This is my first picture i have taken of my son Kai. Its was the first time i had used a DSLR. Just wondering what you guys think.
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
W.E.S.P "Terror Byte" 66 posts Joined Jun 2009 More info | Jun 27, 2009 15:24 | #1 This is my first picture i have taken of my son Kai. Its was the first time i had used a DSLR. Just wondering what you guys think.
canon 40D / canon 17-85mm IS USM / sigma 105mm Macro / Sigma 70-300mm APO DG
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay Cream of the Crop 7,546 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA More info | Jun 27, 2009 20:36 | #2 It seems to be lacking contrast. Take a look at the histogram, and you will see that all of the tones are in the range 30 to 160, which is extremely limited. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigAlz1 Goldmember 1,475 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Somewhere Great! More info | Jun 27, 2009 20:51 | #3 Good shot, great DOF, I think. Makes you focus right to his face. Is it just me or is there just a small hint of blue left in his right eye? Did you convert to B&W or just de-sat?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 28, 2009 00:20 | #4 BigAlz1 wrote in post #8186449 Good shot, great DOF, I think. Makes you focus right to his face. Is it just me or is there just a small hint of blue left in his right eye? Did you convert to B&W or just de-sat? Make the Contrast pop and I would leave it all de-sat but his eyes. That would be a kewl shot.
canon 40D / canon 17-85mm IS USM / sigma 105mm Macro / Sigma 70-300mm APO DG
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 28, 2009 00:45 | #5 Robert_Lay wrote in post #8186389 It seems to be lacking contrast. Take a look at the histogram, and you will see that all of the tones are in the range 30 to 160, which is extremely limited. If you edit your profile so as to allow us edit and re-post your image, someone can illustrate an increase in contrast. The next thing that you will have to deal with is the lighting. Frontal flash is horrible unless it is carefully controlled. In this case the flash should be off camera and diffused if you are to have any chance at decent lighting. My flash is built in to the camera until i can afford to buy an external one.
canon 40D / canon 17-85mm IS USM / sigma 105mm Macro / Sigma 70-300mm APO DG
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigAlz1 Goldmember 1,475 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Somewhere Great! More info | Jun 28, 2009 01:21 | #6 Here is what he was talking about, I did what I could with such a small image.
I opened it in ACR, increased the CONTRAST a bit then opened it into Photoshop. Next added a levels adjustment layer and moved things a bit to the dark side since that is where your photos was suffering. I quick masked the eyes, bumped up the sat on them and added a catch light. Not perfect but it was simple and all I could do with that file. You can get into some real complicated stuff with B&W. You can increase or decrease the RBG channels to get totally different skin tones and contrasts. Good luck and have fun. *edit, top is before and bottom is after just in case you wondered why there was two.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 28, 2009 01:42 | #7 BigAlz1 wrote in post #8187541 Here is what he was talking about, I did what I could with such a small image.
I opened it in ACR, increased the CONTRAST a bit then opened it into Photoshop. Next added a levels adjustment layer and moved things a bit to the dark side since that is where your photos was suffering. I quick masked the eyes, bumped up the sat on them and added a catch light. Not perfect but it was simple and all I could do with that file. You can get into some real complicated stuff with B&W. You can increase or decrease the RBG channels to get totally different skin tones and contrasts. Good luck and have fun. *edit, top is before and bottom is after just in case you wondered why there was two. Thanks for your edit. I redone it again to your settings, but toned the eyes down some what. canon 40D / canon 17-85mm IS USM / sigma 105mm Macro / Sigma 70-300mm APO DG
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigAlz1 Goldmember 1,475 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Somewhere Great! More info | Jun 28, 2009 01:52 | #8 No image there bud
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Weird, it was in the script. canon 40D / canon 17-85mm IS USM / sigma 105mm Macro / Sigma 70-300mm APO DG
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeFairbanks Cream of the Crop 6,428 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2009 More info | Jun 28, 2009 06:24 | #10 I like the first one better. The "fixed up" one looks demonic (imo). Thank you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay Cream of the Crop 7,546 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA More info | Jun 28, 2009 08:00 | #11 Here is my fix for the first image that you posted. All I did was increase the contrast in PSE7 Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay Cream of the Crop 7,546 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA More info | Jun 28, 2009 08:09 | #12 W.E.S.P wrote in post #8187436 My flash is built in to the camera until i can afford to buy an external one. I can lower the exposure of the cameras flash if that would help? If thats what it is? If you don't mind critiquing this as well ... It would be inappropriate for me to make a simple statement giving a procedure that would improve the picture. It is better when you learn to do that yourself by figuring out what is wrong with a picture and what needs to be done to fix it. What works for one does not necessarily work for another. There are too many different ways to improve a picture having low contrast. No one way is correct - thousands of ways will work. You may want to read my article on the Quality of Light as found in my signature. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1105 guests, 174 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||