Shot at noon on a bright day. (oops see pics below) 
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Jun 23, 2009 16:00 | #1 Shot at noon on a bright day. (oops see pics below)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 23, 2009 16:03 | #2 Wow now that's bright! Be sure to check your histogram for blown highlights. 1DX, ID MKIII, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L, 16-35 2.8L, 100 macro, 600EX-RTs, ST-E3-RT, Einsteins, Kacey Beauty Dish with a cracked grid, yada yada
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 23, 2009 16:04 | #3 Shot around noon on a bright day.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 23, 2009 16:05 | #4 StanNJ1 wrote in post #8161232  Wow now that's bright! Be sure to check your histogram for blown highlights.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
The second picture is awesome! Name: Theron
LOG IN TO REPLY |
david.p.livingston Member 227 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Iowa City, Ia More info | Pull back the processing a bit, they are too photochopped for my taste. Nice shots though. davidlivingstonphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MichaelBottoms Cream of the Crop 6,297 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Whitby Ontario... just outside of Toronto More info | Jun 24, 2009 14:19 | #7 StanNJ1 wrote in post #8161232 Wow now that's bright! Be sure to check your histogram for blown highlights. david.p.livingston wrote in post #8162202 Pull back the processing a bit, they are too photochopped for my taste. Nice shots though. I really like the second image, but I agree with the two comments above. Highlights are just a little too blown and the processing may be a bit too strong. Still a very nice image though. Former Pentax & 20D owner... now the pleased owner of the new 50D, 580EX, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, Canon EF-S 60mm Macro, Canon EFS 17-85mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Kenko 1.4X Teleplus Pro 300, Sekonic L-508 Zoom Master Meter, Manfrotto and slik tripods, trekpod and other assorted accessories...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bbvdm Goldmember  1,081 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Kenmore, NY More info | Jun 24, 2009 16:00 | #8 StanNJ1 wrote in post #8161232 Wow now that's bright! Be sure to check your histogram for blown highlights. Did I miss something or was the picture changed. I do not see blown highlights???? Canon 5D MkII gripped, Canon 7D gripped, Canon 40D gripped, Canon XTI (IR) gripped, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 60 Macro 2.8, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS , Canon 24-105 4.0, Tokina 11-16 2.8, Canon 50mm 1.8, Sekonic L-358, Canon Speedlite 580-EX II, (2)430-EX, Pocket Wizards, lots of other stuff that seems to keep growing...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 24, 2009 16:03 | #9 Ya I would also pull back on the photoshop. Specifically the saturation levels.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
markblanchard13 Senior Member  534 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: The Shire More info | Jun 24, 2009 16:14 | #10 Over saturated a bit...but I still like them a lot. markBLANCHARD Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 24, 2009 21:10 | #11 bbvdm wrote in post #8167987 Did I miss something or was the picture changed. I do not see blown highlights???? I neglected to actually attach the photos to the first post. Stan was joking that the white page was blown highlights
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 24, 2009 21:18 | #12 The second shot was intentionally oversaturated because it was going to be used in a small space on a crowded web page. The idea was to create something vibrant that would stand out. Here is the edited image without the photoshop action that amped it up.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 24, 2009 21:25 | #13 markblanchard13 wrote in post #8168055 #1 crop a little lower to show off them sexy legs!, nice exposure so as to not blow out the white dress. Something like this?  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
phamster Cream of the Crop  6,315 posts Likes: 51 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Purdue - Go Boilers More info | Jun 24, 2009 22:20 | #14 gonzogolf wrote in post #8169656 The second shot was intentionally oversaturated because it was going to be used in a small space on a crowded web page. The idea was to create something vibrant that would stand out. Here is the edited image without the photoshop action that amped it up. i like this photo , the crop, the PP and the lighting.. spot on "Lighting will make or break your photo"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 24, 2009 22:21 | #15 phamster wrote in post #8170059 i like this photo , the crop, the PP and the lighting.. spot on phamster Thanks Phamster. I'm learning from watching you
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1044 guests, 108 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
