WWYD: Complimenting my zooms w/ primes

Hi all - I have my zooms and current bodies sorted for the immediate future. I would like to add a FF body down the road but my crop 30D's are still delivering and aren't ready to be replaced just yet.

I'm currently working with the 30D's, 17-40L, Tamron 28-75 F/2.8, 70-200 F/2.8 ISL, and 100mm F/2.8 Macro.

I am considering letting the macro go due to lack of use, and I want to add a high quality fast prime to my bag. I have the opportunity to pickup some top end primes used locally at good prices, and I need some advice. I want to choose to best option for my crops today that will also work for me down the road on FF. My initial gut reaction was the classic 35L / 85L combo, (this is because I seem to favor around 20-24mm and 50mm on my walkaround zooms) however I'm also keen on the 135L. Here's the deals I have available locally (from reputable photogs in the area).

24L MKI - approximately $750 USD. Signs of wear on the lens itself, but optics are perfect. No box or accessories other than caps/hood.

85L MKII - approximately $1650-1750 USD, mint condition with all boxes/accessories.

My thoughts are that I can sell the macro, and use some savings to do one of the following:

1. Buy a brand new 35L and wait on the rest.
2. Buy the used 24L and search for a good deal on a used or new 135L.
3. Splurge on the 85L and wait on the rest.

My shooting is a bit all over the place (as is this post, sorry!), you can visit my site (portfolio) or flickr below for a sense of what I'll be using the lens(es) for. I must say that I am not a portrait photographer which makes me hesitant about the 85/135, however they do seem to be versatile. I have shot a number of weddings in the past which I see these being useful for, but I'm really buying for personal shooting/wants.

Thanks!

thats a great deal on the 24. I would get it. If you dont like it you can sell it for a profit.
135L on a crop? good for outdoor shooting. Its long. the 2.8IS is so good, that you may find you prefer the very useful IS, and the zoom versatility vs one stop of light and size of 135. thats what happened to me. bought it and sold it.
I own the 35 1.4, sigma 50 1.4, and 85 1.2, and am extremely happy with all 3. the sigma is the best bang for the buck, and a fantastic lens. and to give you a perspective, I own the canon L 2.8 zooms from 16-200.
my 2 cents.

Thanks Kevin. I know it's a great deal on the 24L, that makes it hard to turn it down. I can definitely see the 24/35 being a daily focal length versus the longer lenses. You may be right, the 70-200 is just that good that it may make the 135 redundant.

My other option would be to rock the 24L and keep the 100mm macro for a longer prime, leaving no budget for anything else at this time. I could then look at filling the gap with something else down the road. I was an early adopter of the Sigma 50mm F/1.4, unfortunately my copy was abysmal.

Having the same thing in mind here. I'm not much of a portrait photographer either. I'd like to go farther with landscape and candids though. Maybe doing a little product shooting now and then. I had thoughts of picking up a FF body next rather than getting a UWA. Seems to me the 17-40 would have you covered on the wider side on a FF body until you decided to add wide primes later on. If it were me I'd think about adding the 135L and maybe 85L.

Dorman, bummer about your sigma. I have to say, having a body with microfocus adjustment, does make a difference.
Dont get me wrong about 135, as I thought it was a stellar lens, it is as good as people say. However, for shooting people, I find I need between 1/60 to 1/125 second to stop their motion. on a cropper, you need 1/200 second to stop your hand motion with 135. Hence I found the IS more than compensates for the one stop of light in the focal range.
85 1.2, is in a different league of course. Its shorter focal length makes it more hand holdable. its 2.5 stops faster than 2.8 zoom, and the bokeh is out of this world.