Original Photo b4 HDR
1. Shot of a HDR Flaming tree
2. Another shot of HDR Flaming tree.
3. My attempt of editing the photo from previous help
4. Another Edit Attempt
Hope you guys enjoy the pictures.
jdmstylej6 Member 69 posts Joined May 2009 More info | May 25, 2009 18:45 | #1 Original Photo b4 HDR 1. Shot of a HDR Flaming tree 2. Another shot of HDR Flaming tree. 3. My attempt of editing the photo from previous help 4. Another Edit Attempt Hope you guys enjoy the pictures. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drchrisdvm2009 Member 171 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Sarasota, Florida More info | May 26, 2009 02:31 | #2 I like the idea, I've never seen one of these in person before. Seems like an interesting tree. To me, it could be sharper so the individual flowers were more distinct. Also, the telephone pole in the back is a little distracting as is the bench in the bottom left. Canon 5DIII, 50D, XSi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HappySnapper90 Cream of the Crop 5,145 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | May 26, 2009 08:56 | #3 There is really too much saturation in #2, the orange colors seem to be glowing and the green is just too much. It needs more contrast, there aren't enough shadow contrasts in #2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyMathers I am Spartacus! 43,819 posts Likes: 2901 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | May 26, 2009 09:15 | #4 No 1 is the better one for me. In No 2, the reds in particular have lost their definition.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mitch_A Junior Member 28 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Winnipeg, MB More info | May 26, 2009 09:26 | #5 In my opinion, they both need a little more work. In #1 you're clouds are grey, when they look like they should be white, and #2 it's way over-saturated. Though all in all these shots don't need HDR treatment, this scene could easily be captured in a single frame [Canon] 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Evilfooker Senior Member 257 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Acworth, GA More info | May 26, 2009 09:51 | #6 I think you would have better luck with just adjust the Highlights and Shadows than doing an HDR on these since the detail has been drowned out by the over saturation of the images. But I think w/ a bit more tweaking it could turn out to be a great photo James C. | Canon EOS 50D | | EF 28-90mm f/4-5.6 III AF Lens | EF 50mm f/1.8 | Vivitar 730AFC | Canon AE-1 | 50mm f/1.8 | 28mm f/2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks for the tips and comments of the photo.. I will keep in mind all what given ideas and learning for me is a must.. Thanks again for the help.. Hope you like the pics and stay tune for more pictures.. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 27, 2009 20:04 | #8 posted up another picture for you all to see.. i edited.. but i think its much better now.. or need experts comments Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mitch_A Junior Member 28 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Winnipeg, MB More info | May 27, 2009 20:47 | #9 The red's are still over saturated IMO. Maybe post the original to show us what you're working with [Canon] 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 27, 2009 22:45 | #10 There try lookin at the 4th photo.. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Originals has been posted! Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Randy1213 Goldmember 1,087 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2007 Location: San Francisco More info | No offense, Mark, but I'd suggest you shoot the tree again (trying to avoid the transformer and power line background), then work it old-school. I think this is a very cool tree and would frankly like to see it with good comp and single-image processing rather than jacked up in Photomatix. But, again, that's just my two cents and I mean no offense. No-Excuses Kit: 1Ds Mk III, 1D Mk IV, 60D (IR Only). Lenses (all Canon): 16-35m f/2.8 L, 24-70mm f/2.8 L, 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS, 85 mm f/1.2 L MkII, 100mm f/2.8 macro, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 macro, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye. Support : Gitzo 3541L + RRS BH-55 LR Ballhead.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewHicksPhotography Goldmember 2,552 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada More info | May 28, 2009 19:40 | #13 This is why you should have a license to practice HDR. Calgary Wedding Photography by Matthew Hicks: www.matthicksphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 28, 2009 22:41 | #14 Trainboy wrote in post #8007492 This is why you should have a license to practice HDR. Do I need to? LOL.. Just because your a pro, and you do not want a beginner to become good.. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1038 guests, 184 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||