I'm thinking of buying a 50D from Craigslist. I found a seller but he has no receipt for it. How would I go about claiming the warranty? I guess what I'm trying to ask is would you buy it without a receipt?
Jul 21, 2009 18:19 | #1 I'm thinking of buying a 50D from Craigslist. I found a seller but he has no receipt for it. How would I go about claiming the warranty? I guess what I'm trying to ask is would you buy it without a receipt?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Jul 21, 2009 18:20 | #2 No receipt, typically no warranty. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 21, 2009 18:27 | #3 Ahh dang it. I missed out on a brand new 50D and now I gotta resort to CL.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark_48 Goldmember 2,068 posts Joined Nov 2004 Location: Brookfield, MA More info | And even if you have the reciept, unless the camera was gifted to you, the warranty may not work for you. Megapixels and high ISO are a digital photographers heroin. Once you have a little, you just want more and more. It doesn't stop until your bank account is run dry.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 21, 2009 18:48 | #5 Yeah I read that before. I was just curious about the receipt though. I mean a lot of people buy and sell cameras and lenses on this forum so I was just curious if they really care about the warranty.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Jul 21, 2009 19:07 | #6 Buying an item < 1 year old does have it's benefits, unless there is no receipt to go along with it. It should affect the final selling price, imo. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark_48 Goldmember 2,068 posts Joined Nov 2004 Location: Brookfield, MA More info | Not having a reciept also may have other implications, like you don't know in what way the seller may have "acquired" the item he's selling. At least having a reciept with the sellers name on it bears some proof of ownership and you lessen the chance of getting something warm to the touch, at least on a Craigslist purchase. A POTN seller I wouldn't worry too much about a reciept. Megapixels and high ISO are a digital photographers heroin. Once you have a little, you just want more and more. It doesn't stop until your bank account is run dry.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 21, 2009 20:38 | #8 bohdank wrote in post #8320932 Buying an item < 1 year old does have it's benefits, unless there is no receipt to go along with it. It should affect the final selling price, imo. Yeah for sure. I will talk with the seller and go from there. Mark_48 wrote: Not having a reciept also may have other implications, like you don't know in what way the seller may have "acquired" the item he's selling. At least having a reciept with the sellers name on it bears some proof of ownership and you lessen the chance of getting something warm to the touch, at least on a Craigslist purchase. A POTN seller I wouldn't worry too much about a reciept. I don't how the prices are on a used 50D, but you might find something here as a refurb that fits your price range and carries a 1 year warranty from the seller. I've purchased refurb lenses and have been satisfied. http://www.adorama.com/SearchSite/De...%20refurbished Adorama looks good. I did look at their used/refurbished 50D but I could easily get a new one for the same price. I could have bought a new one for less than $1000 but I missed out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ToddR Senior Member 766 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: central Iowa More info | Jul 21, 2009 21:08 | #9 What is it with warranties not following the item to a new owner? Why should a manufacturer have less warranty liability just because someone sells the item in question?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 21, 2009 21:28 | #10 ToddR wrote in post #8321468 What is it with warranties not following the item to a new owner? Why should a manufacturer have less warranty liability just because someone sells the item in question? True- but the whole purpose of a limited warranty is that it only covers the first purchaser. I don't really get why it matters to the manufacturer but I guess it is what it is.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aphexii Member 76 posts Joined Aug 2007 More info | Jul 21, 2009 21:38 | #11 Exposure101 wrote in post #8321611 True- but the whole purpose of a limited warranty is that it only covers the first purchaser. I don't really get why it matters to the manufacturer but I guess it is what it is. Manufacturer's don't like warranties, but its an expected perk, so they take any possible way out of holding themselves liable for it. Feedback/References:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is johntmyers418 1209 guests, 184 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||