Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 20 May 2009 (Wednesday) 12:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Just credit? Not for me

 
gregpphoto
Goldmember
1,123 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2008
Location: NJ
     
May 20, 2009 12:29 |  #1

Travelandleisure.com contacted me via flickr asking to use a photo for an article. The message says nothing about payment, just the ever-present line "we will give you photo credit". So I write back kindly asking what T&L's standard rate is for a single image, web-use only. No response. I follow up, politely, and again, no response. Now it's no sweat off my back, but I know they moved on to the next person that they thought they could get a free photo from and probably did. I lost out on credit (which has inexplicably become a form of payment in itself), but I maintained my integrity.

How, WHY does a company like Travel and Leisure hunt for free photos when they could and SHOULD easily pay for the photos?


gregpphoto.com (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaggymatt
Senior Member
555 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: South Central, PA
     
May 20, 2009 12:50 |  #2

I've been contacted a number of times through Flickr. Everyone expects something for free because it is on the internet. They will move onto the next person who will think cool, free credit for a picture I took. When I responded about pricing for my images, I never hear back.

For this reason, I make only the low resolution images available to non-friends. An image that could possibly generate a sale (something not of my kids) I'll watermark.


Pelican 1614
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Newfoundland_RCMP
Member
42 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Bonavista, NL
     
May 20, 2009 20:15 |  #3

Its not just companies. I had the Canadian Coast Guard contact me wanting to use a photo in a pamphlet they were producing. When I told them they would have to pay for the picture I never heard from them again. The way governments spend money I'm sure the budget for their pamphlet included money for photography.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dreamcatcher23
Member
225 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
May 20, 2009 20:28 |  #4

I know it's the way lots of things are going... but if there are so many people out there offering things for "credit" or for free, why should they bother paying someone if they're happy with the freebies?

jus' saying, not trolling or anything... but if they can get something for free (and often do), of course they'll skip the ones that ask about payment. It's a simple business choice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gregpphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,123 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2008
Location: NJ
     
May 20, 2009 20:32 |  #5

shaggymatt wrote in post #7957362 (external link)
For this reason, I make only the low resolution images available to non-friends. An image that could possibly generate a sale (something not of my kids) I'll watermark.

Ditto. I only post low res to the internet.


gregpphoto.com (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gregpphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,123 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2008
Location: NJ
     
May 20, 2009 20:41 |  #6

Does anyone feel as I do, though? That it's not just "oh well" but it's a very serious problem? I'm sure Travel and Leisure pays for people to write the articles, design the website, etc. WHY NOT PHOTOGRAPHY? How is it that photography is the one medium that has become so devalued that "credit" is tantamount to "payment"? And if that. I've had people talk to me as if giving me credit was somehow them doing me a favor. Excuse me, but as long as I own the copyright, you must BY LAW give me credit. It's not just some favor you're doing for me.


gregpphoto.com (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
u_loco_local
Member
121 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
May 20, 2009 20:58 |  #7

gregpphoto wrote in post #7959968 (external link)
Does anyone feel as I do, though? That it's not just "oh well" but it's a very serious problem? I'm sure Travel and Leisure pays for people to write the articles, design the website, etc. WHY NOT PHOTOGRAPHY? How is it that photography is the one medium that has become so devalued that "credit" is tantamount to "payment"? And if that. I've had people talk to me as if giving me credit was somehow them doing me a favor. Excuse me, but as long as I own the copyright, you must BY LAW give me credit. It's not just some favor you're doing for me.

agree


http://photocamel.com/​forum/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogloff
Cream of the Crop
7,606 posts
Likes: 416
Joined Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
     
May 20, 2009 22:00 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

gregpphoto wrote in post #7959968 (external link)
Does anyone feel as I do, though? That it's not just "oh well" but it's a very serious problem? I'm sure Travel and Leisure pays for people to write the articles, design the website, etc. WHY NOT PHOTOGRAPHY? How is it that photography is the one medium that has become so devalued that "credit" is tantamount to "payment"? And if that. I've had people talk to me as if giving me credit was somehow them doing me a favor. Excuse me, but as long as I own the copyright, you must BY LAW give me credit. It's not just some favor you're doing for me.

