Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 10 Jun 2009 (Wednesday) 13:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

canon half-ass service.......

 
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jun 10, 2009 13:42 |  #1

man i am pissed.

i sent my 1ds mark III to canon in irvine last week because the shutter is splattering oil on the sensor.

at first, i tried to deal with the issue locally by having the sensor cleaned 3x at a cost of about $150. i also wasted about $50 on swabs trying to clean the oil off myself so let's call it 200 bucks.

yesterday i got the camera back from irvine and i waited until today to do the f22 sky test ..... because i just knew i wasn't going to be happy when i saw the results.

and today i am not.

the sensor tho cleaner, is still filthy, and so i have to wonder if the service hack also did a half-ass job on cleaning the shutter mechanism that was the subject of the service notice?

and you probably know what i think!

i called the service center and i let estella have it. to her credit she offered to send me a label and have the camera overnighted and then mail it back to me even in coeur d'alene, where we will eventually land but who wants to go through all that hassle?

so i'll take the camera on vacation and i'll have to use the clone and healing tool on every stopped down picture i process just like i have had to do since day one.

i should also note that when i have had the sensor cleaned locally there wasn't one single visible dust spot @ f22 viewed @ 100% but off course the next time i use the camera there are oil splatters.

in the past i have only had praise for canon service but today they are at the top of my sh*t list. i just can't believe a canon service hack could not return my camera with a clean sensor and i have to conclude -- but will confirm later -- that he did a half ass job on the rest of the service.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LBaldwin
Goldmember
Avatar
4,490 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
Location: San Jose,CA
     
Jun 10, 2009 13:53 |  #2

Sorry to hear this Ed, serious hassle. I would seriously rattle their cage. Can any of the local reps assist? That is about the only thing I can think of. If you need a contact name and phone number let me know (via PM please), but it may muddy the water even more.

Canon has a huge building on North First st. and I know some of the photo reps work out of there. They have helped me in the past but not with anything related to your issue.


Les Baldwin
http://www.fotosfx.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Jun 10, 2009 14:01 |  #3

Hmmm, you're lucky to get half-assed service. I'm so used to quarter-assed service that half-assed would be an improvement! In any case that sucks to hear.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
summerwind4
Senior Member
537 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Fresno,CA
     
Jun 10, 2009 14:03 as a reply to  @ LBaldwin's post |  #4

you have every right to be pi$$ed about this Ed.
they can do better than that and we all who have sent anything to Irvine know it.
my 24-70 took 2 trips, 1 to fix the loose focus ring, and 2nd time to clean all the dirt out from repair 1.

then at times we get exactly what we asked for.

hope this 2nd attempt resolves this for ya............


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jun 10, 2009 15:01 |  #5

LBaldwin wrote in post #8085034 (external link)
Sorry to hear this Ed, serious hassle. I would seriously rattle their cage. Can any of the local reps assist? That is about the only thing I can think of. If you need a contact name and phone number let me know (via PM please), but it may muddy the water even more.

Canon has a huge building on North First st. and I know some of the photo reps work out of there. They have helped me in the past but not with anything related to your issue.

Les -- thanx. when i get back from vacation i'll send the camera in and if it's not perfect next time i'll PM you.

right now i'm in acceptance that there's nothing i can do except what i've been doing since the day i got this camera... clone out the dark spots.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Jun 10, 2009 15:09 |  #6

Considering what I have heard about Canon Canada, I have no intentions of sending my 5D in for the mirror fix.

I sent my 40D a couple of weeks ago, with the excuse that the focusing was not always right on. Actually an excuse to send it in before the warranty expired for a once over.

I would have thought they would have least cleaned the viewfinder/sensor/anyt​hing. Nope. Just sent it back with the "performs to specification" work order. They received it on a Thursday, completed on a Tuesday.

PS: They sent it back in he same packaging and padding that I used. They probably didn't even look at it.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Jun 10, 2009 15:14 |  #7

bohdank wrote in post #8085542 (external link)
I would have thought they would have least cleaned the viewfinder/sensor/anyt​hing. Nope. Just sent it back with the "performs to specification" work order. They received it on a Thursday, completed on a Tuesday.

PS: They sent it back in he same packaging and padding that I used. They probably didn't even look at it.

