Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Urban Life & Travel 
Thread started 15 Jun 2009 (Monday) 21:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

how to get good star trails?

 
Muskydave22
Goldmember
Avatar
1,716 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
     
Jun 15, 2009 21:32 |  #1

how long does your shutter need to be open in order to get good star trails? and what are good general aperature and iso settings for trying to get good star trails?

dave


Facebook (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Matthew ­ Hicks ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
2,552 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
     
Jun 15, 2009 22:20 |  #2

Well, I'd say 10+ minutes, but that's just when they look awesome.


Calgary Wedding Photography by Matthew Hicks: www.matthicksphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kevin
Cream of the Crop
5,920 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2005
     
Jun 15, 2009 23:11 |  #3

When I do star trails I tend to expose anywhere from 120 seconds (2 minutes) to 240 seconds (4 minutes). As you increase exposure time you will increase the number of stars, brighter stars expose quicker than dimmer stars. If you increase exposure times much beyond 5 minutes you may start seeing hot pixels, which you can clone out providing there are not too many.You can take as many exposures as you like depending on the length of star arc you want, but you don't have to use them all if you change your mind on your composition. I usually shoot to achieve between 60 to 90 minutes of earths rotation. I use Russell Brown's Stack-a-Matic to stack my exposures either raw or TIFF. I usually PP all my file through ACR to adjust color temp and do all PP in ACR before saving as a TIFF. Stack-a-Matic loads from Bridge and loads the final stack into CS4.

Here is the link to Stack-a-Matic tutorial, which just happens to be one of my images. Here is the Russell Brown main page http://av.adobe.com …own/NewStackAMa​tic_SM.mov (external link) and the Russell Brown Show http://www.russellbrow​n.com/tips_tech.html (external link). The tutorial is called "Combining Multiple Exposures with Dr. Brown's Stack-A-Matic" most of his scripts are free, including this one.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adrena1in
Goldmember
1,703 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK.
     
Jun 16, 2009 06:50 |  #4

Kevin wrote in post #8117296 (external link)
As you increase exposure time you will increase the number of stars

That's true up to a certain point, but because the stars are constantly moving, the really dim ones will never show up on the sensor no matter how long you expose for.

Personally I stick with 30s exposures, ISO 800 or 1600, aperture wide open or perhaps stopped down a couple, which is ample to capture lots of stars. (First of all I take one or two test exposures with various settings, to see which looks best, then stick with that setting.) I then put the camera into burst mode, turn off mirror-lockup, lock the remote shutter down and go indoors for half an hour or an hour.

Once I'm done, I use Startrails software to combine all the images, or I load them into Adobe Premier Elements and make a timelapse movie.


Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TylerCP
Member
Avatar
62 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Winnipeg
     
Jun 16, 2009 08:04 |  #5

Or if you want to do one long exposure, longer than an hour, its also cool.
ISO 400 with F/5.6 or 8 works great.

Seeing as the stars are so far you can leave the shutter open for a long time as one star doesn't stay on one pixel for so long so it won't overexpose.


Gear List
Portfolio (external link)
Arenas with that one red light bother my white balance.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sorarse
Goldmember
Avatar
2,193 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Kent, UK
     
Jun 16, 2009 10:48 |  #6

TylerCP wrote in post #8118812 (external link)
Seeing as the stars are so far you can leave the shutter open for a long time as one star doesn't stay on one pixel for so long so it won't overexpose.

That may possibly be, but if there is any light pollution in the sky, long single exposures will end up with a bright, strangely coloured sky, which doesn't look very realistic.


At the beginning of time there was absolutely nothing. And then it exploded! Terry Pratchett

http://www.scarecrowim​ages.com (external link)
Canon PowerShot G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TylerCP
Member
Avatar
62 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Winnipeg
     
Jun 17, 2009 06:46 |  #7

Sorarse wrote in post #8119688 (external link)
That may possibly be, but if there is any light pollution in the sky, long single exposures will end up with a bright, strangely coloured sky, which doesn't look very realistic.

True, but if you are far enough away from any city/house/town and there is no other light sources then that rule applies.


Gear List
Portfolio (external link)
Arenas with that one red light bother my white balance.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,112 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
how to get good star trails?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Urban Life & Travel 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2595 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.