I enjoyed the series and the post processing! I agree something is off with her facial expression from my point of view but it's her wedding day, she can do whatever she wants
e02937 Goldmember 2,714 posts Joined Dec 2008 More info | Nov 03, 2009 22:35 | #16 I enjoyed the series and the post processing! I agree something is off with her facial expression from my point of view but it's her wedding day, she can do whatever she wants Canon 7d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joruiz Goldmember ![]() 1,619 posts Likes: 313 Joined Oct 2006 More info | Nov 04, 2009 19:34 | #17 merlin2375 wrote in post #8950896 ![]() I enjoyed the series and the post processing! I agree something is off with her facial expression from my point of view but it's her wedding day, she can do whatever she wants ![]() Is not her wedding day if I understood correctly... Cantisani
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dcsmith40D Senior Member ![]() 543 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Atlanta More info | Nov 04, 2009 20:53 | #18 I posted some pictures that were dear to my heart from my daughter's wedding. I had fantasies that some people would like them and write me how good they were; I thought that people would offer tips and constructive criticism. I was let down when 200+ people looked and only one person commented. Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Michael Bottoms Cream of the Crop 6,297 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Whitby Ontario... just outside of Toronto More info | Nov 06, 2009 16:31 | #19 Well, I don't think she looks terrified in any of these shots. She has large beautiful eyes, and perhaps the wide-open look is interpreted as fear. It could just as easily be interpreted as surprise or even shock. I agree that a narrower dof would help these, but I get the impression the OP hasn't done the TTD thing before--or not often. Live and learn. When you read through these comments, it is readily apparent that some don't read the comments already there before speaking their mind. Might be a good idea to do that in the future. Thanks for sharing the trashing of your $3 dress. Thanks for convincing your lovely daughter to model for you. It looks like you had fun and that it was a family activity that hurt no one and nothing. Former Pentax & 20D owner... now the pleased owner of the new 50D, 580EX, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, Canon EF-S 60mm Macro, Canon EFS 17-85mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Kenko 1.4X Teleplus Pro 300, Sekonic L-508 Zoom Master Meter, Manfrotto and slik tripods, trekpod and other assorted accessories...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
johny39 Senior Member 567 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Windsor,Ontario/Canada More info | Nov 07, 2009 11:20 | #20 I don't know much about photography, but i really like her expression in shots. She is natural ,rare beautiful girl, large eyes,beautiful hair without typical false "cheese" smile. I always find cool natural faces more beautiful/honest/attractive in real life or pictures .False smilig faces and sunny days are boring, without expression. Canon 6D /Rebel T1i |24-105mm/ 18-55mm /55-250mm/Toki 11-16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
anorphirith Senior Member 356 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: San Francisco, CA More info | Nov 08, 2009 01:32 | #21 I need a defibrillator 1DsII 50mm f/1.4, 28-75mm f/2.8, 135mm f/2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sctbiggs Goldmember 1,793 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: North Carolina More info | Nov 11, 2009 10:40 | #22 joedlh wrote in post #8917672 ![]() Fuddy-duddy alert here. I see no merit, photographically or otherwise, in encouraging someone to destroy a dress for which they paid hundreds or thousands of dollars. Please don't tell me that it's an attempt to express contempt for the money-grabbing wedding industry. If so, then one could take equally entertaining pictures of taking a sledge hammer to the limo or the photographer's equipment, or feeding the wedding bouquet to a goat. If this is the kind of photography that is now the cutting edge of wedding work, count me out. I put it in the same category as those rock stars who destroy their instruments at the end of the concert. You know there's some poor kid somewhere who would sell his soul for one of those guitars. Likewise for a one-time-use wedding gown. Give it to the Salvation Army for somebody who can't afford a designer dress. I'd like to see someone do a photographic essay on that. dress was picked up at a thrift shop for $3! your rant and rave is falling on deaf ears. Baby Girl 2.0 has arrived!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dcsmith40D Senior Member ![]() 543 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Atlanta More info | Nov 11, 2009 16:44 | #23 sctbiggs wrote in post #8996224 ![]() dress was picked up at a thrift shop for $3! your rant and rave is falling on deaf ears. Wow! I wish my daughter would have found a dress like that for her wedding. I wouldn't care if she would have burned it for that price. Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mossman6 Senior Member ![]() 952 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Sacramento, California More info | Nov 13, 2009 14:40 | #24 The swinging shot is by far the most pleasing shot to me as it looks the most natural. It sounded like you had fun, which is important to have. My name is Josh. I love FB likes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dcmoon Member ![]() 30 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Western NY More info | Nov 14, 2009 10:11 | #25 Love #3, sitting in the pond with your wedding dress reading a brides mag....priceless DCMOON
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jhcanon Member 197 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Dark side of the moon More info | Nov 14, 2009 13:03 | #26 I think the dress looks a bit old-fashioned but have no issue with your daughter's facial expressions. She is beautiful no matter what expression on her face! The 50-50-90 rule: Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Metolius81 Member 32 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Nov 14, 2009 21:40 | #27 Since the whole idea of trashing the dress (which doesn't have to be taken literal) is a modern approach to a post-wedding bridal shoot, I think getting a dress that looks like it's from 1982 isn't going to help you much for your portfolio. I would suggest looking into a workshop with models and contemporary dresses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bradfordguy Senior Member 941 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Bradford, Ontario More info | I think the background is probably the biggest negative for me. Not enough "snap" or life just there. Pretty girl though, just find a nicer place to shoot. G10, 7D gripped, 17-55 2.8 IS , 70-200L 2.8 IS MKII, EF 85 1.8, 105 2.8 EX Sigma Macro, 1.4 TC , 580 EXII, 430 EX, ST-E2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is alancrotty 579 guests, 193 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |