Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 10 Jul 2009 (Friday) 18:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

E-Sessions and Long Range lenses

 
yap'in
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: T.Dot what!
     
Jul 10, 2009 18:21 |  #1

i shot my first engagement session ... and i confess, it was hard ... i did some concept drawings before to give me an idea what to do... but i know i'm not going to be too happy with my products ...

my question as you can see in the title, how beneficial would it be to have ... say, a 70-200 lens on you for a shoot like this?


Sean Yap
IT'S NOT A PURSE, IT'S A SATCHEL. INDIANA JONES WEARS ONE
My Flickr  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Jul 10, 2009 19:30 |  #2

Engagement is great with short and long lenses, but longer causes extra framing and communication challenges. I like fast lenses and sometimes an ultrawide for engagements; I wouldn't have any desire to bring my 70-200. I only use that for church and outdoor ceremonies with long distances available to shoot from.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yap'in
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: T.Dot what!
     
Jul 10, 2009 20:09 |  #3

Ahh thanks for the tip


Sean Yap
IT'S NOT A PURSE, IT'S A SATCHEL. INDIANA JONES WEARS ONE
My Flickr  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mrsjperry
Member
Avatar
164 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
     
Jul 11, 2009 00:01 |  #4

To each his own...I'm addicted to my 70-200. I like the Elvis approach....lil less conversation a lil more action. Let the couple do what's natural for them, with a dash of guidance.


If you know your passion then you've found your purpose.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Jul 12, 2009 12:07 |  #5

I've done E-sessions where I've brought all my lenses with me but ended up leaving the 70-200 on my 5D the entire time. I find that couples relax a little more (if that's the look you're going for) when I'm farther away.


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billo78
Senior Member
Avatar
351 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Adelaide - South Australia
     
Jul 13, 2009 10:01 |  #6

70-200 is more flattering than using a wide angle, I don't use my 70-200 nearly enough, I'm always blown away with the results. I also agree the couple get more relaxed when there's not a camera up in their faces.


Photography Blog (external link)
Adelaide Based Wedding Photographer (external link)

Gear: 5D2, 40D, 580 EX II, 430 EX II, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 18-200 OS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
superstes
Goldmember
Avatar
1,376 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern France
     
Jul 14, 2009 14:14 |  #7

yapin wrote in post #8259403 (external link)
=yap'in;8259403]

my question as you can see in the title, how beneficial would it be to have ... say, a 70-200 lens on you for a shoot like this?

For me personally, it's an essential piece of kit as the 24-70 is, love the fact that I don't need to be in their faces and the IQ quality is very nice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Svetlana
Goldmember
Avatar
3,357 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Jul 14, 2009 14:41 |  #8

I have shot an engagement with my 70-200 in 99% of the shots, 1% came from 17-55...I love the results from 70-200, I asked the couple to hold hands, sit in the grass, talk, kiss, hig, etc and was basically going along them taking photos...They don't feel like I'm in their space and act natural...just my 0.02 :)


Canon 7D, 5Dmk2, 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS, Canon 50 1.2L, 35 1.4L, 85 1.8, Canon 16-35L, Canon 100 2.8L IS Macro, Speedlight 580EX II x 2, 430 EX, enthusiasm.:D http://svetlanayanova.​com/ (external link)

Join me on Facebook (external link)! :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shimmishim
Goldmember
1,602 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
     
Jul 14, 2009 23:44 |  #9

Agreed. i added the 70-200 to my engagement shoot arsenal and it's been wonderful. I typically favor the 70-200 or the 85. Both are necessary for me.


Call me John | JSP Blog (external link) | flickr (external link) |facebook (external link) | twitter (external link)
Canon 5D Mark III + a few L lenses
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=654812

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixelharmony
Senior Member
Avatar
857 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
     
Jul 15, 2009 13:41 |  #10

Depends on your approach. I am set to buy a 70-200mm as my next lens. I kind of take my approach to engagements as shooting them in their natural state, I want to catch the way they interact and have a good time.

I also mix in posed shots and a lot of prime work for the shallow DoF, that's when you get to work with them and guage how they'd be photographed at their wedding.


Eugene Kim
5D Mark II . Sigma 50mm f1.4
R.I.P - D700, D300, D200, 40D, D50

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saxi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,781 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: NH, USA
     
Jul 15, 2009 13:52 |  #11

I absolutely love my 70-200, best lens I own. But indoors... ouch it is difficult, at least on a 1.6x crop.


5D III, 24-105mm f/4 L, 135mm f/2 L, 70-200mm f/4 IS L, 580EX II
Full Gear List
Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,487 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
E-Sessions and Long Range lenses
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1421 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.