Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 29 Jun 2009 (Monday) 10:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help me understand why my photos aren't wyswyg

 
Kuma
Senior Member
Avatar
996 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: The Igloo spirit remains
     
Jun 29, 2009 10:15 |  #1

I've done many searches here and on the net. I've gotten some good advice but I'm still struggling. Photos I'm printing aren't what I am seeing on the screen. Even the exif seems to agree that my printer just wants to print dark. I turned my LCD monitor brightness down nearly 50%. I'm closer but these compromises seem extreme.

As a test I posted some shots to the forums to see if they too were coming out dark. To my surprise they were just as the image appear on my screen. Am I missing something important here?

Here is an example shot. I'd appreciate any advice.

IMAGE: http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s90/kumas_photo_album/Phipps-1.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jun 29, 2009 10:26 |  #2

Is this an example of something that looks good on your monitor but prints too dark?

If so, maybe you are not managing your print correctly. The image looks fine to me -- the highlights are quite bright and the shadows aren't overly dark. And, yes, many monitors are significantly too bright coming out of the factory to do proper photo editing.

So, questions:

Is your monitor calibrated?

What software are you using to view/edit/print? You will get the best results from color-managed software -- Adobe products and, with the right settings DPP as well.

If you are using color managed software do you specify that 1) your software should manage the print color and 2) your driver should not (a setting in the print driver itself)?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Jun 29, 2009 14:30 |  #3

WYSIWYG has yet to reach the photography world I'm afraid. Monitor and printer/paper profiling (two distinctly seperate things) followed by soft proofing are neccesary to get an accurate print.

A 50% reduction in monitor brightness is not at all unusual. Good monitor calibration hardware/software is available that will step you carefully through the process. It is recommended that it be redone regularly, I do mine once a month.

Printer/paper profiles are normally available in the printer driver or from paper manufacturers web-sites as downloads. If using commercial printers, then they should offer their own profiles.

After all that, as Tony says it's important to allow Photoshop (or whatever else you use) to manage the printing and not to let the printer driver do it.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jun 29, 2009 15:15 |  #4

Also: be sure to view the prints in good lighting.

In the link from my sig (Color problems?) there are a few links about softproofing and color managed printing.

It all starts with a well calibrated monitor at the proper brightness. Recommended about 120Cd/m^2 max. A lot of monitors are over 300 Cd/m^2 out of the box...
Some need to have their backlight dialed all the way down, so the 50% figure is not that extreme.

Your image doesn't look overly dark to me.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kuma
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
996 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: The Igloo spirit remains
     
Jun 29, 2009 15:21 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #5

Thanks Tony and Richard for trying to help me. :D

Yes this photo is an example of something that looks good on my monitor but comes out darker on my printer.

No my monitor isn't calibrated. I just played around with setting my monitor brightness settings much lower to see how my prints turned out. After turning down the brightness 50% I processed my image to look good. I did a test print and its darker than what it looked like on my monitor. If you were to look at the prints the first thing you might say is "ok image but looks dark to me".

I'm used to using CS2 but lately I've been trying to get into Lightroom. Lightroom seems to be where I struggle with dark prints.

I've been setting Lightroom up to do the color management and turning off color management in my printer. I've downloaded the latest profiles from Epson for my printer. Did I miss something?

Thanks again :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kuma
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
996 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: The Igloo spirit remains
     
Jun 29, 2009 15:33 |  #6

René Damkot wrote in post #8195759 (external link)
Also: be sure to view the prints in good lighting.

In the link from my sig (Color problems?) there are a few links about softproofing and color managed printing.

It all starts with a well calibrated monitor at the proper brightness. Recommended about 120Cd/m^2 max. A lot of monitors are over 300 Cd/m^2 out of the box...
Some need to have their backlight dialed all the way down, so the 50% figure is not that extreme.

Your image doesn't look overly dark to me.

Thanks Rene,

The image above looks ok but when I send that same photo to my printer it comes out darker. I must be doing something wrong.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,453 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4542
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jun 29, 2009 15:42 |  #7

Go to DPReview.com and look up any of the dSLR test reports. At the beginning of page 1 of each test is a step wedge grayscale, which should be adjusted to be visible on your monitor for the widest number of steps to be discernable. You could print that same wedge on your printer, to see how it renders, too.

BTW the posted image looked fine on my monitor, too. Have you tried sending a file out for printing, to see how it comes out there?


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jun 29, 2009 15:47 |  #8

It sounds like your issue is the printing. Are you letting Photoshop manage printing? Or is the printer managing the printing?


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Jun 29, 2009 16:22 as a reply to  @ Tony-S's post |  #9

Printer profiles are a problem with me. Both the Hahnemuhle papers I use print very nicely using the profiles downloaded from their website for my Epson R2880. But Epsons own Premium Glossy paper is hopeless using Epsons very own profile. To overcome the problem I was forced to have a custom profile made.

They are not expensive and it certainly solved the issue for me. I would argue (and did at the time) that Epson have failed in not producing an accurate profile for their own paper and printer, but Epson refused to budge and I needed a printer that would produce gloss prints. They were coming out slightly colour shifted and a touch dark.

This is the second Epson printer I've needed to do this with.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jun 29, 2009 16:31 |  #10

Kuma wrote in post #8195787 (external link)
No my monitor isn't calibrated.

That *might* be part of the problem, however

Kuma wrote in post #8195787 (external link)
I'm used to using CS2 but lately I've been trying to get into Lightroom. Lightroom seems to be where I struggle with dark prints.

Meaning that CS2 prints fine with the same settings? If so:
Have a read here (external link)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kuma
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
996 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: The Igloo spirit remains
     
Jun 29, 2009 17:40 |  #11

René Damkot wrote in post #8196145 (external link)
That *might* be part of the problem, however


Meaning that CS2 prints fine with the same settings? If so:
Have a read here (external link)

Thanks everybody for giving me help. Its great to be able to come to the forums and have so many people lend me a hand.

Rene your awesome!! The last link you gave me fixed my problem completely. I set my profile for Premium glossy Best Photo in LR then pressed print. I went into the printer software and set the input and printer profiles to the same profile. When I ran a test print it came out exactly like the image I'm seeing in LR. No more darkness. Thanks very much :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jun 29, 2009 18:17 |  #12

Wouldn't it be lovely if software companies, printer manufacturers and OS developers would get together and get their act together. :rolleyes:

Glad it worked :)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,453 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4542
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jun 29, 2009 18:22 |  #13

René Damkot wrote in post #8196708 (external link)
Wouldn't it be lovely if software companies, printer manufacturers and OS developers would get together and get their act together. :rolleyes:

Glad it worked :)

Some degree of standardization?! Never happen :( because software is involved.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1555
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Jun 29, 2009 20:16 |  #14

Just a tip - now that you have the printer settings set up properly, save them as a preset so you don't forget to twiddle that one drop down menu or setting the next time!

Good to hear you got it cleared up.

Kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,620 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Help me understand why my photos aren't wyswyg
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1063 guests, 158 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.