how long does your shutter need to be open in order to get good star trails? and what are good general aperature and iso settings for trying to get good star trails?
dave
Muskydave22 Goldmember 1,716 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Menomonee Falls, WI More info | Jun 15, 2009 21:32 | #1 |
MatthewHicksPhotography Goldmember 2,552 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada More info | Jun 15, 2009 22:20 | #2 Well, I'd say 10+ minutes, but that's just when they look awesome. Calgary Wedding Photography by Matthew Hicks: www.matthicksphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kevin Cream of the Crop 5,920 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2005 More info | Jun 15, 2009 23:11 | #3 When I do star trails I tend to expose anywhere from 120 seconds (2 minutes) to 240 seconds (4 minutes). As you increase exposure time you will increase the number of stars, brighter stars expose quicker than dimmer stars. If you increase exposure times much beyond 5 minutes you may start seeing hot pixels, which you can clone out providing there are not too many.You can take as many exposures as you like depending on the length of star arc you want, but you don't have to use them all if you change your mind on your composition. I usually shoot to achieve between 60 to 90 minutes of earths rotation. I use Russell Brown's Stack-a-Matic to stack my exposures either raw or TIFF. I usually PP all my file through ACR to adjust color temp and do all PP in ACR before saving as a TIFF. Stack-a-Matic loads from Bridge and loads the final stack into CS4.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Adrena1in Goldmember 1,703 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK. More info | Jun 16, 2009 06:50 | #4 Kevin wrote in post #8117296 As you increase exposure time you will increase the number of stars That's true up to a certain point, but because the stars are constantly moving, the really dim ones will never show up on the sensor no matter how long you expose for. Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TylerCP Member 62 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Winnipeg More info | Jun 16, 2009 08:04 | #5 Or if you want to do one long exposure, longer than an hour, its also cool. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sorarse Goldmember 2,193 posts Likes: 25 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Kent, UK More info | Jun 16, 2009 10:48 | #6 TylerCP wrote in post #8118812 Seeing as the stars are so far you can leave the shutter open for a long time as one star doesn't stay on one pixel for so long so it won't overexpose. That may possibly be, but if there is any light pollution in the sky, long single exposures will end up with a bright, strangely coloured sky, which doesn't look very realistic. At the beginning of time there was absolutely nothing. And then it exploded! Terry Pratchett
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TylerCP Member 62 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Winnipeg More info | Jun 17, 2009 06:46 | #7 Sorarse wrote in post #8119688 That may possibly be, but if there is any light pollution in the sky, long single exposures will end up with a bright, strangely coloured sky, which doesn't look very realistic. True, but if you are far enough away from any city/house/town and there is no other light sources then that rule applies. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2595 guests, 172 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||