27/06/09 Wedding - C&C needed

Hi guys. Just require a bit of feedback before I finish processing. Some new processing styles and equipment.

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

While I'm not the greatest at critiquing wedding pics, as I've only ever done one weeding and it will likely be my last lol. However, to me these pics look rather washed out, like old colour/light-faded film shots. Now, if this is the technique you were going for then you hit it, but if it's not then I think you need to re-check the exposure on the post-processing. Btw, this is just a critique of the technique in the post-processing, the shots themselves are quite good for cropping/framing, etc

CDBlue wrote in post #8188408
While I'm not the greatest at critiquing wedding pics, as I've only ever done one weeding and it will likely be my last lol. However, to me these pics look rather washed out, like old colour/light-faded film shots. Now, if this is the technique you were going for then you hit it, but if it's not then I think you need to re-check the exposure on the post-processing. Btw, this is just a critique of the technique in the post-processing, the shots themselves are quite good for cropping/framing, etc

Yes; 100% intended look. It's a mix between retro/film/sepia.

I think it provides a classic look and is great for hiding my poor lighting and white balance from the receptions tungsten bulbs.

Then you hit it Kind of reminds me of light-faded Polaroids from the 70's