Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 24 Apr 2005 (Sunday) 21:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

50mm f/1.8 ugly brokeh

 
booggerg
Senior Member
Avatar
460 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Apr 24, 2005 21:07 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

What the heck?? Does anyone have any example of a 50mm 1.4 lens wide open? I heard that has better brokeh

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

20D || EOS650 || 50 f/1.8 MKI || 17-40 f/4L || 70-200 f/4L || Sigma 35-135 f/3.5 || Yashica Electro 35 || Yashica Minister || Yashica Mat 124G || Hoga 120CFN || 420EX || Sekonic 306 || Panasonic DVX100 || Canon GL2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
cactusclay
Goldmember
1,610 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Apr 24, 2005 21:30 |  #2

50/1.4@1.4. Sort of short notice and it's dark outside, but this is 3ft from subject and subject is about five feet from the TV. :D


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
50,923 posts
Likes: 334
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 24, 2005 21:36 |  #3

You're right, that is pretty ugly. Try searching by lens type on pbase.com


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dante ­ King
"Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister
Avatar
9,134 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Anselmo, California
     
Apr 24, 2005 22:08 |  #4

Must be due to the light coming thru the tree. I had great results with my 1.8


Dante
I am not an Lcoholic. Lcoholics go to meetings!
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
booggerg
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
460 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Apr 24, 2005 23:10 as a reply to  @ Dante King's post |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

Or does the bokeh progressively get worse of objects further from the lens? those trees were perhaps 10-12 feet away from the camera lens.


20D || EOS650 || 50 f/1.8 MKI || 17-40 f/4L || 70-200 f/4L || Sigma 35-135 f/3.5 || Yashica Electro 35 || Yashica Minister || Yashica Mat 124G || Hoga 120CFN || 420EX || Sekonic 306 || Panasonic DVX100 || Canon GL2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,409 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 4510
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Apr 24, 2005 23:14 |  #6

We don't know what aperture you were shooting.. with the sun in the image I would asume you were stopped down a bit.. which would totally change the bokeh..

Also,. you may not have enough distance to the trees relative to your distance from the focus subject. ie: that your too far from the railing (the focus subject) ... try doing it where you are closer to the railing... and/or make sure you are shooting at f/1.8


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,409 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 4510
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Apr 24, 2005 23:15 as a reply to  @ booggerg's post |  #7

booggerg wrote:
Or does the bokeh progressively get worse of objects further from the lens? those trees were perhaps 10-12 feet away from the camera lens.


The further you are from subject focus,. the larger the depth of feild.. so yes in a sense,. this could have something to do with it.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cmM
Goldmember
Avatar
5,705 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Chicago / San Francisco
     
Apr 24, 2005 23:34 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

it's not as smooth indeed, due to the 5 blade diaphragm... you can do *a lot* better than that though (as far as bokeh).... that looks pretty ugly




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Olegis
Goldmember
Avatar
2,073 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Israel
     
Apr 24, 2005 23:55 as a reply to  @ post 514540 |  #9

The 50mm f/1.8 sometimes does produce some pretty ugly bokeh - here's a picture shot at 1.8 :

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/olegis/image/30873404.jpg

Best wishes,
Oleg.

www.Olegis.com (external link)
My equipment list
'I take orders from no one except the photographers' – Harry S Truman

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Apr 25, 2005 03:23 |  #10

You are right, the 50/1.4 is generally known to produce better bokeh.

Still, I think the main problem with your pictures is the harsh lighting conditions (light coming through tree). I've seen pictures from other lenses like this where I did not like the (otherwise nice) bokeh.

Y'know, when you think you know it all, there's another thing left to consider :lol:

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roanjohn
Goldmember
Avatar
3,791 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
     
Apr 25, 2005 06:36 |  #11

Blame it on the blades...........less blades = less rounded bokeh leading to the choppiness you see on your image.............I don't know how much better the f1.4 version would do though......but probably a tad better.

Ro1




www.pbase.com/roanjohn (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bauerman
discount on value meals
3,457 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Idaho!
     
Apr 25, 2005 06:43 |  #12

Was this shot with the 1.8 or the 1.4 - title of the post and body of the post are not in agreement there.....??




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Apr 25, 2005 06:53 |  #13

Take a look here (external link) for examples of the bokeh of the 2 lenses.

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
booggerg
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
460 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Apr 25, 2005 07:18 as a reply to  @ Andy_T's post |  #14
bannedPermanent ban

My original image was shot at 1.8. .I wouldn't put up a picture of any other aperature..


20D || EOS650 || 50 f/1.8 MKI || 17-40 f/4L || 70-200 f/4L || Sigma 35-135 f/3.5 || Yashica Electro 35 || Yashica Minister || Yashica Mat 124G || Hoga 120CFN || 420EX || Sekonic 306 || Panasonic DVX100 || Canon GL2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mr.photoguy
Goldmember
1,012 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: new york
     
Apr 25, 2005 10:21 |  #15

heh.. this is at f3.2, or 3.5 I forgot the Av already.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

http://www.pbase.com …t/image/4182997​1/original (external link)

This is why I have the Tamron 28-75, and contemplating a 85 1.8 (used or new)

Bruce
~~Your learn a lot more when your camera is out of hybernation....~~
my pbase page (external link)
C20D
10mm 2.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

60,908 views & 0 likes for this thread
50mm f/1.8 ugly brokeh
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is PhotosByLena
500 guests, 409 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.