both used and in great shape
a 80-200 2.8 "magic drainpipe" or 70-200 2.8(non-IS)
J-dubya Member 118 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Snook, TX(work in Iraq) More info | Jul 09, 2009 08:13 | #1 both used and in great shape
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard"  More info | Jul 09, 2009 08:18 | #2 I would always go for a ring-USM lens over the alternatives if given a choice. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Markitos Goldmember  1,615 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Durham, NC More info | Jul 09, 2009 08:19 | #3 I would always choose the lens that can be serviced vs. the one that can't. |Fuji X-E2|Fuji X-E1|Fuji 18 f/2|Fuji 35 f/1.4|Fuji 60 f/2.4 macro|Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4|Fuji 55-200 f/3.5-4.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gasrocks Cream of the Crop  13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | Jul 09, 2009 08:33 | #4 |
sugarzebra Cream of the Crop  More info | Jul 09, 2009 08:35 | #5 While they are both good optically, I would opt for the 70-200 because of the USM, it takes teleconverters and has full time manual focusing. Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1696 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
