TMR Design wrote in post #8135632
I know that the Avenger A5017 has 2 aluminum risers as opposed to an A420 with the first riser made of steel and I see a slightly larger footprint on the A420 but the maximum loads are almost equal and I'm wondering if the A5017 used in a non-boom application is a good stand.
Anyone have experience with this light stand? Any negatives? It looks like a very good general purpose stand and has a leveling leg.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com …er_Stand_17.html#features
A5017 is the new designation of the A660, Robert. I have an A660 and also an A420. The 660 is a fantastic stand and I'd certainly give it two thumbs up. The footprint is, as you've noted, smaller than that of the A420 but the stand is very stable for the non-boom applications you mentioned. It will hold my largest softbox (36"x46") very comfortably. For boom use (D600 in my case) it's always the A420 but for all other applications, the A660 is the weapon of choice. The lazy leg arrangement is a bit unusual: The unfolded legs are normally parallel to the ground. One leg has an elongated bolt head with two holes in it near the central column. The bolt is apparently cammed because as the bolt head is turned (which is accomplished by sticking something through one of the holes for leverage) the angle of the leg changes. The maximum possible angle change seems rather minimal before the leg starts returning to its "rest" position. My stand lives on flat floors so I have no opinion how this lazy leg implementation would work in the field. With the legs folded, the stand is quite compact but you do wind up with the casters sticking out at 90-degrees to the central column. One other point: the fact that the legs lie parallel to the ground makes them extremely sandbag friendly which is appreciated considering the stand's footprint. All things considered, the A660/A5017 is a wonderfully strong, unobtrusive, and flexible stand. Highly recommended.
Dave F.