If you had a 5D and an EF 24-70 Lens, are there any reasons you would still need the 50mm?
Thank you.
Photo1812 Junior Member 21 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Jun 11, 2009 12:07 | #1 If you had a 5D and an EF 24-70 Lens, are there any reasons you would still need the 50mm?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Jun 11, 2009 12:08 | #2 |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | What he said
LOG IN TO REPLY |
prinspaul Senior Member 475 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Holland More info | Jun 11, 2009 12:16 | #4 Primes give a different feeling to your pictures, due to the large F-stops.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | I would love the 24-70L, and I could afford one if I sell my 85 and 30 primes, but once I look at a shot at 30mm @ f/1.4, I realize I could NEVER sell them....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Marloon Goldmember 4,323 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC. More info | Jun 11, 2009 12:18 | #6 its sad that the 50mm f1.4 is soft at f1.4-f1.8 Which is the main reason why i went and sold the 50mm f1.4 I'm MARLON
LOG IN TO REPLY |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | ^ +1 on the Sigma! Plus REAL HSM (~USM)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
prinspaul Senior Member 475 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Holland More info | Jun 11, 2009 12:20 | #8 Marloon wrote in post #8090862 its sad that the 50mm f1.4 is soft at f1.4-f1.8 Which is the main reason why i went and sold the 50mm f1.4 If you are going to get a 50mm f1.4, get the sigma 50mm f1.4 do not dismiss the 50L:p
LOG IN TO REPLY |
[Hyuni] Goldmember 1,186 posts Likes: 15 Joined Dec 2008 Location: CHiCAGO More info | Jun 11, 2009 12:20 | #9 Marloon knows what's up. Sigma makes THE best 50 1.4 6D Rokinon 14 f/2.8 l EF 35 ƒ1.4L l EF 135 ƒ2.0L l EF 70-200 ƒ2.8L IS II l YN460 l 580EX II l Flick'd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Jun 11, 2009 12:23 | #10 The 50L is a problematic lens. Too many reports of focus shift with change in aperture. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CanonHowitzer Senior Member 304 posts Joined Aug 2008 Location: Texas More info | 50mm is the least useful focal lengh for me, even back in the film days. EOS 50D, 17-55/2.8, 85mm/1.8, 70-200mm/f4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
prinspaul Senior Member 475 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Holland More info | Jun 11, 2009 12:25 | #12 50mm with your 50D with be like 80mm though....quite an useful FL if ur asking me...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
anthony11 Goldmember 2,148 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | Jun 11, 2009 13:21 | #13 Permanently[Hyuni wrote: ='[Hyuni];8090872']Marloon knows what's up. Sigma makes THE best 50 1.4 It's bigger, heavier, and more expensive too. The choice among the 50's depends in part on what aspects are how important. 5D2, 24-105L, 85mm f/1.8, MP960, HG21, crumbling G6+R72, Brownian toddler
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1740 guests, 132 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||