the way was using 5D with 24-70. The 24-70 is what I have been wanting next. I don't see how it would have helped though. Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 08, 2009 18:30 | #4 dcsmith40D wrote in post #7885032 Yes, I could have used 1.8. I was worried about getting any depth of field. I know that there has to be something to make my photos better. You did point out one of them. What about the 580 ex II? I set it on ettl and the camera on av. Should I have gone manual on both the camera and the flash? I was not the photographer, but, the father of the bride. I often thought if this man gets a lot of decent photos, I'm impressed. He by the way was using 5D with 24-70. The 24-70 is what I have been wanting next. I don't see how it would have helped though. In AV mode with an f/1.8 lens and low light, your Av will doom you to the Canon engineers' incompetance at choosing too slow of a shutter speed for the moving subjects you have...ergo Manual setting of camera will allow some controlled degree of ambient light capture while limiting the motion blur (at the expense of background being darker). OTOH, focusing the viewer's eyes on the young lady in focus, while throwing the other characters into a darker background would be nice for that shot! The choice of flash itself will not improve background blur issues in Av mode. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 08, 2009 18:43 | #5 Am I understanding you to say that I should shot @ 1.8 and meter for shutter speed and leave the flash on ettl? Or, would I expose underexposed and allow the flash to make up the difference? Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 08, 2009 19:57 | #6 dcsmith40D wrote in post #7885106 Am I understanding you to say that I should shot @ 1.8 and meter for shutter speed and leave the flash on ettl? Or, would I expose underexposed and allow the flash to make up the difference? Thanks for the Help. David The general technique is to pick your aperture (for DOF control reasons), have the camera suggest what shutter speed, and increase (less light) the shutter speed by -1EV, put the flash into ETTL, aim focus and shoot. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eelnoraa Goldmember 1,798 posts Likes: 37 Joined May 2007 More info | I agree with Wilt. Basically, Av is not the best mode to use for this kind of situation. Try using M, set SS to at least 1/100s for your 50mm lens (to minimize camera shake), set aperture value to f/4 for whatever you think you need the DOF to be. Witht this, the background exposure will be fixed, your e-ttl canon flash will adjust the power automatically for the foreground. 5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 08, 2009 20:10 | #8 eelnoraa wrote in post #7885441 I agree with Wilt. Basically, Av is not the best mode to use for this kind of situation. Try using M, set SS to at least 1/100s for your 50mm lens (to minimize camera shake), set aperture value to f/4 for whatever you think you need the DOF to be. Witht this, the background exposure will be fixed, your e-ttl canon flash will adjust the power automatically for the foreground. That is the part I haven't gotten. Tell me if I am understanding you wrong. Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 08, 2009 20:41 | #9 dcsmith40D wrote in post #7885454 That is the part I haven't gotten. Tell me if I am understanding you wrong. You are saying that even though I had set my manual controls grossly underexposed, the e-ttl will make the necessary adjustments to expose the subject right? Precisely You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 952 guests, 183 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||