Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Member Activities 
Thread started 22 Nov 2007 (Thursday) 15:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

UK South-East "Mainly Under 5'11" Gossip Thread (5)

 
this thread is locked
Box ­ Brownie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,198 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Surrey
     
Oct 02, 2009 18:57 |  #6826

Anke wrote in post #8750118 (external link)
I'm thinking of calling the owners and explaining the situation that someone saw the photo I took and then offered to buy it, and then asking if they can.
What do you think of that solution?

Would you not then have to explain that it was up for sale even with the constraints of an editorial sale it is still "selling" isn't it???

The owners may not understand the difference ~ come to that even I am not sure I understand (completely) how one can sell such an image for editorial use but not 'commercial' usage? My head is starting to ache :lol:


That was a great meal ~ you must have a good set of pans :p
Images for a photographic memory (external link) | Flickr (external link) | >>>My 500px<<< (external link)
credit line is vanity, payment is sanity

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
THREAD ­ STARTER
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Oct 02, 2009 19:04 |  #6827

Box Brownie wrote in post #8750151 (external link)
Would you not then have to explain that it was up for sale even with the constraints of an editorial sale it is still "selling" isn't it???

The owners may not understand the difference ~ come to that even I am not sure I understand (completely) how one can sell such an image for editorial use but not 'commercial' usage? My head is starting to ache :lol:

I wasn't going to mention it was already on sale, I would just mention someone saw it.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adrian5127
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,208 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: London
     
Oct 02, 2009 19:12 |  #6828

KCY wrote in post #8749903 (external link)
Here's a little something i made,

Many many thanks to Mike for letting me use his drawings!!

Hope you like it :D

EDIT: made it smaller and slower

That is great!! No end to the talent here


Adrian
SE UK Thread here***Kit***smugmug (external link)
Wedding photography kent (external link)
Wedding photographer kent (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adrian5127
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,208 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: London
     
Oct 02, 2009 19:13 |  #6829

Chris
Is it definitely private property? It just looks like a normal street to me


Adrian
SE UK Thread here***Kit***smugmug (external link)
Wedding photography kent (external link)
Wedding photographer kent (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
THREAD ­ STARTER
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Oct 02, 2009 19:19 |  #6830

adrian5127 wrote in post #8750234 (external link)
Chris
Is it definitely private property? It just looks like a normal street to me

Definitely private. I'm always being asked if I'm a pro and if I'm shooting commercially and always say no, of course, because I'm not.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Box ­ Brownie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,198 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Surrey
     
Oct 02, 2009 19:19 |  #6831

Anke wrote in post #8750183 (external link)
I wasn't going to mention it was already on sale, I would just mention someone saw it.

Ah! just be carefull if you go that route to not dig yourself a whole.

Put yourself in their shoes......
you) someone saw my picture and wants to buy it
them) oh, where did they see it
you) on the www
them) please give us a link
you) er! Alamy
them) we have used Alamy before, that is a commercial sales site, isn't?
you) yes it is but I flagged it as editorial and now they have a client............

etc etc. When do you stop digging the hole that maybe you should have not started. I am being devils advocate here so possibly the best route is to negotiate with Alamy for the sale with some disclaimer being written into for you? If their client is that keen to use it the image that they will (effectively) pay to obtain the usage permission.

Hmmmm! just had a cynical thought, who is the client??? Is there a remote possibility that it is a representative of the owners........all the more reason to work Alamy and caveat the matter via Alamy to avoid getting burned. Edit - I am sure I read somewhere that some companies such as Ferrari pay folk to trawl the www to find if their intellectual property rights are being used without permission ~ that is what I was trying to describe 'here'.


That was a great meal ~ you must have a good set of pans :p
Images for a photographic memory (external link) | Flickr (external link) | >>>My 500px<<< (external link)
credit line is vanity, payment is sanity

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
THREAD ­ STARTER
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Oct 02, 2009 19:49 |  #6832

Box Brownie wrote in post #8750268 (external link)
Ah! just be carefull if you go that route to not dig yourself a whole.

