Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 21 May 2009 (Thursday) 23:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Trash the Dress

 
e02937
Goldmember
2,714 posts
Joined Dec 2008
     
Nov 03, 2009 22:35 |  #16

I enjoyed the series and the post processing! I agree something is off with her facial expression from my point of view but it's her wedding day, she can do whatever she wants :)


Canon 7d
[15-85 IS] [70-200
f/4L IS] [I'm a PC]
[Full gear list and feedback]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joruiz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,619 posts
Likes: 313
Joined Oct 2006
     
Nov 04, 2009 19:34 |  #17

merlin2375 wrote in post #8950896 (external link)
I enjoyed the series and the post processing! I agree something is off with her facial expression from my point of view but it's her wedding day, she can do whatever she wants :)

Is not her wedding day if I understood correctly... ;)


Cantisani
my facebook profile (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dcsmith40D
Senior Member
Avatar
543 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta
     
Nov 04, 2009 20:53 |  #18

I posted some pictures that were dear to my heart from my daughter's wedding. I had fantasies that some people would like them and write me how good they were; I thought that people would offer tips and constructive criticism. I was let down when 200+ people looked and only one person commented.

But after reading these comments, I guess I got off easy.


Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II

David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michael ­ Bottoms
Cream of the Crop
6,297 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Whitby Ontario... just outside of Toronto
     
Nov 06, 2009 16:31 |  #19

Well, I don't think she looks terrified in any of these shots. She has large beautiful eyes, and perhaps the wide-open look is interpreted as fear. It could just as easily be interpreted as surprise or even shock. I agree that a narrower dof would help these, but I get the impression the OP hasn't done the TTD thing before--or not often. Live and learn. When you read through these comments, it is readily apparent that some don't read the comments already there before speaking their mind. Might be a good idea to do that in the future. Thanks for sharing the trashing of your $3 dress. Thanks for convincing your lovely daughter to model for you. It looks like you had fun and that it was a family activity that hurt no one and nothing.


Former Pentax & 20D owner... now the pleased owner of the new 50D, 580EX, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, Canon EF-S 60mm Macro, Canon EFS 17-85mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Kenko 1.4X Teleplus Pro 300, Sekonic L-508 Zoom Master Meter, Manfrotto and slik tripods, trekpod and other assorted accessories...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johny39
Senior Member
567 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Windsor,Ontario/Canada
     
Nov 07, 2009 11:20 |  #20

I don't know much about photography, but i really like her expression in shots. She is natural ,rare beautiful girl, large eyes,beautiful hair without typical false "cheese" smile. I always find cool natural faces more beautiful/honest/attra​ctive in real life or pictures .False smilig faces and sunny days are boring, without expression.


Canon 6D /Rebel T1i |24-105mm/ 18-55mm /55-250mm/Toki 11-16

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anorphirith
Senior Member
356 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Nov 08, 2009 01:32 |  #21

I need a defibrillator


1DsII 50mm f/1.4, 28-75mm f/2.8, 135mm f/2L
-Kiev 88, 120mm f/2.8 ! 80mm f/2.8
-Leica R3
-Canon AE-1 & Kodak retina I a

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sctbiggs
Goldmember
1,793 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: North Carolina
     
Nov 11, 2009 10:40 |  #22

joedlh wrote in post #8917672 (external link)
Fuddy-duddy alert here.

I see no merit, photographically or otherwise, in encouraging someone to destroy a dress for which they paid hundreds or thousands of dollars. Please don't tell me that it's an attempt to express contempt for the money-grabbing wedding industry. If so, then one could take equally entertaining pictures of taking a sledge hammer to the limo or the photographer's equipment, or feeding the wedding bouquet to a goat. If this is the kind of photography that is now the cutting edge of wedding work, count me out.

I put it in the same category as those rock stars who destroy their instruments at the end of the concert. You know there's some poor kid somewhere who would sell his soul for one of those guitars. Likewise for a one-time-use wedding gown. Give it to the Salvation Army for somebody who can't afford a designer dress. I'd like to see someone do a photographic essay on that.

dress was picked up at a thrift shop for $3! your rant and rave is falling on deaf ears.


Baby Girl 2.0 has arrived!
Facebook (external link) | Wilmington, NC Wedding and Portrait Photographers (external link) - The seriously outdated website.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dcsmith40D
Senior Member
Avatar
543 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta
     
Nov 11, 2009 16:44 |  #23

sctbiggs wrote in post #8996224 (external link)
dress was picked up at a thrift shop for $3! your rant and rave is falling on deaf ears.

Wow! I wish my daughter would have found a dress like that for her wedding. I wouldn't care if she would have burned it for that price.


Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II

David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mossman6
Senior Member
Avatar
952 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Sacramento, California
     
Nov 13, 2009 14:40 |  #24

The swinging shot is by far the most pleasing shot to me as it looks the most natural. It sounded like you had fun, which is important to have.


My name is Josh. I love FB likes.
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dcmoon
Member
Avatar
30 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Western NY
     
Nov 14, 2009 10:11 |  #25

Love #3, sitting in the pond with your wedding dress reading a brides mag....priceless


DCMOON
5DII
70-200 2.8L , 24-70 2.8L , Tamron 200-500
580 EX, Some AB's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhcanon
Member
197 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Dark side of the moon
     
Nov 14, 2009 13:03 |  #26

I think the dress looks a bit old-fashioned but have no issue with your daughter's facial expressions. She is beautiful no matter what expression on her face!

I too like the shot of her reading Bride magazine - makes sure the context is maintained.


The 50-50-90 rule: Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Metolius81
Member
32 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 14, 2009 21:40 |  #27

Since the whole idea of trashing the dress (which doesn't have to be taken literal) is a modern approach to a post-wedding bridal shoot, I think getting a dress that looks like it's from 1982 isn't going to help you much for your portfolio. I would suggest looking into a workshop with models and contemporary dresses.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bradfordguy
Senior Member
941 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Bradford, Ontario
     
Nov 14, 2009 21:53 as a reply to  @ post 8950872 |  #28

I think the background is probably the biggest negative for me. Not enough "snap" or life just there. Pretty girl though, just find a nicer place to shoot.


G10, 7D gripped, 17-55 2.8 IS , 70-200L 2.8 IS MKII, EF 85 1.8, 105 2.8 EX Sigma Macro, 1.4 TC , 580 EXII, 430 EX, ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,542 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
Trash the Dress
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is alancrotty
579 guests, 193 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.