Yes it is, but which Canon is it.
I guess it's not too hard to check my gear list, but that would be cheating...
katodog Goldmember  More info | Dec 19, 2009 21:13 | #271 Yes it is, but which Canon is it. The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Chet showed up to keep the place interesting More info | Dec 19, 2009 21:13 | #272 70-200 f4 IS?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
katodog Goldmember More info | Dec 19, 2009 21:23 | #273 No, this is not the 70-200mm f/4 IS... The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lavanut Goldmember  More info | 100-400 f/4-5.6? I may be fascinated with volcanoes, but the name's Lisa.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
katodog Goldmember More info | Dec 19, 2009 21:38 | #275 No, it is not the 100-400mm f/4-5.6. The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lavanut Goldmember More info | OK, 70-200 2.8 I may be fascinated with volcanoes, but the name's Lisa.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
katodog Goldmember More info | Dec 19, 2009 21:40 | #277 Would that be the f/2.8 IS, or non-IS?? The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lavanut Goldmember More info | Picky picky!! I may be fascinated with volcanoes, but the name's Lisa.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
katodog Goldmember More info | Dec 19, 2009 21:49 | #279 No, it is not the 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS version. The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lavanut Goldmember More info | Well, I guess it's the IS version then, but I'm looking for the similar area on mine. I may be fascinated with volcanoes, but the name's Lisa.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
katodog Goldmember More info | Dec 19, 2009 21:52 | #281 No, it is not the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS either. The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
katodog Goldmember More info | Dec 19, 2009 21:53 | #282 It's not the f/4 IS The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Chet showed up to keep the place interesting More info | Dec 19, 2009 21:58 | #283 Dang the only White Lenses I know are the 70-200. I've never used one much seen one in person.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lavanut Goldmember More info | You sneaky boy! At least I feel better knowing I wasn't completely blind trying to see it on my 70-200. I may be fascinated with volcanoes, but the name's Lisa.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
katodog Goldmember More info | Dec 19, 2009 22:01 | #285 No, it is not the 300mm f/2.8 IS. The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1707 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
non-IS?
