Here's a shot of the flowers on our back fence. I tried to create a painterly effect and IMHO, I pulled it off. What's the verdict?
 | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
Hinson Goldmember  More info | Jul 08, 2009 16:46 | #1 Here's a shot of the flowers on our back fence. I tried to create a painterly effect and IMHO, I pulled it off. What's the verdict?
Artist tools: Lumix FZ1000 (Canon 60D, 28/2.8, 10-22mm, Tamron 28-300mm VC ALL NOW FOR SALE - REASONABLE OFFER)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
reddyroc007 Senior Member  809 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Iqaluit, NU More info | Jul 08, 2009 16:46 | #2 no image chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 08, 2009 18:09 | #3 reddyroc007 wrote in post #8247276  no image Mmmm, I can see it. Can anyone else? Artist tools: Lumix FZ1000 (Canon 60D, 28/2.8, 10-22mm, Tamron 28-300mm VC ALL NOW FOR SALE - REASONABLE OFFER)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Brypan Member  142 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Boca Raton, FL More info | I can see it. I like the painty-type feeling; the tree in the backrond really pulls the feeling off for me. On the oter hand, I have a thing against cyber-frames. Maybe just a black frame? Unless you like that it adds to the painty feel. I think that if printed, you could put it into a real frame and it would look fantastic. Canon EOS Rebel XS|EF-s 18-55mm IS|EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 |||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 08, 2009 22:46 | #5 I think you pulled it off too!! Wonderful image!! The "cyber frame" is a little over the top for me though. EOS 450D & T7i |18-55mm EFS IS | Sigma 50-500mm "Bigma" | Sigma 150mm 2.8 "Bugma" | Venus Optics 100mm Macro 2X and KX-800 Twin Flash| DIY Flash Diffuser | 2019 iMac 27" | & some other things..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 08, 2009 23:29 | #6 Thanks for the comments. The frame was a filter I was playing with. The flowers are the important part. And I agree Brypan, that printing it with that frame would ruin it. The frame was strictly for digital presentation. Artist tools: Lumix FZ1000 (Canon 60D, 28/2.8, 10-22mm, Tamron 28-300mm VC ALL NOW FOR SALE - REASONABLE OFFER)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PictureNorthCarolina Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops! 9,318 posts Likes: 248 Joined Apr 2006 Location: North Carolina More info | Jul 09, 2009 06:55 | #7 Agree. I think it works very well because you decided on a soft, pleasant effect (as opposed to bright / contrasty). Very nice, indeed. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cyclop Cream of the Crop 6,899 posts Joined Jun 2007 More info | Jul 11, 2009 08:40 | #8 Nice composition! Canon 50D w/grip, Canon 7D, Mark II w/grip, Tokina UWA 11-16 2.8, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 L IS, Canon 300 4 L IS, Canon 400 5.6 L, Canon 100 "macro" 2.8, Canon 60 "macro" 2.8, Canon Extender 1.4xII, Gitzo 3531S tripod w/Markins M20 ballhead, Gitzo GT2531EX tripod, Bogen-Manfrotto 681B monopod w/3232 head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1147 guests, 161 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
