Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 09 May 2009 (Saturday) 16:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What is your keeper ratio?

 
omer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,273 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Likes: 422
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Israel
     
May 09, 2009 16:54 |  #1

I just calculated mine and it is around 1:60
(keeper for me are ones I will proudly show)
It has to qualify as both technically and esthetically well done.


_______________
My Flickr (old) http://www.flickr.com/​photos/omfoto/ (external link)
_______________

R6 | 80D | 7D | M6 |RF24-105 STM|RF35 1.8| EF-S 15-85 |EF 70-300 L |Sig 150-600 C| Sig 10-20 | 50 1.8 |100 2.8 macro|28 F2.8 | efs24| efm 15-45| 270EX | 430EXII |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
May 09, 2009 16:58 |  #2

You'll find that your definition of "keeper" will change over time.

I have plenty of shots that are well-exposed and well-focused, but I don't class them as "keepers" because they have little in the way of asthetic appeal.

As I get better technically, I get more self critical in the art of photography.


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Persephone
Goldmember
Avatar
1,122 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: CA
     
May 09, 2009 17:05 |  #3

It depends on what, as well.

Everyday photography has a keep ratio of about 95%, if not higher. I don't throw away any of that photography, but I don't choose any of it, either; it doesn't go anywhere.

Recently, I went on a week-long trip to cover a class working on houses in New Orleans. The keep ratio was only about 25% there (about 500/2500 photos taken).


Gear list
"Do you think it was my choice to wed a man I did not love? Live a life I did not choose? I was betrayed by the very gods that once saw me as their own. But no more." - Περσεφόνη (external link), God of War

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
omer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,273 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Likes: 422
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Israel
     
May 09, 2009 17:17 |  #4

I am actually asking about the ration of picture you will proudly show
It has to qualify as both technically and esthetically well done.


_______________
My Flickr (old) http://www.flickr.com/​photos/omfoto/ (external link)
_______________

R6 | 80D | 7D | M6 |RF24-105 STM|RF35 1.8| EF-S 15-85 |EF 70-300 L |Sig 150-600 C| Sig 10-20 | 50 1.8 |100 2.8 macro|28 F2.8 | efs24| efm 15-45| 270EX | 430EXII |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
May 09, 2009 17:25 |  #5

The definition of keepers change by person, and within a person by time, as Pete the comedian said. Some people i know will show 100% of shots to everyone, even those shots that would have been deleted in my library, not even flagged for deletion. Others i know don't show any photos, and with good reason sometimes. It also varies on if you are pro,semi pro, amateur, less than amateur, in the order of least shown to most.

Personally, of the non-commissioned photographs I take, I can divide them into two categories: public events, personal events. Of the public events, I release between 2% and 20% to my website, with an average of about 15%. For personal events, I generally release 40-80%, but I also take a lot less photographs, often 10:1 for public vs private events. For commissioned photographs, I release an average of 1%, with about 10% for certain non-exclusive events shown, and 0% anything shot specifically for the client with exclusivity, only the client can see those.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
May 09, 2009 17:56 |  #6

omer wrote in post #7889837 (external link)
I am actually asking about the ration of picture you will proudly show

I don't know enough math to find that small of a ratio. I do post a lot of shots, but many, maybe even most are just part of a story I like to tell of a bird. And not all are even technically correct. It's like taking one frame out of a Peanuts cartoon in the Sunday paper. Nothing special by themselves, but worth a laugh or shows some odd behavior in aggregate. :)


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apple
Member
Avatar
107 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Missouri, USA
     
May 09, 2009 21:01 as a reply to  @ canonloader's post |  #7

Check the signature line for my average...:)


I dream of Heaven.
My cameras dream of "L".
photograph/snapshot ratio 1/250 and I'm okay with it.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mastertech01
Goldmember
Avatar
2,098 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2007
Location: LAWTON OKLAHOMA USA
     
May 09, 2009 21:04 |  #8

I think it was a lot higher when I was shooting film and had to pay for every shot.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
c-line
Member
91 posts
Joined Dec 2008
     
May 09, 2009 21:51 as a reply to  @ mastertech01's post |  #9

About 1/30




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CAL ­ Imagery
Goldmember
Avatar
3,375 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
Location: O-H
     
May 09, 2009 21:59 |  #10

mastertech01 wrote in post #7890696 (external link)
I think it was a lot higher when I was shooting film and had to pay for every shot.

My good pictures with film are nearly 100%. The only pictures, if any, I delete are OOF. Storage is cheap.


Christian

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,439 posts
Gallery: 622 photos
Likes: 3076
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
May 09, 2009 22:06 as a reply to  @ CAL Imagery's post |  #11

It depends to be honest

If I'm out shooting birds? Generally not too high because of duplicates or missed focus...

Flowers and landscapes and anything else is much higher, I can nail it with one, but i usually take 2 or 3 just in case the wind moves the subject [Its happened]


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nightcat
Goldmember
4,533 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2008
     
May 09, 2009 22:39 as a reply to  @ KenjiS's post |  #12

This is an interesting question. I learned a long time ago, if you got 5 great shots today, it doesn't matter if you took a total of 10 pictures or 300 to get those 5. Bottom line, you got 5 great shots! I know someone at work who said they have a keeper rate of 98%. I finally saw their collection, and out of 3000 kept shots, about 100-150 that were very good and about 10 were really outstanding! Some folks just like to fill up their hard drive.

I'll keep maybe 1 of every 12-15 or so attempts. As far as pictures that I would proudly show, that qualify as both technically and esthetically well done.... maybe 1 of every 40-60.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigcountry
Goldmember
Avatar
4,518 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 150
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
     
May 09, 2009 23:09 |  #13

98%


Louisville Kentucky Wedding Photographer (external link)
Travel the World and Photograph (external link)
Find me on Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mbellot
"My dog ate my title"
Avatar
3,365 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Jul 2005
Location: The Miami of Canada - Chicago!
     
May 09, 2009 23:31 as a reply to  @ bigcountry's post |  #14

Sorry, but division by zero is not possible...

:p

It has to qualify as both technically and esthetically well done.

Seriously, by your definition I would put my keeper ratio in the 1/500 to 1/1000 range out of thew camera.

Cropping and PP probably pushes that in to the 1/50 to 1/10 range. I shoot a lot of event stuff, so esthetically well done at capture is tough.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
itzcryptic
Goldmember
1,174 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati
     
May 09, 2009 23:33 |  #15

I "keep" probably 98%. I only print maybe 1 in 1000 so far, but about 10-20% get "shown" to others that I am not embarrassed to show. Probably about 5% that I am actually proud of.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,478 views & 0 likes for this thread, 34 members have posted to it.
What is your keeper ratio?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1465 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.