Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 Jun 2009 (Sunday) 13:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Buying a printer question

 
slappy ­ sam
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Plymouth, MA
     
Jun 07, 2009 13:38 |  #1

I have always toyed around with the idea of buying a printer, however I do this semi professionally and don't print enough that I think this really warrants it. However, I actually don't have a printer at all right now which is kinda of a PITA. I send to whcc to get printed, and they do a good job.

But, I do small orders. For example, one woman just asked if she could get 3 5x7s and an 8x10. This is going to be under $12 so I have to pay extra to ship from whcc. I could use mpix or something I guess, but I still have to deal with the wait times and excess packaging they always use (waste). Looking to cut down on that waste.

Could I get similar results from a $200-400 printer (max I'd go is the epson 1900)? I could use a lab for the 16x20s and 20x30s, and print the rest at home. However, if I get a more pricey printer like the 1900 then will I run into problems with the ink cartridges drying out/losing ink/clogging? I only print once a month or so (photos), and also would this printer be okay to print documents with or should it not be doing that?

If anyone could recommend a 4/5 in 1 printer that is small and produces good photo prints, that would probably be ideal for me. I'm looking for something that will be similar in quality to the lab. I am selling these prints, and they aren't too cheap so I don't want to give less than professional quality results. However, I don't want to have to deal with a 3 day wait time and a bunch of hassle with packaging and such, just to get a few 5x7s. I have grown tired of this.


40D|10-20|17-50|70-200|580ex
FS: XT with 2 OEM batteries

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jun 07, 2009 14:19 |  #2

The important thing is to have a display calibrater, and to buy paper that has profiles available for your printer. If you do this, then you've got 95% of your color management in place. I use Red River papers because the provide downloadable profiles for my i9900. I make sure to do one color print at least at monthly intervals to prevent nozzle clogging.

The Canon MP980 is a pretty decent printer for color and b&w.

Alternatively, you could use Wal-Mart or Walgreen's for such a few number of prints. They're cheap, color managed and do a reasonable job for quick prints.

Right now, Office Max has the Epson 1900 for less than $200. Pretty much a steal.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slappy ­ sam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Plymouth, MA
     
Jun 07, 2009 18:00 |  #3

I couldn't find the 1900 at officemax less than $200. Found the 1400 for like $180 but I haven't heard as much about that printer.

The mp980 is an option, I kinda want to go with epson just because I feel that their printers are better (I've had not so great experiences with canon printers...) but I don't really know much about printers so I'm open to either.

I have a calibrated acd 20" which should be pretty spot on - has been with my whcc prints. I would make sure to get proper profiles for the paper.

I just wonder how much of a waste it is for me to get a 1900 or similarly priced/intense printer when I'm not printing that much. Also, its fairly large. And I wonder if the quality on a 4 in 1 is going to suffer compared to the whcc prints. I can't be putting out prints that aren't high quality.

Also, will the 1900 print documents...? Or is it strictly a photo printer?

And I am not going to be using walmart/walgreens because of a few things. There isn't one close to me (closest is about 15-20min) and therefore its going to be a lot of gas/time to go there. And I would rather get pro quality from whcc if I'm going to be outsourcing anyway. The thing I like about having my own printer is that if I don't like the result, I can just adjust some settings and print out another. Right now with whcc, I have to wait 2-3 days to see the product. That hasn't been a problem thus far, but I think that it is much more convenient for me to be printing at home, it just makes more sense in general.

If possible, I'd like to spend $150-200 and get a nice, small, 4 in 1 printer that will output professional level prints. I am fine with tweaking calibration/printer profiles, and getting quality paper. But if the printer sucks, none of that will matter because I still won't get good results...


40D|10-20|17-50|70-200|580ex
FS: XT with 2 OEM batteries

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jun 07, 2009 22:16 |  #4

If you start with this message on dpreview:

http://forums.dpreview​.com …rum=1003&messag​e=26395526 (external link)

and follow the various responses, you might get a good idea of what's involved with the Epson 1900 -- a customer happy with the print quality but, as is usual for inexpensive photo printers, it uses small ink cartridges for more expense. However, if you print just occasionally, that might not be a big issue.

For document printing, though, using photo ink can be a waste compared to a cheap all-purpose printer. I have an old reliable inkjet that takes large inexpensive cartridges and keeps on ticking, whereas my photo printing is done on a dedicated photo printer.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jun 08, 2009 14:58 |  #5

slappy sam wrote in post #8067149 (external link)
I couldn't find the 1900 at officemax less than $200.