Put yourself in their shoes......
you) someone saw my picture and wants to buy it
them) oh, where did they see it
you) on the www
them) please give us a link
you) er! Alamy
them) we have used Alamy before, that is a commercial sales site, isn't?
you) yes it is but I flagged it as editorial and now they have a client............

etc etc. When do you stop digging the hole that maybe you should have not started. I am being devils advocate here so possibly the best route is to negotiate with Alamy for the sale with some disclaimer being written into for you? If their client is that keen to use it the image that they will (effectively) pay to obtain the usage permission.

Hmmmm! just had a cynical thought, who is the client??? Is there a remote possibility that it is a representative of the owners........all the more reason to work Alamy and caveat the matter via Alamy to avoid getting burned. Edit - I am sure I read somewhere that some companies such as Ferrari pay folk to trawl the www to find if their intellectual property rights are being used without permission ~ that is what I was trying to describe 'here'.

I am getting a bit nervous on it. The buyer is already accepting all responsibility but I am thinking of calling the property owners and explaining the dilemma. i.e. someone wants to buy my image they saw, we'll both earn out of it, what do you say? They either say yes or no really.
What do you think?


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
THREAD ­ STARTER
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Oct 02, 2009 19:53 |  #6833

The buyer is a large telephone directory company apparently, nothing to do with the property owner.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Box ­ Brownie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,198 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Surrey
     
Oct 02, 2009 20:02 |  #6834

Anke wrote in post #8750418 (external link)
I am getting a bit nervous on it. The buyer is already accepting all responsibility but I am thinking of calling the property owners and explaining the dilemma. i.e. someone wants to buy my image they saw, we'll both earn out of it, what do you say? They either say yes or no really.
What do you think?

As perhaps indicated above I am looking at possible scenario.

So, were I in your shoes [note - not knowing the background to who said questioned you about your use of the images & indeed not knowing what weight you attach to the future 'rights' of picture taking access there & also possibly how long ago that image was taken]. How well do you know the owners? Is it a chat over a drink to explain type of relationship or a can I speak to Mr Smith a week come Thursday at 4pm type

My preference would be to negotiate only with Alamy ~ if I could not get them to cover my a*se then I would stick with editorial only. IMO if they can so cover the legal matters then subject to what they arrange and you accept the owners would be equally tied. Think of it this way your RTW blog attracts a lot of attention and I am sure the owners would not like to be seen as obstructive in furthering the reputation and businesses in that private area....???

Sorry, did not mean to ramble yet again.....it is your call but be comfortable with whatever decision you make i.e. make one & take it to the logical conclusion. Just think a 4 figure sum buys a nice lens ;)


That was a great meal ~ you must have a good set of pans :p
Images for a photographic memory (external link) | Flickr (external link) | >>>My 500px<<< (external link)
credit line is vanity, payment is sanity

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Box ­ Brownie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,198 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Surrey
     
Oct 02, 2009 20:06 |  #6835

Anke wrote in post #8750447 (external link)
The buyer is a large telephone directory company apparently, nothing to do with the property owner.

Hmm! it is possible such a company has a large budget and could/maybe/possibly stump up the funds to replicate your image with a commercial shoot if they fail to get yours.

Surely with such a 'local' picture this is for RTW comsumption so the owner and the businsses will see benefit from being on the directory (cover?)

See my feedback above.


That was a great meal ~ you must have a good set of pans :p
Images for a photographic memory (external link) | Flickr (external link) | >>>My 500px<<< (external link)
credit line is vanity, payment is sanity

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adrian5127
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,208 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: London
     
Oct 02, 2009 20:39 |  #6836

If it were me I would go ahead with the sale and let the buyer sought out the release.

However if you uncomfortable with this do as you suggest and approach the property owner. You can always say you put it on flickr and that was where it was seen.

