Part 2. 5d MarkII vs 20d

please delete

post moved to gear talk


https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=8263105#p​ost8263105

I say 2nd one is the 5D MKII. Basing it on depth of field.

Post 100% crops, i bet that'd show a difference..

8 mp vs 21mp

you would totally see the difference!! BUT other than technical forums when do you get the opportunity to see 100% crops?

magazines? no
Billboards? no
TV? no
Giant blow ups? yeah haha
album covers? no
Photos use online? no


The fact that its hard to tell the difference certainly says a lot imho

The second is the 5D II unless you've edited the Exif manually!

hahaha

no i didn't edit the exif! yeah you got it right!

Looks like the 20D is still quite capable of taking some good photos...

Millions of people still think it is the camera that "takes good pitchurs." I've seen some really terrible stuff done with a $30,000.00 Hasselblad and some beautiful images taken with a point and shoot.

About 90% of what makes a good photograph is how it was lit. Greek: Photo=light graph=writing. The other 10% is everything else.

Benji

Well said benji!

ooops i meant to post this in gear talk

Interestingly I bought a 20D yesterday as a 'take on the beach' camera & having used it today I am delighted with the images - certainly at normal viewing sizes they compare very very well to the 5D and 50D - pretty much indistinguishable actually.

Phil