Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 05 Jun 2009 (Friday) 21:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Epson Stylus R1900 vs pixima pro9000 mark ii

 
dgoakill
Senior Member
Avatar
304 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Philadelphia
     
Jun 05, 2009 21:01 |  #1

I'm in need of a new printer and money is an issue. My limit is $500. I have currently an HP Design jet that's around 5-6 years old. great printer, but lately it's having a hard time grabbing the heavier papers and pushing them through leaving a lot of misprints, color bleeds etc. Works great for regular paper and documents.

Anyway, both these models are the same price and I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on which was better. I'm looking for opinions on their B+W photo quality as that is most important to me right now. Color is fine, but I've read that certain inks are better for B+W than others.

thanks.


Gear: Camera & Computer
Portfolio (external link) | Blog (external link) |
Instagram (external link)flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 05, 2009 21:18 |  #2

I'm a big fan of this class in Canon printers.. I got the i9100, (Canon's 13" wide printer of 3 generations back..) and it is still running strong.

My Brother in law got the Pro 9000 and I am amazed by this machine.. same price as the i9100 was, but it's so much more advanced!

Can't help with the B&W question though I'm afraid, just wanted to drop a plug for the Canon.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jun 05, 2009 22:12 |  #3

The Canon will only do 19". The Epson should do 38" (or more).


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grimes
Goldmember
1,323 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
     
Jun 06, 2009 01:18 |  #4

Hey, I have the Pro9000, and the color prints it produces are fantastic - really nice!

BW prints turn out good, but I'm not jumping up and down over them. If BW is your main concern, I would look for one of the printers that is more focused towards that niche.


Alex
5DMKII | 85 f/1.8 | 17-40L f/4 | 24-105 f/4 IS | 40 f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Jun 06, 2009 02:50 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

Tony-S wrote in post #8058500 (external link)
The Canon will only do 19". The Epson should do 38" (or more).

You got that back to front, tony.

I think the 1900 only does 13 or so, actually, come to think of it.

The canon 9000 is a beast, I think it does 60"


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jun 06, 2009 08:15 |  #6

According to their respective web sites, the Canon does 13x19 and the Epson does 13x44 inches.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dgoakill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
304 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Philadelphia
     
Jun 06, 2009 21:24 as a reply to  @ Tony-S's post |  #7

well I went with the epson R1900. WOW! color is amazing, B+W is excellent for the money. both are 100 times better than my old hp 1220 designjet.


Gear: Camera & Computer
Portfolio (external link) | Blog (external link) |
Instagram (external link)flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 07, 2009 16:54 |  #8

Tony-S wrote in post #8058500 (external link)
The Canon will only do 19". The Epson should do 38" (or more).

they are both 13 wide printers.

The standard papers for 13" wide max out at 19" long.

None have a roll feed attachment but The canon most certainly will (and I am sure the epson will too) print to longer than 19".. they have a place in the driver for you to input the paper length.

If you ahev paper longer than 19" you can tell the printer to print to that size.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jun 07, 2009 17:44 |  #9

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #8066839 (external link)
they are both 13 wide printers. The standard papers for 13" wide max out at 19" long.

Red River sells 13" x 38" sheets.

None have a roll feed attachment but The canon most certainly will (and I am sure the epson will too) print to longer than 19".. they have a place in the driver for you to input the paper length. If you ahev paper longer than 19" you can tell the printer to print to that size.

The Epson takes up to 44" sheets. I did a little digging on the Canon support pages and here's the support info for the Pro9000 II:

The printer can handle paper sizes in the range of:
Front Feeder - 3.50 to 14.00 in for width and 5.00 to 26.61 in for height

Rear Tray - 3.50 to 12.95 in for width and 5.00 to 26.61 in for height

If a size is selected that is outside of the ranges above, there is no error, but the size and orientation of the printed image will be unpredictable.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Jun 07, 2009 17:45 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

Tony-S wrote in post #8060015 (external link)
According to their respective web sites, the Canon does 13x19 and the Epson does 13x44 inches.

Oh, I figured you meant by the first number (width opposed to length)

I think I'm thinking of the canon 9000i..


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sue.t
Goldmember
Avatar
1,172 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 196
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Yukon, Canada
     
Jun 07, 2009 19:25 |  #11

The same two printers I considered. I read a lot of reviews of the two, and the Canon was rated better for black & white, while the Epson had better ratings for colour prints. I went with the Epson because colour was most important to me.

Other than that, it was a "six of one, half dozen of the other" kind of thing.


-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jun 07, 2009 20:19 |  #12

I also like black and white. I have 2 printers, the newest one a Canon 9000 Pro. I didn't really want another pigment ink printer (I was replacing an Epson R2400 that gave up the ghost). I wanted either the Canon 9500 Pro or the Epson R2880, but as I said, I didn't want a pigment ink printer and both of those are. The 9500 Pro uses 3 different types of black/gray ink and does B & W nicer than the 9000 Pro which has only one. One of the reasons I got the 9000 Pro was that I also have a HP 7160 which can use 4 different blacks/grays ink and does a great job with B & W. It just does not print wider than 8.5" paper and is slow.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the_weird_one
Member
Avatar
169 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Birmingham, England
     
Jun 08, 2009 06:53 |  #13

I've got the R1900 and love it - and been in the UK it comes with the roll attachment love the colours and love the black and white prints from it though it can be a bit hard to find a paper stock outside of Epson's own that you like printing on.


| Canon EOS 7D + Battery Grip | Canon Speedlite 430EX II | Canon 24-105 f4L IS USM | Canon 100mm f2.8L Macro IS USM | Canon EF 50mm f1.8 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM | Sigma 70-200 f2.8 APO EX DG OS | Tamron SP 24-70 f2.8 Di VC USD |
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dgoakill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
304 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Philadelphia
     
Jun 08, 2009 08:31 as a reply to  @ the_weird_one's post |  #14

I'm in the US and my R1900 also came with the roll attachment. I went with the epson because of the paper variety available with the epson inks. I've been using the Brilliant papers, specifically the Supreme Luster.
http://brilliantpaper.​com/ (external link)

I've never liked the results I've got with the epson papers. with my old hp 1220 I used the Illford art papers and really liked the quality over the HP or Epson papers. At work I have an Epson Stylus Pro 4000 it takes 17" Rolls and even with that much higher end printer we had better results with the Brillant papers over the Epsons. So for me it works out because I can always "borrow" from our paper stock at work in a pinch.;)


Gear: Camera & Computer
Portfolio (external link) | Blog (external link) |
Instagram (external link)flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 08, 2009 10:37 |  #15

Edit for my Error,. the Epson r1900 does handle roll papers (as mentioned above)
I was thinking of a totally different older Epson.

That is a great feature for the price!


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,525 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Epson Stylus R1900 vs pixima pro9000 mark ii
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1029 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.