As Laurence has said you risk the company going out and replicating your photograph and it would be a shame to risk losing the sale ( you know you want that 1D mkIV which is round the corner )


Adrian
SE UK Thread here***Kit***smugmug (external link)
Wedding photography kent (external link)
Wedding photographer kent (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
THREAD ­ STARTER
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Oct 02, 2009 20:45 |  #6837

Box Brownie wrote in post #8750489 (external link)
As perhaps indicated above I am looking at possible scenario.

So, were I in your shoes [note - not knowing the background to who said questioned you about your use of the images & indeed not knowing what weight you attach to the future 'rights' of picture taking access there & also possibly how long ago that image was taken]. How well do you know the owners? Is it a chat over a drink to explain type of relationship or a can I speak to Mr Smith a week come Thursday at 4pm type

My preference would be to negotiate only with Alamy ~ if I could not get them to cover my a*se then I would stick with editorial only. IMO if they can so cover the legal matters then subject to what they arrange and you accept the owners would be equally tied. Think of it this way your RTW blog attracts a lot of attention and I am sure the owners would not like to be seen as obstructive in furthering the reputation and businesses in that private area....???

Sorry, did not mean to ramble yet again.....it is your call but be comfortable with whatever decision you make i.e. make one & take it to the logical conclusion. Just think a 4 figure sum buys a nice lens ;)

Box Brownie wrote in post #8750508 (external link)
Hmm! it is possible such a company has a large budget and could/maybe/possibly stump up the funds to replicate your image with a commercial shoot if they fail to get yours.

Surely with such a 'local' picture this is for RTW comsumption so the owner and the businsses will see benefit from being on the directory (cover?)

See my feedback above.

I don't have the best relationship with them, the last time they tried to throw me off the premises as they thought I was a commercial shooter a few hours later the papers, radio and television were harassing them for why they did it. We haven't spoken since. This was a couple of years ago so they might have forgotten, but I doubt it. As you can see, this adds to my dilemma.
The sale would be good for everyone as we'd all make money and the advertising would be amazing. This is what my approach on the phone to the owners is going to be.

adrian5127 wrote in post #8750690 (external link)
If it were me I would go ahead with the sale and let the buyer sought out the release.

However if you uncomfortable with this do as you suggest and approach the property owner. You can always say you put it on flickr and that was where it was seen.

As Laurence has said you risk the company going out and replicating your photograph and it would be a shame to risk losing the sale ( you know you want that 1D mkIV which is round the corner )

I'm thinking of saying Flickr, but might not just mention anything at all.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
THREAD ­ STARTER
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Oct 02, 2009 20:54 |  #6838

Just found out that I took the picture in 2007, the current owners didn't buy the land until 2008 and before it was public property.

Make a difference?


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SwitchBlade
Goldmember
Avatar
2,748 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: The Garden of England
     
Oct 03, 2009 02:18 |  #6839

As far as I can see if it was public property when you took the photo then there's no wrong. If you'd sold the photo before they bought it they'd have no comeback so I don't see how it's any different.


5D | 40D | Σ24 f1.8 | 50 f1.8 II | 85 f1.8 | 70-200 F4L | 540EZ x2 | Nissin Di622

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kaben
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,408 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Maidstone, Kent, UK
     
Oct 03, 2009 02:27 as a reply to  @ SwitchBlade's post |  #6840

As long as all the exif is intact to show that it was indeed taken before they owned the property you will have no problems as far as i can tell.
The only thing is do you be polite and tell them, so they wont kick you off the next time you want to take a photo there?

Have you showed them your Blog? Since you write so positively about the area and review the local businesses, you should be seen as a positive force for RTW, not an evil money grabbing 'tog.

Show them that you have recently gained extra exposure for the area via newspaper articles etc referencing your blog.


Rob
My Gear []
My 500px [] (external link) My Flickr [] (external link)
BridgensPhotography.co​.uk (external link)WorldWar2Photography.c​o.uk (external link)
At Least Dreams Are Free
...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

657,162 views & 0 likes for this thread, 79 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
UK South-East "Mainly Under 5'11" Gossip Thread (5)
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Member Activities 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1788 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.