Two more
Xcelx Senior Member 558 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info |
jpang Member 175 posts Likes: 76 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Melbourne More info | Both at 10mm: IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/j_pang/5220194927/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RuthlessSAT Member 116 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: NYC More info | 5DMKIII • 17-40L • 100L • 70-200LII •50 1.4 • 24-70VC Tam • Σ 35 1.4 Art | RRS TVC-33 BH55 TA3L | POTN Feedback |Cedric Melbourne Photography Facebook Fan Page
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Love my sigma _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jpang Member 175 posts Likes: 76 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Melbourne More info | Shot with my 10-20/3.5 at 13mm and 14mm. Any wider, and you can see the Cokin filter holder that I was using: IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …_pang/5397213040/lightbox
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sinjans Senior Member 659 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Newfoundland and Labrador More info | Jan 31, 2011 06:20 | #21 YES!!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shimian Hatchling 3 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info |
KimbrEsque Member 40 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: St Regis Falls NY More info | Feb 06, 2011 14:01 | #23 this seems so nice! does anyone think this would be nice for newborn/maternity shots as well as portraits and things? it seems like it works for a lot of different styles?? also the above pic makes me want this lens because i do bands as well. facebook.com/kimbre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KimbrEsque Member 40 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: St Regis Falls NY More info | Feb 06, 2011 14:04 | #24 |
Feb 06, 2011 16:15 | #25 KimbrEsque wrote in post #11788920 this seems so nice! does anyone think this would be nice for newborn/maternity shots as well as portraits and things? it seems like it works for a lot of different styles?? also the above pic makes me want this lens because i do bands as well. IMO, no this would be a poor choice, especially for maternity/newborns. The distortion will be very unflattering. In the pic above, look at the legs of the gentleman on the left and right. Notice the distortion? And the closer you get to the subject, more pronounced it will be. R6 | R7 | 15-85is | Rokinon 14 2.8 | RF 16 2.8 | 16-35 F4is L | RF 24-105 F4is L | RF 70-200 F4is L | 100-400 II L | Σ150-600 C | 1.4X III | 2X III | 430ex |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KimbrEsque Member 40 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: St Regis Falls NY More info | Feb 06, 2011 19:24 | #26 okay. yeah i thought about that after I saw it, i do want this lens also though! facebook.com/kimbre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jpang Member 175 posts Likes: 76 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Melbourne More info | No photos since January? It looks like there's not too many people that have this lens or are shooting with one. IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/j_pang/5584669303/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Geoff_Shawcross "Nuttier than a squirrel terd" 5,127 posts Likes: 13 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Airdrie, Alberta, Canada More info | Apr 04, 2011 01:37 | #28 I'm trying to deside whether to get this version or the original one. That's my delema. Geoff | SmugMug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jpang Member 175 posts Likes: 76 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Melbourne More info |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1077 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||