Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 31 May 2009 (Sunday) 11:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Some flowers..

 
Cole_Schmitt
Goldmember
Avatar
1,280 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Rochester, NY
     
May 31, 2009 11:41 |  #1

Hey guys, well I took these just recently and I want to know how they came out? If you can, help me out and tell me what to do differently next time! Thanks alot..

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Cole_S

Cole | flickr (external link)
XTi • 17-55 ƒ2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brennasg
"Late to the party!"
Avatar
1,246 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
May 31, 2009 11:58 |  #2

I am certainly not the flower expert..but the number one issue for me in all of these is the actual flowers. They don't seem to be in the best condition to get a good photo out of.

I also guess they would be better with stronger DOF.. did you do any PP on these? You could do a lot to improve them with that alone. However I would find some different flowers.

Like I said I am NOT the flower expert, just telling you what I personally think. :)


Franklin Tn Baby Photographer (external link) | Blog! (external link) |Follow Sparkling Seal on Twitter (external link)|Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonydee
Goldmember
Avatar
2,009 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Tokyo
     
May 31, 2009 12:11 |  #3

#1 has some charm: a gritty appeal, a more varied orange->red hue to the petals, better background and DOF. You're angled across the flowers more which invites the eye to move past them and around the shot. All good. On the cons side, there are "half flowers" along left, bottom and right edges though, which can lead the eye out of the frame.

#2 and #3 are too central, and the background is unappealing. Try the "Rule of Thirds" and put important points on core subject matter a third in from an left or right and/or top or bottom.

Cheers, Tony


5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
http://www.picasaweb.c​om/anthonypon (external link) recent work

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bonito
Member
99 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Massachusetts
     
Jun 01, 2009 14:17 |  #4

Someone once told me that if you are photographing flowers make sure there is
no dead flowers/leave in the photo - unless of course, that is what you are looking
to portray. I do like the first shot, that is my favorite, the other 2 I do not care for.
Just my 2 cents.


Jenn
Canon
XTi Gripped, Canon 100-400 L, Canon 100mm Macro, Sigma 17-70 Macro,Canon 18-55 & Canon 75-300
Canon 580EX II flash, Manfrotto 055XPRO tripod with a Giottos MH-1301 head

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
travis.m.roberts
Member
35 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
     
Jun 01, 2009 15:15 as a reply to  @ Bonito's post |  #5

Great shots but if I may offer a critique. They all seem a but underexposed to me. I like my flower shots bright and these just don't seem to be bright enough.


Canon 50D, EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM, EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, Tamron 200-400 f/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
40Dman
Senior Member
680 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Mississippi
     
Jun 01, 2009 15:17 |  #6

I agree with the others. The first shot is pretty and cheerful. I love the colors. The second one is just not looking up to par... I mean the flower itself.. and as others have stated, it doesn't do it justice to center it. The third one is like the second. The water drops are just too much and the poor flower looks drowned.

40D's wife


Steve
Comments or constructive criticism always welcome!
40D, EF-S 55-250 IS, 28-135 Kit Lens, 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ADAPTE
Member
Avatar
244 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Panamá
     
Jun 01, 2009 18:03 |  #7

IMHO a bit underexposed... i only like the framing in the first one, also i agree with brennasg and bonito these are not the best looking flowers.

Saludos,


Xti
 (external link)http://www.flickr.com/​photos/aaac/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
QueenChatty
Goldmember
Avatar
2,178 posts
Likes: 4
Joined May 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Jun 01, 2009 19:49 |  #8

I would have to agree number one is very nice. The other two look a little worse for wear. It's hard to get caught in the moment and forget about the good old rule of thirds. I will have to post my flower shots from today....I think I may have done the same thing LOL Don't feel bad all part of a learning curve.


5D MarkII | 50D Canon 17-40mm|55-250 | 60mm Macro | 50mm 1.4 | 24-105L IS | 580EXII | 70-200L F2.8 IS II | Ultra Zap 800 |StarFlash 300 X2 | AB 400X 2 Flickr  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ncrose
Member
35 posts
Joined Feb 2009
     
Jun 01, 2009 20:59 |  #9

My advise on the flowers is to try and shoot them from a different angle. To me all your shots seem to be pretty much shooting down at them. Do not be afraid to get down and shoot them on the same level, or have fun and try to shoot them from under them.


Canon Rebel XSi
Canon 50mm F/1.8
Canon IS 55mm-250mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cole_Schmitt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,280 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Rochester, NY
     
Jun 03, 2009 15:44 |  #10

Thanks alot guys! I will definitely take all your words for the next time I shoot flowers :)


Cole | flickr (external link)
XTi • 17-55 ƒ2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,022 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Some flowers..
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1359 guests, 188 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.