I've got CS3 and have heard of a number of "issues" with CS4 and don't really see that much in the release to get excited about. So the question is if you upgraded are you seeing that it was worth it? Would you do it again?
Thanks!
kenyc Cream of the Crop More info | May 10, 2009 12:03 | #1 I've got CS3 and have heard of a number of "issues" with CS4 and don't really see that much in the release to get excited about. So the question is if you upgraded are you seeing that it was worth it? Would you do it again? Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasP505 "brain damaged old guy" 5,566 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: New Mexico, USA More info | May 10, 2009 13:31 | #2 I mainly updated to get the improved Bridge CS4, not Photoshop CS4. PS CS4 offers me no value over CS3. I still the rest of the Design Standard CS3 Suite. Chas P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
condyk Africa's #1 Tour Guide 20,887 posts Likes: 22 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Birmingham, UK More info | May 10, 2009 13:40 | #3 I have recently upgraded from CS2 and I feel it has been well worthwhile. When I was checking things the concensus seemed to have been that upgrading from CS3 was probably not worthwhile. Bridge is much better too. https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1203740
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 10, 2009 14:02 | #4 Thanks Chas and Condyk. I appreciate the input. I use it primarily for straightforward photo processing (which is why I'm asking here in a photo group) nothing too fancy. Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CALImagery Goldmember 3,375 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 Location: O-H More info | May 10, 2009 15:47 | #5 I like UI more and a few things here and there. I would look at what Adobe specifically updated/added to make it worth the money. I like CS4 a lot more than CS3, but YMMV. Christian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 10, 2009 16:54 | #6 Thanks Christian. Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S-S frustrating simple something 8,755 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 More info | May 10, 2009 17:01 | #7 i'm staying with CS3 for now...i use lightroom too but photoshop is my 'after raw' processing tool so i use both equally. i also use illustrator and indesign, and dreamweaver - but they all do just what i need them to already so no need to upgrade yet
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | May 10, 2009 17:06 | #8 If you don't use bridge then don't bother upgrading. All CS4 does it slow things down and spoil the UI. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 10, 2009 17:12 | #9 Seems like a love/hate with the new UI... Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CALImagery Goldmember 3,375 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 Location: O-H More info | May 10, 2009 19:36 | #10 kenyc wrote in post #7894641 Seems like a love/hate with the new UI... It is vastly different. I used CS3 a little bit before getting CS4, so I've learned most of PS on CS4. It's one of those things that people get used to a certain UI and another comes along and those people hate it. However, I find it faster to use than CS3. There are a lot of minor changes, but as most people will say, the UI is the biggest change. If I couldn't get a student discount, I never would have boughten CS4 as it wasn't a necessity, but rather a luxury of being a student. However, I will use more Adobe products now than I thought I was going to use when I purchased the master collection (which I doubt few, if any, people buy it unless they can get a bad student discount). Christian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
condyk Africa's #1 Tour Guide 20,887 posts Likes: 22 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Birmingham, UK More info | May 11, 2009 00:36 | #11 On the interface I wasn't attached the the old one so haven't worried about the new one. Seems to me not that different, or maybe it's just at my level of usage it seems pretty much the same. Most of us use lots of different software every day so a few changes in one app. isn't really a big deal IMO. It's transitional. I also find it quicker ... maybe because I use x64. I dunno! https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1203740
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scottes Trigger Man - POTN Retired 12,842 posts Likes: 10 Joined Nov 2003 Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA More info | May 11, 2009 05:41 | #12 I feel CS4 is *very* worthwhile for the 64-bit support, but for someone who doesn't run 64-bit then I can imagine it's not very worthwhile. You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 11, 2009 06:05 | #13 Thanks Christian, Condyk, and Scottes. It's looking like I may just stick with CS3 for a bit longer. Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stsva Cream of the Crop More info | May 11, 2009 12:03 | #14 kenyc- Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 11, 2009 12:27 | #15 Yeah, that's an idea stsva, but I didn't want to take the chance screwing up my current install of cs3. I'm got a pretty speedy machine bought last year primarily to do audio and graphics work so don't think I'd have performance issues. I'm more interested in whether it has improvements that are helpful in photography image processing and so far it sounds like the answer is not really.... Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1301 guests, 114 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||