Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 Jun 2009 (Sunday) 17:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Samsung SyncMaster 266BW

 
BigAlz1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere Great!
     
Jun 07, 2009 17:28 |  #1

Anyone out there have this monitor. I think this monitor is ok for editing photos but I am sure not the best. It's a 2ns 22" LCD and my biggest issue is brightness. I have calibrated this monitor the best I can without spending money for a pro tool.
If anyone has this monitor or has an opinion about it, and if someone has an opinion about a better monitor please chime in. I am a starting portrait/candid photographer but I am quiet anal about accuracy.

Thanks




Eos 7D, 40D w/70-200L 2.8 IS, 50mm 1.4, Nifty Fifty II, 100MM 2.8 Macro, 18-135mm IS , Sigma 30mm 1.4 , Sigma 18-35 1.8 ART 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Salenger
Goldmember
Avatar
1,681 posts
Likes: 39
Joined May 2008
Location: Virginia
     
Jun 07, 2009 18:43 |  #2

You will achieve the best results if you spring for a calibration device. Spyder III
is affordable and does a good job. There is more adjustments than brightness
that will transfer to your prints, the Spyder II will make these adjustments so
you will get an accurate print that closely matches what you see when you edit.
http://www.amazon.com …61&ref=pd_sl_9m​a8kfzmf7_b (external link)
I read the review on Amazon, and was quite suprised at the fellow's difficulty. The included software
was rather simple and straight foreward and instructs you step by step for installation (you just run the
disc) and click. The suction cup he referred to, is for glass front CRT monitors.


I may not be the village idiot, but I'll do until
he gets here.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ctcks
Member
Avatar
145 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jun 08, 2009 12:35 as a reply to  @ James Salenger's post |  #3

Before you buy a Spyder or Huey or whatever, check out this link for the Samsung monitor support site. You can download a proper calibration profile for your monitor. Then you can select the resulting profile as your monitor profile in Lightroom or DPP. I noticed that once I had my printer profile selcted based for the photo paper I was using, and then my monitor profile selected (the downloaded one), my printed pictures were right on. Hope this helps. Oh yeah, I have the Samsung Syncmaster 931B. Hope this helps: http://www.samsung.com …itors/magictune​/index.htm (external link)


Camera: Canon 5D, Canon EOS 40D
Glass: Canon 24-105mm f4; Canon 50mm 1.8; Tamron 17-50 2.8; Sigma (macro) 28-80 3.5-5.6; Sigma 100-300 4-5.6; .
Flash: Canon Speedlite 580EX II, Canon Speedlite 430EX II
www.dailyaudiobible.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fanorama
Member
209 posts
Joined May 2009
     
Jun 08, 2009 14:44 |  #4

James Salenger wrote in post #8067394 (external link)
You will achieve the best results if you spring for a calibration device. Spyder III
is affordable and does a good job. There is more adjustments than brightness
that will transfer to your prints, the Spyder II will make these adjustments so
you will get an accurate print that closely matches what you see when you edit.
http://www.amazon.com …61&ref=pd_sl_9m​a8kfzmf7_b (external link)
I read the review on Amazon, and was quite suprised at the fellow's difficulty. The included software
was rather simple and straight foreward and instructs you step by step for installation (you just run the
disc) and click. The suction cup he referred to, is for glass front CRT monitors.

I've just read the review too.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jun 08, 2009 14:50 |  #5

ctcks wrote in post #8071647 (external link)
You can download a proper calibration profile for your monitor.

It's not a "calibration" profile. You can get the standard display profile for your Samsung, but certain models of Samsung LCDs are notorious for having bad display profiles which cause bad color shifts in Photoshop. On all my uncalibrated Samsung monitors, I use the default sRGB profile as the display profile. Of course, when you actually calibrate your monitor, you'll be using the custom profile you created.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Jun 08, 2009 15:06 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Nope, don't ever use the color management for your monitor, it will end up looking weird, in the color management of your computer, select the sRGB as your default




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jun 08, 2009 15:43 |  #7

400dabuser wrote in post #8072570 (external link)
Nope, don't ever use the color management for your monitor, it will end up looking weird, in the color management of your computer, select the sRGB as your default

I'm not talking about using the monitor profile as the RGB working space in Photoshop Color Settings. I'm talking about using the display profile provided by Samsung as the default system display profile. You won't notice anything different in Windows or IE, but when you open an image file in Photoshop, you'll get a terrible color cast. So I suggest setting the default sRGB profile as the default system display profile in Windows until you can build a custom calibration profile.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Jun 08, 2009 15:48 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

ChasP505 wrote in post #8072784 (external link)
I'm not talking about using the monitor profile as the RGB working space in Photoshop Color Settings. I'm talking about using the display profile provided by Samsung as the default system display profile. You won't notice anything different in Windows or IE, but when you open an image file in Photoshop, you'll get a terrible color cast. So I suggest setting the default sRGB profile as the default system display profile in Windows until you can build a custom calibration profile.


The display profile supplied by samsung messed up my viewing qualities

I normally use Adobe RGB when using Photoshop




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jun 08, 2009 15:51 |  #9

400dabuser wrote in post #8072818 (external link)
I normally use Adobe RGB when using Photoshop

You set your system default display profile to Adobe RGB?


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAlz1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere Great!
     
Jun 08, 2009 23:01 |  #10

I have things all set close to par, I have my colors, and brightness/contrast set well and everything I edit looks same on print as does in Photoshop and IE.
I was really looking for more of a monitor upgrade suggestion then anything.
BTW, I use AdobeRGB too. I use that profile on my camera/monitor/Photosh​op/DPP and my printer and everything comes out just as I edit it. I have even had a pro lab print my work and again right on par.
Is there a better way?




Eos 7D, 40D w/70-200L 2.8 IS, 50mm 1.4, Nifty Fifty II, 100MM 2.8 Macro, 18-135mm IS , Sigma 30mm 1.4 , Sigma 18-35 1.8 ART 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Jun 08, 2009 23:13 |  #11

ctcks wrote in post #8071647 (external link)
Before you buy a Spyder or Huey or whatever, check out this link for the Samsung monitor support site. You can download a proper calibration profile for your monitor.

If the correct profile could simply be downloaded off a web site then the manufacturer would have included that profile with the driver and there would be no need to download anything. The color output changes over time and that's why you should buy a calibration tool and use it on a regular basis to keep things adjusted correctly.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jun 09, 2009 07:33 |  #12

BigAlz1 wrote in post #8075129 (external link)
I was really looking for more of a monitor upgrade suggestion then anything.

OK then... There's a long thread in the Computer section about the Dell 2209WA, an IPS display for those of us on a restrictive budget. I believe you can still get one for the special price of $212 USD shipped. Keep the 266BW around as a second monitor for video gaming and to contain your PS palettes as you edit photos in full screen on the Dell.

BigAlz1 wrote in post #8075129 (external link)
BTW, I use AdobeRGB too. I use that profile on my camera/monitor/Photosh​op/DPP and my printer and everything comes out just as I edit it. I have even had a pro lab print my work and again right on par.
Is there a better way?

The monitor profile and your chosen color workspace for photo editing are two different things. But if the monitor profile is corrupt, then Photoshop will not render colors accurately.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,337 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Samsung SyncMaster 266BW
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1258 guests, 181 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.