Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 04 Jun 2009 (Thursday) 11:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which of those three light panels to get?

 
abdul10000
Senior Member
309 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: The Arabic World
     
Jun 04, 2009 11:43 |  #1

Which of those three 42" flexible reflector would you recommend:

1. Photoflex 5 in 1 with translucent, gold, silver, white opaque, soft gold and black $100
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …Reflector_5.htm​l#features (external link)

2. Westcott 6 in 1 with two frames and Full-Stop Diffusion, Two-Stop Diffusion, Silver, Gold, Sunlight and Black, but no white $100
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …ails&Q=&sku=279​427&is=REG (external link)

3. Impact 5 in 1 with Gold, Silver, Silver/Gold, White and Translucent $47
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …ails&Q=&sku=358​608&is=REG (external link)

I am leaning towards the Westcott because it offers two frames, hence two reflectors, but no white is offered. The Impact is priced at half and includes white. Should I get two Impacts, is their quality poor?

What do you recommened? Thanks in advance!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jun 04, 2009 12:30 |  #2

I use Photoflex LiteDisc reflectors in a lot of my work and as long as I'm in the studio I find them to be very nice, but the reality is that most collapsible reflectors are pretty much the same and I've heard good things about some of the lesser expensive brands as well.

I like Westcott a lot but if you're looking for a simple all in one solution I don't see that as a good solution because there is no white reflector. Sure, you could just use a piece of white foam core but with regard to your question and purchase, I would not get a ?-in-1 solution that didn't have a white reflector.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abdul10000
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
309 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: The Arabic World
     
Jun 04, 2009 12:51 |  #3

TMR Design wrote in post #8049088 (external link)
I use Photoflex LiteDisc reflectors in a lot of my work and as long as I'm in the studio I find them to be very nice, but the reality is that most collapsible reflectors are pretty much the same and I've heard good things about some of the lesser expensive brands as well.

I like Westcott a lot but if you're looking for a simple all in one solution I don't see that as a good solution because there is no white reflector. Sure, you could just use a piece of white foam core but with regard to your question and purchase, I would not get a ?-in-1 solution that didn't have a white reflector.

makes sense, I guess I should go with either photoflex or impact, but I am not sure about the quality of Impact.

Anyone has the 5 in 1 Impact reflector? Is the quality good, will it hold up to daily use? Your feedback is much appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jun 04, 2009 13:06 as a reply to  @ abdul10000's post |  #4

Daily use has to be better defined. I use my reflectors daily in the studio and haven't had any problems. Some of my reflectors are several years old. I've seen these collapsible reflectors flake and peel from being stored and transported in hot climates and under the hot sun. I've seen Photoflex reflectors that looked like sh*t from being used in extreme hot and cold.

In the studio, in a temperature and humidity controlled environment I think they would last a very long time but for location work they seem to have issues and I think that would be the case with any of these collapsible reflectors.

I'm sure that is what separates this type of reflector from the Lastolite and California Sunbounce materials, but you certainly pay a premium for those fabrics and the design and construction of the aluminum frames.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abdul10000
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
309 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: The Arabic World
     
Jun 14, 2009 23:53 |  #5

Just received my 42" Impact 5-1 panel, I have to say it came to be about what I expected. The disc quality is good. The reflective materiel looks cheap and may peel in time. The zipper is diffently going to be giving me problems in the long run. Overall I am satisfied with what I got.

That being said there are few things I wish I could have learned before buying this panel. The 42" disc folds down to 15", which is a bit too large to fit into my camera bag. 42" is awsome as a refelctive/translucent surface size, but I think 30" would have been a more practicel solution because it folds down to 10" only, which is possible to fit inside a bag.

The reflective material is a double sided cover that has on one lining gold and white and the other sunfire and silver. I absolutely hate this arrangement because I have no use for gold or sunfire. Instead of putting silver and white on one lining they switched them around. Normally I would like to try both white and silver to see which to go with. To do that with this disc I have unzip the whole cover and switch it inside out and zip it back. That is absolutely ridicules.

Also the whole ziping and unzipping ordeal isn't a very practical solution as might seem at first. I think buying double (2-1) refelcetive matrail is probabaly a smarter solution.

Live and learn as they say. In light of all of the above any one can suggest a panel that will address all the above issues?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jun 15, 2009 01:37 |  #6

abdul10000 wrote in post #8111204 (external link)
Just received my 42" Impact 5-1 panel, I have to say it came to be about what I expected. The disc quality is good. The reflective materiel looks cheap and may peel in time. The zipper is diffently going to be giving me problems in the long run. Overall I am satisfied with what I got.

That being said there are few things I wish I could have learned before buying this panel. The 42" disc folds down to 15", which is a bit too large to fit into my camera bag. 42" is awsome as a refelctive/translucent surface size, but I think 30" would have been a more practicel solution because it folds down to 10" only, which is possible to fit inside a bag.

The reflective material is a double sided cover that has on one lining gold and white and the other sunfire and silver. I absolutely hate this arrangement because I have no use for gold or sunfire. Instead of putting silver and white on one lining they switched them around. Normally I would like to try both white and silver to see which to go with. To do that with this disc I have unzip the whole cover and switch it inside out and zip it back. That is absolutely ridicules.

Also the whole ziping and unzipping ordeal isn't a very practical solution as might seem at first. I think buying double (2-1) refelcetive matrail is probabaly a smarter solution.

Live and learn as they say. In light of all of the above any one can suggest a panel that will address all the above issues?

Don't be so quick to put the sunfire aside. Sunfire is also called soft gold by some manufacturers and it a 50/50 mix of silver and gold. While you may think it has no use I can definitely tell you that I absolutely love using a soft gold reflector on women with dark skin and on location to add a very nice skin tone to women that are tan and dark skinned.

You get the specularity of silver with a slightly warm tone from the gold. Give it a try sometime and you may find you like it.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abdul10000
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
309 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: The Arabic World
     
Jul 02, 2009 01:06 |  #7

Time for an update.

I used the reflector for some time now. I find two problems that are inherent in the 5 in 1 design. The circular shape makes using them in tight studio shots very difficult. Since the reflector must be centered to obtain best reflection the edges enter the picture frame. Changing the disc angle might move it out of the frame but will also change the angle of reflection relative to the light source, which reduces the light being reflected back. I think this shape is perfect for diffusing sun light, but for studio work I think a more traditional square or rectangular shape is better.

The other thing, its hard to collapse and store the reflector when fitted with the reflective cover. Removing the cover makes folding down the disk much easier and keeps it from bouncing open so easily. That means the reflective materiel must be zipped off the disc and folded separately to be placed in its bag. More steps and hassle for a product that I bought thinking would be very practical.

Doing this over I would go with the Westcott 30" silver/white square reflector.
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …lver_White_Refl​ector.html (external link)

Anyone used this reflector?

Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,954 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
Which of those three light panels to get?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1665 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.