Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Kids & Family 
Thread started 13 Jul 2009 (Monday) 22:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

first try with black muslin

 
mayerk
Senior Member
Avatar
426 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Bright, Indiana
     
Jul 13, 2009 22:31 |  #1

I went with a one light setup for this one. I think if I was to do it again I would have used a reflector on the left side but what the heck, I'm still learning. If anyone has any tips or anything, I'm all ears. Thanks


IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2442/3711476922_383b334015_b.jpg

_______________
Flickr (external link)
Gear & feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed.
Goldmember
Avatar
2,978 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: 2114.syd.nsw.au
     
Jul 14, 2009 06:21 |  #2

Maybe a snooted flash camera left, behind the subject to give a rim light?


http://www.edwardhor.c​om (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/edwardhor/ (external link)
http://www.modelmayhem​.com/EdwardHor (external link)
http://www.twitter.com​/edwardhor (external link)
justAL: PIxel peeping is what separates the men from the boys!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saqib
Goldmember
Avatar
1,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2003
     
Jul 14, 2009 11:56 |  #3

you can do some pp to get the back totally black. i have a video i can send you if you PM me your email.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roszell
Senior Member
Avatar
966 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 13
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Lafayette, LA
     
Jul 14, 2009 12:07 |  #4

Cute baby and I like the prop.

Her face looks a little dark/underexposed and flat... needs more contrast IMO. Also the crop could be a little tighter, too much black at the bottom.


R6 Mark II35L 70-200 2.8L IS II580EX II1.4x extender IIIRF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USMRF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rmr21
Goldmember
Avatar
1,938 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
     
Jul 14, 2009 12:13 |  #5

Definitely looks underexposed to me. Adorable subject though! :)


..............

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mayerk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
426 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Bright, Indiana
     
Jul 14, 2009 12:57 |  #6

rmr21 wrote in post #8278708 (external link)
Definitely looks underexposed to me. Adorable subject though! :)

Yeah, I found it was harder to get a good exposure with the black background. If I bumped the flash up a step it washed out the skin any lower was not bright enough. I must have been in the wrong metering mode.


_______________
Flickr (external link)
Gear & feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anthonyi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,362 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2008
Location: UK
     
Jul 14, 2009 15:35 |  #7

That's a great prop, too!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jul 14, 2009 17:03 |  #8

mayerk wrote in post #8278969 (external link)
Yeah, I found it was harder to get a good exposure with the black background. If I bumped the flash up a step it washed out the skin any lower was not bright enough. I must have been in the wrong metering mode.

Buy a flash meter. And you should be in manual exposure mode anyways in studio environment.

Cute baby BTW.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
swimchic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,378 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: Austin TX
     
Jul 15, 2009 12:29 as a reply to  @ bobbyz's post |  #9

I don't really think you need to go out and buy a flash meter. Just study the flash you do have and learn how to use it more effectively. This picture is very dark and the lighting is harsh. I agree you need more light. Did you have any natural light at all? When working with 1 flash it's best to try and use natural light then your flash for a little fill. If you spill a little too much light onto the background just burn it in Photoshop :)
HTH :)


-Jeni
My Website (external link) - My Blog (external link) - Flickr (external link)
5D Mark II - 24-70 - 100 Macro - 580 EX II - 430 - Radio Poppers - CS4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grimlock
Goldmember
Avatar
2,912 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Southern California Origin: Cybertron
     
Jul 15, 2009 16:10 |  #10

Agree with it being underexposed. But, I would also like to add that the foreground (black) is over done. Meaning, I feel that there's too much of it.

Crop some of the bottom?


- Jerry | Zenfolio (external link)

| 5DMarkII | 15FE | 35L | 85L |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonnoob
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,487 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Jul 15, 2009 16:28 |  #11

Here is what I came up with after some layer adjustments and such....

* I agree on the crop it needed to come up more.. there was too much dead space at the top.. the lighting is flat and harsh... photo was underexposed and lacking contrast. The subject is soft but i can see that the elmo eyes are sharp so it leads me to believe that is where you focused..your WB was also off..


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


David W.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mayerk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
426 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Bright, Indiana
     
Jul 15, 2009 16:40 |  #12

I must admit, that's much brighter, but on my monitor it looks much too bright and overexposed. The right side of her face seems to be washed out. But it brings up a very interesting idea, maybe my monitor needs calibration and that could be the issue. WB should be good, I used a grey card before shooting, the fact that its underexposed probably causes it to look off, at least thats my guess.


_______________
Flickr (external link)
Gear & feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonnoob
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,487 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Jul 15, 2009 17:09 |  #13

it looks off... the WB looks redish and warm... on yours...


David W.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Jul 15, 2009 17:18 |  #14

I think black demands a reflector, second light, or back light of some kind. It is too easy for the dark side of a subject to fall into the background. Unless that is what you were going for.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mayerk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
426 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Bright, Indiana
     
Jul 15, 2009 17:24 |  #15

Mark1 wrote in post #8286724 (external link)
I think black demands a reflector, second light, or back light of some kind. It is too easy for the dark side of a subject to fall into the background. Unless that is what you were going for.

I agree, I have a second light but chose to only use one to get pronounced shadows. I thought with a second light I would have problems achieving this, but looking at it now, A reflector would have been perfect.


_______________
Flickr (external link)
Gear & feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,635 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
first try with black muslin
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Kids & Family 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is slipper1963
1449 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.