http://cgi.ebay.com …iewitem=&salenotsupported
Talked to the seller. He says nothing wrong, original shutter, and a little under 50k clicks.
Too good to be true?
He also has very good ratings
blackmatch456 Senior Member 268 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2009 More info | May 15, 2009 19:24 | #1 http://cgi.ebay.com …iewitem=&salenotsupported
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 15, 2009 19:27 | #2 I can believe it. It is an older camera(still better then most newer bodies), but I think it is lacking a charger. If it is, that is another $340 to add onto that unless you already own one. Besides, there is still plenty of time to go before it sells. I am willing to bet that the price will be closer to $900-1100. "I work from awkwardness. By that I mean I don't arrange things. If I stand in front of something, instead of arranging it, I arrange myself" -Diane Arbus
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonloader Cream of the Crop  More info | May 15, 2009 19:29 | #3 Dude, there is no charger, no box, no cables, no manuals. Yes, it's a good price, but you need the charger and they cost like $500 in themselves. "So now your $700 camera is up to $1200 Mitch- ____...^.^...____
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 15, 2009 19:31 | #4 WHAT?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mastertech01 Goldmember  2,098 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2007 Location: LAWTON OKLAHOMA USA More info | May 15, 2009 19:39 | #5 I would find out the actual serial number on it. The picture sure looks like it has a bogus serial number for a 1D MKII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonloader Cream of the Crop More info | May 15, 2009 19:39 | #6 I just found one at Amazon for $332, on sale, but the regular MSRP is $541. And I have no idea why. It seems like a perfect thing to pirate and sell for $39.95 out of Hong Kong. What could be so hard about making a battery charger? Mitch- ____...^.^...____
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 15, 2009 19:44 | #7 Jesus.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stathunter "I am no one really"  5,659 posts Likes: 60 Joined Aug 2006 Location: California & Michigan More info | May 15, 2009 19:45 | #8 If you have a charger - and extra batteries you are good to go. The batteries are $130 --- Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mastertech01 Goldmember 2,098 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2007 Location: LAWTON OKLAHOMA USA More info | May 15, 2009 19:48 | #9 canonloader wrote in post #7929673 I just found one at Amazon for $332, on sale, but the regular MSRP is $541. And I have no idea why. It seems like a perfect thing to pirate and sell for $39.95 out of Hong Kong. What could be so hard about making a battery charger? Ive seen cheap aftermarket ones, but they only have one battery cable and they dont do the refresh operation. They just charge one battery at a time..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sheawyatt Goldmember  1,412 posts Likes: 30 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Victoria, BC More info | May 15, 2009 19:49 | #10 Yeah, the lack of charger is a deal breaker. EOS R5 | RF 15-35 f/2.8 | RF 24-70 f/2.8 | RF 70-200 f/4 | EF 400 f/4 DO II | EF 1.4x III |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mastertech01 Goldmember 2,098 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2007 Location: LAWTON OKLAHOMA USA More info | May 15, 2009 19:55 | #11 Just checking the past couple weeks on Ebay, several used ones sold for between 128.00 and 160.00. I would certainly adjust the amount willing to pay by at least 150.00 just for that, and then more for cables and etc you wont be getting. Doesnt look like you will get software, box, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fanorama Member 209 posts Joined May 2009 More info | May 15, 2009 19:57 | #12 yeah! you can buy one in amazon too, its hard to buy a camera with no charger..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JackLiu Senior Member 570 posts Joined Apr 2009 Location: Ventura County, Calif., USA More info | May 15, 2009 20:50 | #13 About a year ago there was a (Hong Kong) seller on EBay who was clearing out his supply of third party brand NP-E3 battery chargers for a little over US$100 ea but the name escapes me at this time. "Love life and life will love you back. Love people and they will love you back." Arthur Rubinstein.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 15, 2009 21:41 | #14 how does this set up sound:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
brianch Goldmember  1,387 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | May 15, 2009 21:43 | #15 blackmatch456 wrote in post #7930218 how does this set up sound: 40d 70-200mm f4 sigma 24-60mm f2.8 50mm f1.8 300mm f4 IS (or should I do the 400 f5.6 non-is? for sports and wildlife) 17-40mm f4 sounds good. instead of buying the sigma 24-60 and 17-40 get the EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS. On a cropped body I would get the 300mm f/4L IS instead of the 400mm f/5.6 Brian C - Alpha Auto Spa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2027 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
