It's a great lens for the price when people don't have dispensible incomes to buy L lenses with which in turn take bad pictures, with bad AF.
| POLL: "How do feel about The Fifty" |
It's a great lens | 80 32.4% |
It's a piece of crap | 25 10.1% |
It's all I could afford | 22 8.9% |
It has Canon on it, so it must be good | 8 3.2% |
It's soft wide open | 29 11.7% |
The AF is terrible | 52 21.1% |
Mine is tack sharp and the AF is great | 31 12.6% |
CALImagery Goldmember 3,375 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 Location: O-H More info | May 08, 2009 19:51 | #16 It's a great lens for the price when people don't have dispensible incomes to buy L lenses with which in turn take bad pictures, with bad AF. Christian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimG I feel thoroughly satisfied 12,255 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Australia. More info | May 08, 2009 19:54 | #17 Great lens for the price, mine was very sharp wide open... shame about the very dodgy AF. Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios.com.au
LOG IN TO REPLY |
versedmb Goldmember 4,448 posts Likes: 4 Joined Apr 2006 More info | May 08, 2009 20:00 | #18 Its really not that bad; check out these.. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 08, 2009 20:03 | #19 I had one for about 6 months. I found that I simply wasn't using it because I already had a tamron 28-75. To me it was the awkward focal length. I did use it some for portraits but found myself having to manually focus it. And manual focus with me in charge is a chancy thing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fiorano94 Senior Member 376 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Ohio/South Carolina More info | May 08, 2009 20:47 | #20 It's a piece of crap and I love it. I thought about selling it, but I just love it too much. Some full frame, some L.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotonPhil Goldmember 1,763 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Capturing Photons in Wisconsin More info | May 08, 2009 20:50 | #21 It's the best little engineering disaster this side of the Yugo. But considering it was designed by children playing on the CAD computer at the Canon employee picnic... it's not THAT bad. Bodies: SONY A850 / Pentax K100D / D70 (18-55VR, 55-200)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KarlJohnston Cream of the Crop 9,334 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2008 More info | May 08, 2009 20:58 | #22 Permanent banAll lenses are soft wide open. Adventurous Photographer, Writer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | May 08, 2009 21:00 | #23 maybe all your lenses are soft wide open http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fiorano94 Senior Member 376 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Ohio/South Carolina More info | May 08, 2009 21:02 | #24 |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,734 posts Likes: 4067 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | May 08, 2009 21:05 | #25 I'm not a fan of the 50 f/1.8 even with the low cost. I would save the $$ and get the 1.4. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jimmer411 Thank god Im green. 866 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Pacific, WA More info | May 08, 2009 21:05 | #26 I sold my 24-70L because I cant put my 50mm down. Its that good. Even if it focuses in random places randomly sometimes. 5D3 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 24-70 f/2.8L II | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 430EX | YN-568EX II | YN-622c | YN-622-TX |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jmoney916 Senior Member 284 posts Joined Apr 2009 Location: Atlanta More info |
CountryBoy THREAD STARTER "Tired of Goldmember label" 5,168 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Okie More info | May 08, 2009 21:28 | #28 Very true Ed, even my zooms are sharper then the Nifty, wide open. jmoney916 wrote in post #7885714 The AF sucks, but for under $100 new, you can't beat its quality and speed. I love mine. Having to stop the fifty down, makes it a slower lens. More like like a 2.8 lens. Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 08, 2009 21:52 | #29 I had a older 50 1.8 when I had my 40d, it wasnt sharp at all wide open. I just got another one a few days ago to test my 5d and I dont know if its the camera or the lens but this sucker is sharp from wide open. | Canon 50D | Canon 17-55mm F2.8 IS | Canon 50mm F1.8 | Canon 60mm Macro |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kay188 Senior Member 825 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | May 08, 2009 22:07 | #30 fiorano94 wrote in post #7885612 It's a piece of crap and I love it. I thought about selling it, but I just love it too much. Same here man. I hate it so much. So much dust inside. Ricoh GRD4 | Canon 1Ds, 1D, 1D2, 1D2n| Canon XTi | Tokina 11-16 F/2.8 | Canon 16-35L I | Canon 24 F/2.8 | Canon 35 F/2 | Canon 50 F/1.8 I | Canon 135L | Sigma 24-70 EX DG Macro | Sigma 70-200 F/2.8 APO EX DG | Sigma 30 F/1.4 |Sigma 50 F/1.4 |Sigma & Kenko 1.4x TC| Canon 580EX II | Sigma EF-500 Super | 2x Vivitar 285HV | RF-602 Triggers |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1227 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||