I'm sorry, but this seems a bit petty. You sent in a working camera and they looked at it and confirmed that is was working. They even had the audacity to re-use your packing materials instead of throwing them away and wasting resources on new ones? The horror!! I think the OP has a valid complaint, but you are just bummed you couldn't scam your way into a free cleaning. That is not really a valid complaint in my mind.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jun 10, 2009 15:17 |  #8

bohdank wrote in post #8085542 (external link)
Considering what I have heard about Canon Canada, I have no intentions of sending my 5D in for the mirror fix.

I sent my 40D a couple of weeks ago, with the excuse that the focusing was not always right on. Actually an excuse to send it in before the warranty expired for a once over.

I would have thought they would have least cleaned the viewfinder/sensor/anyt​hing. Nope. Just sent it back with the "performs to specification" work order. They received it on a Thursday, completed on a Tuesday.

PS: They sent it back in he same packaging and padding that I used. They probably didn't even look at it.

i think canon irvine has a better reputation than that :D.

you know to admit your flagship DSLR is defective because of a overly-lubricated shutter mechanism is humbling but the responsible thing to do.

but to return that camera from service with spots on the sensor is flat-out insulting.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,098 posts
Gallery: 127 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 449
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Switzerland
     
Jun 10, 2009 15:26 |  #9

Ed, was that on the recall?


Canon : EOS R : 5DIV : 5DS R : 5DIII : 7DII : 40 2.8 : 50 1.4 : 35L : 85L : 100L IS Macro : 135L : 16-35L II : RF-24-105L IS : 70-200L II : 100-400L IS II : 1.4x & 2x TC III : 600EX-RT : 580EX : 430EX : G1XII : Markins Q10 & Q3T : Jobu Gimbal : Manfrotto Underware : etc...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 10, 2009 15:30 |  #10

Should have got a Sigma ....

Bummer man,. hope they get it right this time.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jun 10, 2009 15:35 |  #11

John_T wrote in post #8085676 (external link)
Ed, was that on the recall?

canon issued a service notice about oil splatters and said they would service these camera under warranty....so i guess that's a recall.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tyreman
Goldmember
1,085 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Cambridge,Ontario,Canada
     
Jun 10, 2009 15:40 |  #12

Thats a tough break.

Unfortunately today this is seeming to be getting more commonplace with items.:(

And of course in your case what is the ultimate final repair procedure to correct the problem?


Cambridge, ON.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jun 10, 2009 15:47 |  #13

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #8085695 (external link)
Should have got a Sigma ....


Bummer man,. hope they get it right this time.

yeah right :D.

it's been a bad service week for me. i went in for a root canal on monday, and immediately i became concerned when the doctor wasn't listening to me.

i told her i wasn't numb enough enough but she had to verify that with a drill bit to an exposed nerve. she gave me a few more shots hit the nerve again and then i could see she was getting frustrated.

she said i needed to relax but by this time my heart was hammering and i was starting to hyperventilate. she gave me more shots and then stuck the metal probe into the nerve and i screamed and about came out of the seat.

she then gave me a shot directly into the nerve and said the only way she could get me numb was too expose more nerve and then more shots into the nerve. i'll tell you, after the first shot in the nerve there was just no way i could voluntarily subject myself to that again.

i felt like i was being waterboarded and i honestly believe that the adrenalin was cancelling the affects of the painkiller.

she left me for about five minutes and i decided i had had it.

she came back and said, "there's going to be more pain but we're almost there." this was more than an hour into the procedure.

"i'm finished" i told her. "please but a filling in the tooth so i can leave."

so i'm going on vacation probably without my root canal and possibly with a sensor that's still throwing oil on my sensor.

yeah it was a bad service week :D!

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bauerman
discount on value meals
3,457 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Idaho!
     
Jun 10, 2009 15:54 |  #14

Big time sucks on the oily sensor.......but the silver lining is that you are coming to what has to be THE most beautiful state in the Union - IDAHO. Photo ops abound in the Coeur D' Alene area. Have a blast up there.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jun 10, 2009 15:55 |  #15

bauerman wrote in post #8085816 (external link)
Big time sucks on the oily sensor.......but the silver lining is that you are coming to what has to be THE most beautiful state in the Union - IDAHO. Photo ops abound in the Coeur D' Alene area. Have a blast up there.

we're there for the ironman....how does that event impact the city? i already know how it impacts the rents ;).

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

16,913 views & 0 likes for this thread, 59 members have posted to it.
canon half-ass service.......
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1844 guests, 112 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.