But you CAN find the HP B8550. Before drinking the Epson KoolAid... take a look at it.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Jun 08, 2009 15:22 as a reply to  @ ChasP505's post |  #6

I thought epson was a great idea, until I burned through nearly a whole set of ink cleaning a clogged head. HP (and a few others) give you a new head on every cartridge so this is almost never a problem.

I also think pure color calibration is less critical since you are comparing sending to outside labs anyway. Your monitor is not calibrated perfectly to their printer either. Just do a few eyeball tests and if the are as close as your lab prints, then you are in good shape.

One more option - for small batches is there a local printer anywhere? They may be more per print, but less overall factoring in shipping. Jeez, for 3 5x7's and an 8x10, just head over to the Kodak kiosk at the drug store.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jun 08, 2009 15:52 |  #7

Oops, yeah, that was the 1400 at Office Max. Sorry...


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slappy ­ sam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Plymouth, MA
     
Jun 08, 2009 17:39 as a reply to  @ Tony-S's post |  #8

ChasP505 wrote in post #8072505 (external link)
But you CAN find the HP B8550. Before drinking the Epson KoolAid... take a look at it.

Okay, but I have had nothing less than horrible experiences with hp printers.

tkbslc wrote in post #8072666 (external link)
I thought epson was a great idea, until I burned through nearly a whole set of ink cleaning a clogged head. HP (and a few others) give you a new head on every cartridge so this is almost never a problem.

I also think pure color calibration is less critical since you are comparing sending to outside labs anyway. Your monitor is not calibrated perfectly to their printer either. Just do a few eyeball tests and if the are as close as your lab prints, then you are in good shape.

One more option - for small batches is there a local printer anywhere? They may be more per print, but less overall factoring in shipping. Jeez, for 3 5x7's and an 8x10, just head over to the Kodak kiosk at the drug store.

Yeah, I hear you about the clogged heads issue, well I'll look into other brands as well of course.

Nah, no local printer anywhere. I really would like to print at home anyway, and I do more prints than that its just that I got that small order yesterday and it sparked my thinking... why don't I just get my own printer?


40D|10-20|17-50|70-200|580ex
FS: XT with 2 OEM batteries

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jun 08, 2009 18:05 |  #9

slappy sam wrote in post #8073424 (external link)
Okay, but I have had nothing less than horrible experiences with hp printers.

...Yeah, I hear you about the clogged heads issue, well I'll look into other brands as well of course.

What's left by process of elimination? :rolleyes:

slappy sam wrote in post #8073424 (external link)
Nah, no local printer anywhere.

I find that hard to accept.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slappy ­ sam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Plymouth, MA
     
Jun 08, 2009 18:12 |  #10

ChasP505 wrote in post #8073560 (external link)
What's left by process of elimination? :rolleyes:
I'm saying I'll check them out, but I haven't had good experiences with hp printers. Canon is another brand I am looking at and would prefer over hp.

I find that hard to accept.

Well, there is a local drug store that does prints but they only do 4x6 (I went in to get two 5x7s done and the guy was telling me that the automated machine can only do 4x6 print sizes - its one of those machines that prints it on the spot and everything). And, I live in a town with one stop light that doesn't allow any chain businesses in to the town, except for a dunkin donuts which isn't allowed to have any signage. So... there really isn't anything until 10-15 minutes from my house.


40D|10-20|17-50|70-200|580ex
FS: XT with 2 OEM batteries

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Jun 08, 2009 18:16 |  #11

You are like an hour out of Boston and there is no where to get prints? Don't you even have a drugstore, costco, etc? That seems unlikely, but I will take your word for it.

And as far as built in printheads, HP, some Canon, and Lexmark are your options. Not sure about any recommendations, though. Lexmarks are not great IMO.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
halitime
Goldmember
Avatar
1,271 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Lantzville B.C. Can.
     
Jun 08, 2009 18:36 |  #12

I bought an Epson RX580 a couple of years ago,it has worked flawlessly and still produces beautiful prints.It uses Epson Claria Ink which is supposed to maintain colour longer and as far as paper goes I use Epson or Staples.


Gear List : 1D MK II n,Gripped XSi,70-200 f4,300 f4 IS,Canon 24-105 f4,35 f2 IS,EF 50 1.8 MK I,EF-S 10-22,Canon 1.4 II Extender,Canon 25mm Ext Tube,YN 468/460 II,RF 602's
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/halitime/sets/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,979 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Buying a printer question
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1708 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.