Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 03 Jun 2009 (Wednesday) 14:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Mark III --- ISO selection --- can't shoot L-100 or 3200-H, even with C.Fn allows

 
therealmr
Senior Member
519 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
     
Jun 03, 2009 14:54 |  #1

C.Fn I: Exposure (3) = high iso H, low iso L ENABLED, but I can't select them when adjusting ISO. I can only select the native (200-3200) ISO. Is there another C.Fn that might interfere with this?

It was working before, I'm unsure what I did here...


http://www.simkinsphot​ography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Jun 03, 2009 14:55 |  #2

Do you have highlight tone priority set?


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
therealmr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
519 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
     
Jun 03, 2009 14:57 |  #3

Yes... interesting - why is it that tone priority nixes your high ISOs?


http://www.simkinsphot​ography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Jun 03, 2009 14:58 |  #4

Also FWIW, the native ISO range on the 1D MKIII is 100 - 3200.


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,917 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10108
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 03, 2009 15:12 |  #5

therealmr wrote in post #8043437 (external link)
Yes... interesting - why is it that tone priority nixes your high ISOs?

Because it can;t shift to the next highest or lowest ISO setting if your already at the max or minimum possible setting...
There's no more there there to move to.....
For it to work, it needs to go to the next level..


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeES
Senior Member
Avatar
548 posts
Likes: 189
Joined Sep 2008
Location: ON, Canada
     
Jun 03, 2009 15:15 |  #6

timnosenzo wrote in post #8043456 (external link)
Also FWIW, the native ISO range on the 1D MKIII is 100 - 3200.

But highlight tone priority nixes iso 100...


Mike (external link)
1D X | White Kiss X7 | White 40 F2.8 Pancake | 50 F1.2L | 100 F2.8L IS Macro | 300 F4L IS | 11-24 F4L | 24-70 F2.8L II | 70-200 F2.8L II IS | Σ 150-600 OS Sport
580EXII | AB1600 | ABR800 | 1.4x II | Lee SW150 II | Kenko DG Tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Jun 03, 2009 15:17 |  #7

MikeES wrote in post #8043561 (external link)
But highlight tone priority nixes iso 100...

Right, because that is the lowest NATIVE ISO. L (ISO 50) is not a NATIVE ISO.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PIXmantra
Goldmember
1,193 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Florida, U.S.A.
     
Jun 03, 2009 15:31 |  #8

A slight correction, here...

timnosenzo wrote in post #8043456 (external link)
Also FWIW, the native ISO range on the 1D MKIII is 100 - 3200.

...This camera's native ISO range is the entire ISo100-3200 and ISo6400.

Per all my raw files archive, every ISO step (at least measured from ISO800), all the way to ISO6400 are pretty much and generated or derived from analog amplification. NO strange/crooked shadows-data in the bottom of the RAW files (no signs of "artificial" intelligence, that is).

Now, that the effective DR decreases by basically one (1) stop, going from ISo3200 to ISo6400, is another thing.

But rest assured that ISO6400 is not fabricated at a later digital stage, in the 1D3 (exactly same for 1DsMarkIII's ISO3200). Interestingly, the 5D MarkII that I got for inspection a few days ago, does fabricate ISo6400 and beyond, in the digital domain, indeed. (I did not measure/captured ISo4000 and ISo5000 frames, though).

Enjoy,

PIX


Click here for FlexNR-Professional Noise Reduction for EOS 1D3
CPS Member/ 2x1DMKIII/ 70D/ Pentax MX
300mm f/2.8 L II IS/ 24mm f/1.4 L II/ 35mm f/2.0 IS/ 17-40 f/4 L/ 24-105 f/4 L IS / 70-200 f/4 L IS
270EX/ 580EX/ 580EX II/ ST-E2/ CP-E3
HP Z800 x2 XEON, x12 Core/ EIZO CG241W/ Viewsonic VP930b

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Jun 03, 2009 15:33 |  #9

PIXmantra wrote in post #8043651 (external link)
...This camera's native ISO range is the entire ISo100-3200 and ISo6400.

Per all my raw files archive, every ISO step (at least measured from ISO800), all the way to ISO6400 are pretty much and generated or derived from analog amplification. NO strange/crooked shadows-data in the bottom of the RAW files (no signs of "artificial" intelligence, that is).

Now, that the effective DR decreases by basically one (1) stop, going from ISo3200 to ISo6400, is another thing.

But rest assured that ISO6400 is not fabricated at a later digital stage, in the 1D3 (exactly same for 1DsMarkIII's ISO3200).

Enjoy,

PIX

By native we are referring to non-extended ISOs, no one said anything about being computer generated in camera.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PIXmantra
Goldmember
1,193 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Florida, U.S.A.
     
Jun 03, 2009 15:45 |  #10

Ah, understood!

In2Photos wrote in post #8043667 (external link)
By native we are referring to non-extended ISOs, no one said anything about being computer generated in camera.

...It is just that "h", in my world, simply means that the Turbo is about to spool up all the way to 40psi... :lol:

Enjoy,

PIX


Click here for FlexNR-Professional Noise Reduction for EOS 1D3
CPS Member/ 2x1DMKIII/ 70D/ Pentax MX
300mm f/2.8 L II IS/ 24mm f/1.4 L II/ 35mm f/2.0 IS/ 17-40 f/4 L/ 24-105 f/4 L IS / 70-200 f/4 L IS
270EX/ 580EX/ 580EX II/ ST-E2/ CP-E3
HP Z800 x2 XEON, x12 Core/ EIZO CG241W/ Viewsonic VP930b

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Jun 03, 2009 15:45 |  #11

PIXmantra wrote in post #8043712 (external link)
...It is just that "h", in my world, simply means that the Turbo is about to spool up all the way to 40psi... :lol:

Enjoy,

PIX

40? :shock:


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Jun 03, 2009 15:46 |  #12

PIXmantra wrote in post #8043651 (external link)
...This camera's native ISO range is the entire ISo100-3200 and ISo6400.

Per all my raw files archive, every ISO step (at least measured from ISO800), all the way to ISO6400 are pretty much and generated or derived from analog amplification. NO strange/crooked shadows-data in the bottom of the RAW files (no signs of "artificial" intelligence, that is).

Now, that the effective DR decreases by basically one (1) stop, going from ISo3200 to ISo6400, is another thing.

But rest assured that ISO6400 is not fabricated at a later digital stage, in the 1D3 (exactly same for 1DsMarkIII's ISO3200). Interestingly, the 5D MarkII that I got for inspection a few days ago, does fabricate ISo6400 and beyond, in the digital domain, indeed. (I did not measure/captured ISo4000 and ISo5000 frames, though).

Enjoy,

PIX

Okey dokie.....


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,229 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Mark III --- ISO selection --- can't shoot L-100 or 3200-H, even with C.Fn allows
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1147 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.