Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 14 Jun 2009 (Sunday) 22:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

85mm 1.8 just returned from Canon WTF!

 
SolidxSnake
Goldmember
Avatar
1,656 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2007
     
Jun 15, 2009 18:01 |  #31

I feel as if you must be running into MFD with that "real world" shot, that's a MUCH bigger backfocus than 2-4mm.


Troubleshooting 101 (see also: LightRules,perryge):
1) RTFM.
2) Repeat Step 1.

Gear ~ DeviantART (external link) ~ My Heatware (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JS300
Member
86 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Likes: 73
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Seoul, Korea
     
Jun 15, 2009 18:12 as a reply to  @ SolidxSnake's post |  #32

I would send it back too. I had an 85mm f/1.8 that severely backfocused. The first trip to Canon, it came back exactly the same. The second time was a charm. ;)


JS300
: gear :: 500px (external link) :: Instagram (external link) :: flickr (external link) :

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Jun 15, 2009 18:27 |  #33

The first shot may be a touch backfocused. I personally wouldn't send it back for that. The second shot's focus is off by a bit. Not sure if it's entirely due to the camera/lens or not though.

If there is consistent back focusing issue in real world use, I'd send it back.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stickman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,966 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jun 15, 2009 19:14 |  #34

Neilyb wrote in post #8111909 (external link)
Send it back. You know that it does not work, why ask this lot? Skewed or not you can see the problem.



Agreed, the OP obviously isn't happy with the lens in its current condition, and I doubt that people here are going to be able to talk him into being satisfied..... so get rid of it.


Stick
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/stickgunner/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
angryhampster
"Got a thick monopod?"
Avatar
3,860 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2006
Location: Iowa
     
Jun 15, 2009 19:41 |  #35

2mm is not enough to fret about. The second test is in front of MFD. User error/apprehensiveness​. This forum talks so much about poorly-calibrated lenses that people are forgetting how they actually work.


Steve Lexa
Iowa City Wedding Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yaamon
Goldmember
1,435 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Markham, Ontario
     
Jun 15, 2009 20:33 as a reply to  @ angryhampster's post |  #36

Send it with the body.

I would send the lens back with the body.

You can explain that you have several other lens that focuses properly with the body and don't want to mess that up.

Canon will then adjust the lens to focus on your body. It's that simple.

Hers is my 85mm @F1.8 on a 50D with 0 MA. The 85mm that I have needs 0 ma on the 5D II and 50D and also focuses dead center with a xsi body.

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3628/3631138340_3b238044c3_o.jpg

Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HoldDaMayo
Member
Avatar
140 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Jun 15, 2009 20:40 |  #37

Yaamon wrote in post #8116525 (external link)
I would send the lens back with the body.

You can explain that you have several other lens that focuses properly with the body and don't want to mess that up.

Canon will then adjust the lens to focus on your body. It's that simple.

Hers is my 85mm @F1.8 on a 50D with 0 MA. The 85mm that I have needs 0 ma on the 5D II and 50D and also focuses dead center with a xsi body.

Want to sell it? :cool:


Canon 40D, EF50mm F/1.8 II, Tamron 17-50mm F/2.8, Speedlite 430

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SolidxSnake
Goldmember
Avatar
1,656 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2007
     
Jun 15, 2009 21:08 |  #38

angryhampster wrote in post #8116276 (external link)
2mm is not enough to fret about. The second test is in front of MFD. User error/apprehensiveness​. This forum talks so much about poorly-calibrated lenses that people are forgetting how they actually work.

+1bw!


Troubleshooting 101 (see also: LightRules,perryge):
1) RTFM.
2) Repeat Step 1.

Gear ~ DeviantART (external link) ~ My Heatware (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yaamon
Goldmember
1,435 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Markham, Ontario
     
Jun 15, 2009 21:11 as a reply to  @ HoldDaMayo's post |  #39

Sell the 85mm and go crazy looking for another that focuses as accurate, my hair will grey even faster. ;)

See you have a tamron I also and mine focuses dead center too. :)

Im picky that I want my lens and body to focus exactly where I focused at, just one less thing to worry about when taking pictures.

Most people don't even realize that they may have a lens and body that front or back focus and think at wide open aperture it's normal for the lens to be soft.