There are thousands times more photographers available than writers or web designers. How many web designers do you know that do it as a hobby? How many writers do you know that will knock off an article one weekend just for kicks. I know many photographers that take photos for the fun of it ( including myself ) and many of those photographers have not issues at all giving away their photos and if they actually get their name in a magazine, that is just a bonus. Unfortunately, that is the way photography is heading. Seems everyone on these forums are preoccupied with this fact, **** about it instead of figuring out a business model that might work in this new environment.

Like so many previous businesses, technology comes along and drastically changes the business. This is happening to the photo business right now. You need to change with the business or you will be out of business. Why do you think magazines like Travel and Leisure are looking for free photos. They are all fighting for their lives as the technology called the internet has drastically affected their business and has had a very negative impact on subscriptions and advertising revenues.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Metalstrm
Goldmember
Avatar
1,056 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Malta
     
May 21, 2009 06:39 |  #9

I agree with some of what you are saying, but well, most people don't cook for money, but chefs are paid. Imagine an environment where everybody starts hiring chefs simply for credit, a little tag attached to your plate which says "Cooked by ...". I bet chefs would be out of business soon.

Having said that, I think pros do have to rethink their business strategy in this environment.


Kristian D'Amato

http://www.krisdamato.​com (external link) - just my flickr at the moment.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaggymatt
Senior Member
555 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: South Central, PA
     
May 21, 2009 07:13 |  #10

gregpphoto wrote in post #7959968 (external link)
Excuse me, but as long as I own the copyright, you must BY LAW give me credit. It's not just some favor you're doing for me.

Do you *own* the copyright?? There is actually a legal procedure for filing your works with the Library of Congress I believe it is for a valid US Copyright registration. I looked into it a while ago, and I believe you have up to a year to register files, and there is a $35 fee.

http://www.copyright.g​ov/forms/ (external link)

There are a lot of provisions when licensing your work for sale. It is more of a courtesy to give credit for your work. They can buy full rights to your work and not give credit. It is all to be spelled out in the contract.

Thankfully, I have a friend who does contract law for a living, so I run everything past her!!!

I do agree with everything you said though. Photography on a hole has been devalued as camera prices fall and presenting your work on the internet becomes easier. Uncle Bob would be thrilled and brag to his buddies that he had his work published (for free) in Travel and Leisure.


Pelican 1614
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,367 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1372
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
May 21, 2009 07:24 as a reply to  @ Metalstrm's post |  #11

I agree with some of what you are saying, but well, most people don't cook for money, but chefs are paid. Imagine an environment where everybody starts hiring chefs simply for credit, a little tag attached to your plate which says "Cooked by ...". I bet chefs would be out of business soon.

What this means is that people won't pay for what they can do themselves or get free. That's why ma-and-pa diners close and specialty restaurants remain open. That's why carpenters have become "home remodelers"--they have to do more than a homeowner can do for himself.

Photographers who are able to offer a product that the average camera owner knows he can't duplicate will remain in business.

Travel photographers who can write the story that accompanies their lovely pictures will continue to do well.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digirebelva
Goldmember
Avatar
3,999 posts
Gallery: 376 photos
Likes: 1687
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Virginia
     
May 21, 2009 09:25 |  #12

shaggymatt wrote in post #7962219 (external link)
Do you *own* the copyright?? There is actually a legal procedure for filing your works with the Library of Congress I believe it is for a valid US Copyright registration. I looked into it a while ago, and I believe you have up to a year to register files, and there is a $35 fee.

http://www.copyright.g​ov/forms/ (external link)

From the US Copyright Website
Who Can Claim Copyright?
"Copyright protection subsists from the time the work is created in fixed form.."
"
"No publication or registration or other action in the Copyright Office is required to secure copyright"

The benefits of registering with the US Copyright Office
"
If registration is made within three months after publication of the work or prior to an infringement of the work, statutory damages and attorney’s fees will be available to the copyright owner in court actions. Otherwise, only an award of actual damages and profits is available to the copyright owner.



[SIZE=2]I belive that covers the "Do you own the copyright" question and why you should register your photos..:D


EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.

