I have an I Mac and I need to get a card reader. Tip please.
britt777 Goldmember 1,148 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jan 2005 Location: Texas More info | Jul 19, 2009 21:22 | #1 I have an I Mac and I need to get a card reader. Tip please. Brittany
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Jul 19, 2009 21:33 | #2 Sandisk readers are very reliable. If your Apple has Firewire 800, make sure and get one for that, otherwise USB 2.0 and firewire 400 are pretty much the same as long as the USB 2.0 is not messed up by slower devices. Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I have the sandisk SDDR-92, but the driver says its only for window98. That can't be possible. I used it on my PC with vista Brittany
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Jul 19, 2009 21:40 | #4 That's an old reader that came out when Windows was just adding USB support. It should be "plug and play" with any newer system (XP, Vista, Apple). Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I will look on the sandisk site. guess I better get new reader, didn't need one on my PC. Thanks for the tips. Brittany
LOG IN TO REPLY |
philmar Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 20, 2009 15:34 | #6 Sandisk are reliable - there are better yet more expensive ones: Lexar & Delkin. A photo I took HERE published in National GeographicTime on your hands? Then HERE'S plenty more photos to nibble on
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scubthebub Senior Member 894 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Aliso Viejo, CA More info | Jul 20, 2009 15:37 | #7 i have a mac too, and i took the card reader i had for my PC and plugged it into the mac with no problems. As long as the package says it's OS X capatable, and drivers exist, you can get whatever you want. You can also call me Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
enilm Member 188 posts Joined Dec 2004 More info | Jul 20, 2009 18:59 | #8 Are the external one's faster than the internal? I currently have an internal which I have connected to a USB 2.0 plug but it's real slow at transferring files. The other day it took over 20 minutes to transfer 4GB from my card to the desktop. Or is that normal time? Canon 40D w/ kit lens 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6. No Flash, No lights, No other lenses. Just starting out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Jul 20, 2009 19:52 | #9 enilm wrote in post #8314429 Are the external one's faster than the internal? I currently have an internal which I have connected to a USB 2.0 plug but it's real slow at transferring files. The other day it took over 20 minutes to transfer 4GB from my card to the desktop. Or is that normal time? Some computer mfgs do short-change on peripherals, so yeah, your internal card reader is very possibly a USB 1.0 device. In fact, you should check out your USB ports as well in your Device Manager to make sure they are USB 2.0. It does take time to unload, say, 4 Gig of pics, but 20 minutes to merely copy seems a lot. Importing into something like Lightroom takes time, though, because you are doing more than just copying. Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
philmar Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 21, 2009 11:16 | #10 20 minutes to merely copy 4 Gig of pics is definitely too much. A photo I took HERE published in National GeographicTime on your hands? Then HERE'S plenty more photos to nibble on
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gnhntn Senior Member More info | Jul 23, 2009 15:40 | #11 Sandisk does make good readers, but any will actually serve your purpose. The one I have, and use, cost me 99 cents at Staples (I think this is where I got it), and works fine for what I need. I also have to agree 20 minutes is to long to copy 4 Gigs. I use 4 Gig cards (back each one up to a DVD before processing and reformatting) and a full one takes maybe 6 or 7 minutes at the most to copy over. The speed of your card could also factor into the time to copy them over to your desk top. "Why is it that children know how to forgive and forget...But adults forget how to forgive?"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drisley "What a Tool I am" 9,002 posts Likes: 108 Joined Nov 2002 More info | Jul 23, 2009 19:57 | #12 I've been using the Sandisk ImageMate 12-in-1 Reader/Writer EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 640 guests, 121 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||