This was taken a couple months ago. (slow edit)
Anyhow, the photo doesn't really seem to have the dimension I'm looking for. It seems very flat to me. I'm sure it's post prod related, but I can't put my finger on it.
Any pointers or ideas?
Grimlock Goldmember 2,912 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Southern California Origin: Cybertron More info | Jul 15, 2009 02:23 | #1 This was taken a couple months ago. (slow edit) - Jerry | Zenfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shannyD "...in too much trouble" 5,219 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit. More info | Jul 15, 2009 02:30 | #2 i think he could use a little more contrast.. and a little bit more light in his face.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grimlock THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,912 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Southern California Origin: Cybertron More info | Jul 15, 2009 02:59 | #3 Thanks for taking the time Shannon. - Jerry | Zenfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grimlock THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,912 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Southern California Origin: Cybertron More info | Jul 15, 2009 03:17 | #4 Ok, I added more contrast and bumped the fill up a bit. - Jerry | Zenfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grimlock THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,912 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Southern California Origin: Cybertron More info | Jul 15, 2009 03:30 | #5 Or maybe a less saturated version? Am I going further away from where I need to be, or getting closer? I think I have just stared at the photo so long that I don't know what looks good anymore. - Jerry | Zenfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cheiri Senior Member 689 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Jul 15, 2009 07:55 | #6 I like the more-saturated-contrasty one the best, actually. You know this may seem really silly, but was your lens focused on him/his face? It seems a teensy bit soft in that area, but it could just be me/the web compression. And the harsh sun/dark face is probably what's bothering you, though I still think this is an adorable picture & the composition is very nice. Looks like he had a lot of fun at the beach!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crazydays Member 209 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2009 More info | Jul 15, 2009 08:07 | #7 I happen to like the less saturated one- water color very cape cod "ish". Natural.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 15, 2009 08:29 | #8 I think I like the second one the best... but I like the desaturated look on the third one as well. R6 Mark II ☼ 35L ☼ 70-200 2.8L IS II ☼ 580EX II ☼ 1.4x extender III ☼ RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM ☼ RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TamEric Senior Member 738 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: South Africa More info | Jul 15, 2009 09:39 | #9 i like hte more contrasty shot the de saturated one looks funny but it might just be my monitor My kids and my family, are my life - and my passion is to capture my life on camera
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Jul 15, 2009 09:54 | #10 You should have used some fill-flash. Cute baby and I like the saturated look in #2 shot. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grimlock THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,912 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Southern California Origin: Cybertron More info | Jul 15, 2009 11:17 | #11 Thanks for the input everyone. - Jerry | Zenfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1123 guests, 125 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||