Sydnie&Adison Mostly Lurking 12 posts Joined Apr 2007 More info | Jun 08, 2009 09:31 | #1 I missed the focus just a bit - I did sharpen some in photoshop - just wondering how this will look if I have it printed - with the out of focus eyes be obvious?  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 08, 2009 09:40 | #2 depends on the size...i think it will be fine for like a 5x7..unless people really start starring at it they probably wont notice Canon 7d and a Bunch of other sh*t
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TTk Goldmember  2,518 posts Likes: 4 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Langtoft. England. More info | I agree 5x7 should be fine. Terry.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bsaber I have no idea what's going on  3,536 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Jun 08, 2009 20:15 | #4 You might be able to get away with an 8x10 but 5x7 would be your safest bet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jgoodstein Senior Member 320 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Earth > N. America > Florida More info | Jun 08, 2009 20:28 | #5 a good b&W conversion seems to allow for OOF a bit more to me at least. but +1 to the 5X7
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hawk911 Cream of the Crop  More info | Jun 10, 2009 11:12 | #6 I say it will print just as OOF as this one. You can't sharpen it enough to make it acceptable, for me anyway. Can you head swap from another picture? HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rhinotherunt Looking for a Rock  7,129 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Jasper, AL More info | Jun 10, 2009 12:00 | #7 Make it look intentional. Ryan McGill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FLiPMaRC Senior Member  967 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2006 Location: NJ More info | Jun 10, 2009 15:20 | #8 jgoodstein wrote in post #8074291  a good b&W conversion seems to allow for OOF a bit more to me at least. but +1 to the 5X7 I think there's a rule to convert OOF shots to B&W
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Jun 10, 2009 22:40 | #9 I would shoot again. Arm is cut off in half. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Jun 11, 2009 00:49 | #10 Don't wanna sound unhelpful, but why not try printing it instead of having us guess. Go get a 20 cent 4x6 and then if that looks good move up from there. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewHicksPhotography Goldmember  2,552 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada More info | Jun 11, 2009 01:00 | #11 4x6 would be pushing it for me, but I'm fairly demanding. Calgary Wedding Photography by Matthew Hicks: www.matthicksphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Federkeil Senior Member 283 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2006 More info | Jun 12, 2009 12:50 | #12 It pains me to get a perfect expression, and be oof, but I would delete it. Don't show the customer, then they won't miss it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2138 guests, 97 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
Like a soft focus effect.