When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away
Website (external link) | Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sspellman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,731 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Detroit, Michigan
     
May 21, 2009 09:30 |  #13

Greg-

The reason that even T&L solicits for unpaid photos is simple-it works sometimes. Its the same reason there is spam-the revenue generated far exceeds the cost.

Websites like Flickr offer even commercial clients the opportunity to scan millions of pictures and solicit free use very easily, and essentially are part of the problem. When you offer hundreds of photos for free viewing by the public, you do not create the impression that they have high commercial value.

-Scott


ScottSpellmanMedia.com [photography]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gregpphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,123 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2008
Location: NJ
     
May 21, 2009 09:56 |  #14

sspellman wrote in post #7962819 (external link)
Greg-

The reason that even T&L solicits for unpaid photos is simple-it works sometimes. Its the same reason there is spam-the revenue generated far exceeds the cost.

Websites like Flickr offer even commercial clients the opportunity to scan millions of pictures and solicit free use very easily, and essentially are part of the problem. When you offer hundreds of photos for free viewing by the public, you do not create the impression that they have high commercial value.

-Scott

Unfortunately, you're right, it does work. But how does me showing my photography on the internet have any effect on the value of my work? Is there a difference between flickr and a website? I see all the time in peoples profiles "my works are for sale ask for permission yada yada."

digirebelva wrote in post #7962799 (external link)
"No publication or registration or other action in the Copyright Office is required to secure copyright"

Thank you.


gregpphoto.com (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ D
Member
150 posts
Joined May 2009
     
May 21, 2009 12:43 |  #15

Focusing on a reality check with a DOF that will make you Shudder

Times are changing very rapidly in the photography business and professional photographers must quickly learn to adapt and find their niche if they are to survive. Fifteen years ago if someone had told me that major camera manufactures would announce there were going to stop selling 33mm cameras in the US market place or that companies such as Kodak and other major film and camera companies would all but do away with 33mm film development services and products, I would have laughed at you - but they did. Then to see companies such as Ritz Camera and other similar companies practically fold and go out of business over night because the sudden switch to digital was simply too fast and too much for these companies to manage.

When I first began taking pictures “real” film was all that was available in the marketplace and I would go purchase several rolls of 35mm - 400 film with 36 exposures and carefully plan my pictures. I would then take the rolls of film to a local high quality film processing company. When one hour possessing took off it was great, especially when some local drug store chains jumped on the band wagon and invested in much better processing equipment and offered commercial accounts for photographers.

Overnight digital cameras came out and PP programs like Photo Shop took off and along with the affordable prices of small photo smart printers these items quickly combined to become the nails in the coffin for 33mm film processing and its equipment and this happened almost faster than you could get a roll of 35 mm film developed with double prints.

Digital equipment evolved just as quickly as I my last camera was considered “revolutionary” in the field of digital photography and garnered all the best reviews and accolades when it was unveiled, however today (five years later) that same camera is considered a dinosaur and the company Konica Minolta who manufactured it is out of camera business.

As mentioned the print media has suffered huge changes as well, look at how many long standing traditional newspapers and magazines have gone belly up. The print medias still around are struggling to even pay their bills, much less their writers.

Professional photographers have to understand the huge changes in the field of photography combined with the abundance of available photos and the rapid increase of the number of people who have taken their photography skills to the next level.

Ten years ago there wasn’t 8 gig memory chips that could store 4,000 pictures, the was no 20X optical zoom lenses, or even 20 mega pixel cameras, not to mention there wasn’t Flicker, Photo bucket, or the social networking sites that exist today on the internet. Today millions of images are uploaded daily onto the internet, which only cause hobbyists to become more qualified with equipment and technology not to mention great forums like this one where photographers get together and “network” sharing all their skills, tips and equipment experiences while newbie’s and hobbyists lurk in the shadows picking up tips and learning how to shoot pictures just like the professionals.

In the end it’s only going to get harder to sell your “professional” photographs for any real profit, as the competition is growing faster than Kudzu on a Carolina highway. The only way you will be able to make it in this business is with the best customer service, greater attention to even the smallest details, “more” and better professional equipment, and in at the end of the day it will probably be just like capturing a perfect picture - being in the right place at the right time with the proper lighting.


Canon Powershot SX10 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,344 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Just credit? Not for me
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1162 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.