How durable are the D series cameras?

I have a new 50D, and while I know it's not as rugged as one of the old film cameras, just how tender is it?

I read that dust is the arch-enemy. Anything else in particular?

Thanks for all the help, you guys. )

Dust is the arch-enemy of all digital SLRs. And water too, while we're at it.

Anything other than the Rebel series is very well built, but some are built more like Shermans than others. I don't think anyone worries about how robust their camera is for lines greater than the Rebels.

Rumor and second hand knowledge are bad things to base statements on.

I've been shooting horse events with the "D" series for the last six years. Bangs and bumps, a plenty without any functional damage.

If you are going to cover frontline war activities, then you might consider other gear.

If you're talking about old FD mount cameras, like an AE-1 then they're definitely more "tough". Dust isn't a problem, water to a lesser extent, and it can take bumps with no problems. Also no need for a battery (if you can shoot without a meter). But as other has said, the digitals are ever bit as good as the film cams in terms of ruggedness.

You guys! Alright for the mind-ease. Into the South Carolina swamps for that 50K on the Ivory Bill!

:o)