Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 15 May 2009 (Friday) 06:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Overexposed effect

 
rlineberg
Member
168 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2008
     
May 15, 2009 06:59 |  #1

I was trying something new and I thought maybe an overexposed effect would help this photograph. What do you think?

Before:

IMAGE: http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g300/rlineberg/lyd.jpg

After:
IMAGE: http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g300/rlineberg/lydedit.jpg

5D Mark II, 24-105 f/4, 580EXII, 2 Lumpro 160's.
website: http://robertlineberg.​smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snapdragon43
Member
49 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Arkansas
     
May 15, 2009 07:59 |  #2

I like this photo. And I really like the way her eyes are brought out by the pp .....but to me the really bright skin and shirt is a little distracting. If you could tone down the effect in those areas I think it would be awesome. By the way I checked out your smugmug account and you have some really nice landscape shots!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Smad728
Senior Member
Avatar
376 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Fishkill, New York
     
May 15, 2009 08:17 |  #3

Not feeling it. The picture that it. The PP..eh.


Sean.Devine.Photograph​y (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14912
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 15, 2009 10:00 |  #4

You could probably get the skin, the wall, and the shirt to have some pop with a simple levels adjustment




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
charl1e
Member
Avatar
246 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
May 15, 2009 20:50 |  #5

PP doesn't work, her shirt is way too bright and it doesn't make the image any better


Canon 5D Mark III, 35mm f1.4L, 70-200mm f2.8L, 50mm f1.4, 85mm f1.8, 50mm f1.8, Sigma 24-35mm f2 ART
Add me on Facebook! (external link)
Charlie Chang Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
korrektor
Goldmember
Avatar
4,908 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Moscow, Russia
     
May 15, 2009 23:04 |  #6

so... since PP doesn't work for anyone including me... How about verexposing the model ... selectively? This is when I would call my trusty dodge tool.

well here's the edit... went and extra yard with this one... sorry :) please excuse the blotchy spot on her face (right side)

photobucket compression... or... just my bad :)

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v636/korr123/lyd-1.jpg

WEBSITE http://mikhaylovphoto.​com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Smad728
Senior Member
Avatar
376 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Fishkill, New York
     
May 17, 2009 16:22 |  #7

Much better.


Sean.Devine.Photograph​y (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
srika
Goldmember
Avatar
3,901 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 248
Joined Aug 2004
Location: chicago
     
May 17, 2009 16:42 |  #8

I overexpose in PP once in a while when it seems fitting. In this example it basically (and quickly I might add - this is one click in Lightroom) erases all of the unflattering characteristics of the SOOC shot and makes it an "artsy" shot.

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3378/3539643671_40ee9d6f7e_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/delobbo/3539643​671/  (external link)

raѕιdel ѕlιĸa f l i c k r (external link) . p σ r t f σ l í σ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
korrektor
Goldmember
Avatar
4,908 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Moscow, Russia
     
May 17, 2009 17:51 |  #9

^^^^^
I think this is still too much overexposure.... makes my eyes hurt a little. maybe not that much?


WEBSITE http://mikhaylovphoto.​com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
superstes
Goldmember
Avatar
1,376 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern France
     
May 17, 2009 18:45 |  #10

rlineberg wrote in post #7925701 (external link)
I was trying something new and I thought maybe an overexposed effect would help this photograph. What do you think?

Have you tried an high contrast effect rather than just trying to over expose it.

With practice they can look cool, not everyone's taste (I like em) but cool all the same.

Steve




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
srika
Goldmember
Avatar
3,901 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 248
Joined Aug 2004
Location: chicago
     
May 17, 2009 22:48 |  #11

korrektor wrote in post #7939152 (external link)
^^^^^
I think this is still too much overexposure.... makes my eyes hurt a little. maybe not that much?

you're entitled to feeling that way. regarding this shot, it "flew" rather well so I personally think it is "OK".


raѕιdel ѕlιĸa f l i c k r (external link) . p σ r t f σ l í σ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
srika
Goldmember
Avatar
3,901 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 248
Joined Aug 2004
Location: chicago
     
May 17, 2009 22:49 |  #12

superstes wrote in post #7939409 (external link)
Have you tried an high contrast effect rather than just trying to over expose it.

With practice they can look cool, not everyone's taste (I like em) but cool all the same.

Steve

yeah that's a good technique too, used in moderation. and, agreed on your last sentence, definitely talking about personal preference here. not gonna be everyone's cup of tea.


raѕιdel ѕlιĸa f l i c k r (external link) . p σ r t f σ l í σ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
srika
Goldmember
Avatar
3,901 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 248
Joined Aug 2004
Location: chicago
     
May 18, 2009 00:16 |  #13

btw here's the Lightroom preset, if you wanna try it out.

http://srika.com/img/o​verexposeR3.lrtemplate (external link)


raѕιdel ѕlιĸa f l i c k r (external link) . p σ r t f σ l í σ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbone
Senior Member
279 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
May 18, 2009 00:30 |  #14

yes the third one is much better.


Note: This post may contain misspellings, grammatical errors, disorganized sentence structure, or may entirely lack a coherent theme. These elements are natural to the process of writing, and will only add to the overall beauty of the post.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
trentchau
Goldmember
Avatar
1,065 posts
Likes: 67
Joined Nov 2008
Location: atlanta
     
May 18, 2009 00:31 |  #15

try this.

copy layer

guissian blur (what ever you want)

than change the copied layer to screen.


Photographer and Photography instructor in Atlanta.
See some of my work at http://trentchau.500px​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,796 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Overexposed effect
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1114 guests, 174 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.