pictures like that make me really sad 
I'm nowhere near that level...
jcwillia1 Member  136 posts Joined Jun 2012 More info | Jun 13, 2012 16:47 | #6826 pictures like that make me really sad Newbie || Rebel XS || EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
greenjeans Goldmember  More info | Jun 13, 2012 17:40 | #6827 Recently got a 70-200 F4 IS and the shots are better on the XS than the T3i. 6D, 6DII, 70D, 80D, R10, RP, Lumix DC-FZ80 and a bag full of lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 13, 2012 17:50 | #6828 Fangita wrote in post #14574313  ^^ Nice! How are you finding the 70-200 f4 on the 1000D Jan? Thanks John. It's a must have lens if your looking to upgrade from the 55-250 IS or 75-300. The quality is second to none and you can really tell when comparing to old shots taken with the 55-250. It performs much better on a EOS 40D or 7D body but on the Rebel it still works great. It is rapid, silent and sharp. My Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jcwillia1 Member 136 posts Joined Jun 2012 More info | Jun 14, 2012 05:37 | #6829 Hi. I'm new. I recently converted from an 18x super zoom point and shoot so I'm adjusting to life without the incredible reach of my trusty Lumix. Newbie || Rebel XS || EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnPh I smell like a Shoulder Shrugging Seal  2,489 posts Gallery: 196 photos Best ofs: 3 Likes: 1989 Joined Oct 2011 Location: Deepst darkest Cornwall More info | I don't think the 70-300 is very well regarded. Have a look at the 55-250 IS ՕFlickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jcwillia1 Member 136 posts Joined Jun 2012 More info | Jun 14, 2012 06:45 | #6831 Fangita wrote in post #14577290 I don't think the 70-300 is very well regarded. Have a look at the 55-250 IS http://www.amazon.com …/B0056E49MK/ref=pd_cp_p_0 That's a great starter lens, sharp and has IS, coupled with the 18-55mm IS II makes a nice kit. Ok awesome. Thanks. Newbie || Rebel XS || EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 14, 2012 06:58 | #6832 Fangita wrote in post #14577290 I don't think the 70-300 is very well regarded. Have a look at the 55-250 IS http://www.amazon.com …/B0056E49MK/ref=pd_cp_p_0 That's a great starter lens, sharp and has IS, coupled with the 18-55mm IS II makes a nice kit. Yes the 55-250 IS is a fantastic lens for the price. The 75-300 is one of the most rubbish Canon lenses ever made. My Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BKoo Member 130 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: New Jersey More info | Jun 14, 2012 09:46 | #6833 jcwillia1 wrote in post #14577192 Hi. I'm new. I recently converted from an 18x super zoom point and shoot so I'm adjusting to life without the incredible reach of my trusty Lumix. I started looking at lenses, just for reference, not ready to buy and I came across this one... http://www.amazon.com …oto-Cameras/dp/B00004THD0 Question - is the lack of image stabilization in this lens going to cause me problems? Do I need to save up for the more expensive lenses that have it? My main use would be outdoor daylight photography for this so it's just walk point and shoot that I am thinking about. My XS came bundled with the 75-300. I think it's decent for beginners but you'll need a tripod. I use mine for sports alot. IS would be nice though. There's a lens example forum. Canon Rebel XS - 18-55mm IS - 75-300mm - 50mm f/1.8II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 14, 2012 17:33 | #6834  Lufthansa Cargo | McDonnell Douglas MD-11F | D-ALCP | EDDF by Jan Jasinski, on Flickr Qatar Airways | Airbus A330-202 | A7-ACI | EDDF by Jan Jasinski, on Flickr Condor (Thomas Cook) | Boeing 767-330/ER | D-ABUB | EDDF by Jan Jasinski, on FlickrMy Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
greenjeans Goldmember More info |  IMG_9902 by greenjeans1, on FlickrXS with Canon 70-200 F4 IS 6D, 6DII, 70D, 80D, R10, RP, Lumix DC-FZ80 and a bag full of lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 16, 2012 02:27 | #6836  IMG_6251.jpg by Florin Beudean, on Flickr
IMG_6279.jpg by Florin Beudean, on Flickr
IMG_6255.jpg by Florin Beudean, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jakeols Hatchling 3 posts Joined Jun 2012 More info | Jun 16, 2012 20:20 | #6837 im debating selling my t2i, 2 lenses, and battery grip to buy the xs with the 17-40mm f/4L lens. do you think its worth it? and does the xs have decent autofocus? Thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 16, 2012 21:10 | #6838 jakeols wrote in post #14589109 im debating selling my t2i, 2 lenses, and battery grip to buy the xs with the 17-40mm f/4L lens. do you think its worth it? and does the xs have decent autofocus? Thanks! It's a pretty big downgrade. My Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CHIcubs0703 Member 58 posts Joined Mar 2012 Location: Elgin, IL More info | Matt | Gear: 6D, Rokinon 14 f/2.8, 24-105mm f/4 L, 40mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8, 400mm f/5.6 L Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrainMechanic Goldmember  3,526 posts Likes: 18 Joined Apr 2010 More info | Jun 19, 2012 18:10 | #6840  Permanent banjakeols wrote in post #14589109 im debating selling my t2i, 2 lenses, and battery grip to buy the xs with the 17-40mm f/4L lens. do you think its worth it? and does the xs have decent autofocus? Thanks! That makes absolutely no sense at all... Gear: a toothed wheel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 857 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