Some may think 2mm to 4mm up close is nothing to worry about but as the distance increase so does the misfocus depth, it does not stay the same.


Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAlz1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere Great!
     
Jun 15, 2009 22:17 |  #40

User error WOW...... This thread has took on a whole new life of it's own. I just love how you ask for advise and get called stupid....
I am well aware of what MFD is and I was outside that range, you don't get focus confirmation, and can't take the shot in Auto Focus if your not!
Ok back to the point, yes it does back focus that bad, thanks for the real input from the people that have been there and done that. Thanks all except the ones thumping my forehead collecting post counts.

I will post back once I talk to Canon.

I am still amazed though at the people that think you shouldn't be able to focus on something wide open, like building a race car and telling the driver you can't shift into final gear. Hey thats good enough for you, it's NOT good enough for me.

HoldDaMayo, put your money where your mouth is, Ill sell to your right now for the same price I paid for it in march, thats $30.00 cheaper then current retail. I bought it new @ B&Hphoto I have receipt and warranty card, and all original box and papers.




Eos 7D, 40D w/70-200L 2.8 IS, 50mm 1.4, Nifty Fifty II, 100MM 2.8 Macro, 18-135mm IS , Sigma 30mm 1.4 , Sigma 18-35 1.8 ART 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAlz1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere Great!
     
Jun 15, 2009 22:36 |  #41

Yeah I would never want anything as small as a battery to be in focus anyway. Never an eyes ball or a watch, heck who needs 1.8? I'll stop it down to f8.0 and make pretend I got 1.8 ability.

JK, just taking a poke at the Idiocracy displayed in some of these posts :) ima calling Canon tomorrow. Thanks everyone this was interesting at best.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE



Eos 7D, 40D w/70-200L 2.8 IS, 50mm 1.4, Nifty Fifty II, 100MM 2.8 Macro, 18-135mm IS , Sigma 30mm 1.4 , Sigma 18-35 1.8 ART 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
w7cma
Senior Member
Avatar
459 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Missoula, Montana
     
Jun 15, 2009 22:46 as a reply to  @ BigAlz1's post |  #42

That is the test I usually perform, definitely back focus. I shot this today 100% crop of original with slight USM. Good luck with Canon, lets us know how it turns out.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


With the touch of a button, I can speak a thousand words.
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
iTookMyShot
Goldmember
Avatar
1,334 posts
Likes: 73
Joined Mar 2006
Location: So Cal, USA
     
Jun 15, 2009 22:53 |  #43

looks like you may be trying to focus too close... if your trying to focus too close, your camera sensor may be on the spot you want, but it will still show whats in focus at the correct distance


5D mkIV, 2x)7D mkII, 500 f4L IS mkII, 100-400L IS mkII, 70-200 2.8L IS mkII, 24-70 2.8L mkII, 16-35 2.8L mkIII, 100 2.8L IS, 600EX-RT x4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAlz1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere Great!
     
Jun 15, 2009 22:55 |  #44

Digitally_Altered.

I was well over 2 feet past MFD. That had been covered and noted and good thing for me my 40D, when lens is in Auto Focus, doesn't focus or fire of the shutter inside MFD. ;)
Thanks W7cma, that was my first "battery test". I only did it to be a smart A double s. I admit when I logged in tonight and read the replies I was ticked off. I am all good now though. Great shot BTW.




Eos 7D, 40D w/70-200L 2.8 IS, 50mm 1.4, Nifty Fifty II, 100MM 2.8 Macro, 18-135mm IS , Sigma 30mm 1.4 , Sigma 18-35 1.8 ART 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
iTookMyShot
Goldmember
Avatar
1,334 posts
Likes: 73
Joined Mar 2006
Location: So Cal, USA
     
Jun 15, 2009 23:03 |  #45

ok, guess i didnt see that in the post, as they all look as if anything closest to the camera is out of focus...


5D mkIV, 2x)7D mkII, 500 f4L IS mkII, 100-400L IS mkII, 70-200 2.8L IS mkII, 24-70 2.8L mkII, 16-35 2.8L mkIII, 100 2.8L IS, 600EX-RT x4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,118 views & 0 likes for this thread, 32 members have posted to it.
85mm 1.8 just returned from Canon WTF!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1258 guests, 181 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.