And yet your focus test chart shot shows maybe 2-4mm, odd.
toxic Goldmember 3,498 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2008 Location: California More info | Jun 15, 2009 02:46 | #17 BigAlz1 wrote in post #8111196 Same image lol, Here is a "real" world shot to show how I can't take sharp pictures like I need too. This is a tripod mounted shot. The knee I focused on is the furthest point toward me. The other knee, crouch and hand that are in focus are 1 and 1/2 inches away from my focus point! The subject is about 35 inches away from the camera. Make sure the lens wasn't running into MFD (33.5 in). I find it strange that it would be off a couple mm on a chart, but 30mm in a "real" shot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 15, 2009 04:24 | #18 Send it back. You know that it does not work, why ask this lot? Skewed or not you can see the problem. http://natureimmortal.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tmonatr Goldmember 1,585 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Tennessee More info | Jun 15, 2009 05:21 | #19 toxic wrote in post #8111700 Make sure the lens wasn't running into MFD (33.5 in). That's what I was thinking. The 85 1.8 is definitely no macro lens. Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jman13 Cream of the Crop 5,567 posts Likes: 164 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Columbus, OH More info | Jun 15, 2009 05:39 | #20 You are focusing in that 'real world' test shot on something that is very small on the focus point. Do realize that the actual focus sensor is much larger than the square on the viewfinder. It's very easy for the AF to lock on something behind the focus point when the focus point is on something small. Shoot something with a little more substance to it and see what your results are. Jordan Steele - http://www.jsteelephotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 15, 2009 05:41 | #21 Send it back again. Sony A1, 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II, 70-200mm F/2.8 GM OSS II, 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS, 35mm f/1.4 GM, Viltrox 16mm f/1.8, 1.4X TC, Flashpoint flashes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SuzyView Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 15, 2009 05:55 | #22 Let's take it outside for a test spin on a person. That will tell us a lot about the focus issue. Before sending it back in, that's what I would do as the 85 1.8 is not a macro lens and needs a certain distance to get it right. Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vadim_c Senior Member 716 posts Joined Feb 2009 More info | Permanent banI do not know what you do but the fact that two shots of a focusing charts were so different ( one is removed now) and especially the fact that the photo that is still remaining in the original posts show almost no backfocus while the figure on the shelf displays a huge backfosus can only point to the user error. There is a smal chance that the camera plays tricks with you but that is highly improbable.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Crashoran Goldmember 1,734 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Austin,Texas More info | Jun 15, 2009 12:27 | #24 User error.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.Horton worship my useful and insightful comments More info | Jun 15, 2009 12:32 | #25 Call Canon and ask what's next. They may want you to send the body in with the lens. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike55 Goldmember 4,206 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | Jun 15, 2009 12:36 | #26 Save yourself months of misery and wasted time and just save up for a body with micro adjust. That's the only real solution to this common issue. 6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hiddengamer7 Senior Member 259 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Kansas City More info | Jun 15, 2009 12:41 | #27 How about just use it? I've seen way too many threads on back focusing. My 24-70 and my Sigma 30mm are both "back focused" but still produce excellent images when I'm not obsessed with "tack sharp focus" and more concerned about what I'm taking a picture of. Just get out and have fun with it, 2mm of back focus is nothing, but because you are obsessed with it, you arent enjoying the lens. -Will
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alt4852 Goldmember 3,419 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Northern Virginia More info | i'd consider it mostly user error. the lens may be back focusing slightly, but as others have stated, if your chart shows a few millimeters of backfocus and your controlled test shows an inch and a half.. you as the user are not doing something right. 5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vadim_c Senior Member 716 posts Joined Feb 2009 More info | Jun 15, 2009 13:54 | #29 Permanent banMike55 wrote in post #8113883 Save yourself months of misery and wasted time and just save up for a body with micro adjust. That's the only real solution to this common issue. Is it ?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SQMazda6 Senior Member 457 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Plainfield IL More info | Jun 15, 2009 14:08 | #30 just send it back in. Second attempt should fix it 5D|BG-E4N|40D|BG-E2|15mm|28mm|35L|17-40L|50L|85 1.2L II|100mm macro|135L |70-200mm 2.8L| 580EX| Cybersync's| 1 bad bag problem!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1258 guests, 181 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||