Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 22 Jul 2009 (Wednesday) 05:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

www.bludomain.com

 
penfolduk
Senior Member
Avatar
699 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 109
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Malvern, Worcestershire
     
Jul 22, 2009 05:43 |  #1

Anybody had experience of these guys? They look pretty good!

Any thoughts, experiences, ideas?

Phil


Fuji X-T3
Fuji 16-80mm F4
Viltrox 56mm F1.4
Wish list as long as your arm! and my arm! and my wife's arm! - you get the idea
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ace ­ of ­ Nothing
Member
Avatar
33 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Toronto / Geneva
     
Jul 27, 2009 11:42 |  #2

I use them. Nice sites, good price, ****ty customer service. Sometimes they get back to you in 24 hours, sometimes, not at all. Typically if it's a "real" problem they get back to you within 24 hours. If you have a non-urgent question, sometimes I don't hear from them at all.


Shooting with a 5D MarkII and using a Mac, in case I forgot to mention it in a post...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mchong75
Goldmember
2,927 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Frisco, TX
     
Jul 27, 2009 11:45 |  #3

Don't do it!

Why don't you goggle BluDomain customer service before you move forward.


(Michael) Gears:
5D MK III / Grip (2) | Canon 24-70L II | Canon 17-40L | Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mark II | 600EX-RT (2) | ST-E3-RT | PCB Einstein (2) | Pocket Wizard Plus III (4) | PCB 47" Octobox | Vagabond Mini | Kacey Beauty dish | Lee ND, GND & Big Stopper | Lastolite 24" x 24" | Gitzo 3541LS tripod | Markins Q20 w/ RRS B2 LR II | Sigma 35 Art | 85L II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KFormus
Member
189 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Jul 27, 2009 12:30 |  #4

I have two sites from them, love them. I don't host with them though.


5DII, 40D, 24-70 f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, 50 f/1.8 II, 580EXII, 580EX, ABR800

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michaelmjc
not cool enough
Avatar
4,834 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     
Jul 27, 2009 13:19 |  #5

I use them, the customer service at the start was ridiculous.. I waited over a week to get my site ready to edit.

However, now the site is up and running, I couldn't be happier.


Yyz Design (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shilophoto
Member
Avatar
225 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: NB Canada
     
Jul 27, 2009 16:13 |  #6

I'm looking into this site also, does anyone know if after you buy it can it be changed (info and pictures) at any time or is it a do it once and your stuck? (
I did read the faq's but this is my first time with a website and I have no idea what it is saying :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shimmishim
Goldmember
1,602 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
     
Jul 27, 2009 22:31 |  #7

Yes, the site is fully customizable and you can change the pictures and look anytime you want via a control panel that you have access to. it's easy and straight forward.


Call me John | JSP Blog (external link) | flickr (external link) |facebook (external link) | twitter (external link)
Canon 5D Mark III + a few L lenses
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=654812

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JDB
Senior Member
400 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
     
Jul 27, 2009 22:33 |  #8

Great product, worst customer service I've ever dealt with.


www.JasonBoulanger.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
R_Metzel
fish stick man!
Avatar
1,455 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Wisconsin Rapids, WI
     
Jul 27, 2009 22:40 |  #9

Dont host with them and as others said their CS is the worst I have ever dealt with...end product is really nice though... I got my site from them...


-Rob-
www.blacktiefoto.com (external link)
gear


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Jul 27, 2009 22:42 |  #10

Oops.. sorry... thought you were asking about web hosting, not design.

Nevermind.

In that case, I'd stay away from Flash websites.... more headache than they're worth and will get you absolutely nowhere for SEO and SE visibility.

{first post:
Go with LiquidWeb.com or LunarPages.com

I'm a web developer, and these are smaller outfits, but absolutely the best. I only use them or RackSpace. Rackspace is great, but extremely expensive unless you do this for a living.

With these two, you can get a human on the phone in minutes, and 90% of the time, it's an admin who can go over physically kick your box if need be.

I'd stay away from bluehost, bluedomain, bluegator, hostgator, etc.. They're all leased space at the Planet hosting center... Go with one of the smaller guys that actually own their datacenters.
}




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KFormus
Member
189 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Jul 28, 2009 11:24 |  #11

^^^^^^

With bludomain's admin panel you can control meta tags...


5DII, 40D, 24-70 f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, 50 f/1.8 II, 580EXII, 580EX, ABR800

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Jul 28, 2009 11:36 |  #12

KFormus wrote in post #8357093 (external link)
^^^^^^

With bludomain's admin panel you can control meta tags...


You know that meta tags have absolutely no value in Search engine optimization right? They're from the old days and are effectively useless.

The only thing that matters is real, bonafide, selectable html-based text. This is not something that you can get when using a flash-based website and thus will severely impair the visibility of your website to search engines.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
R_Metzel
fish stick man!
Avatar
1,455 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Wisconsin Rapids, WI
     
Jul 28, 2009 14:29 |  #13

Todd Lambert wrote in post #8357174 (external link)
You know that meta tags have absolutely no value in Search engine optimization right? They're from the old days and are effectively useless.

The only thing that matters is real, bonafide, selectable html-based text. This is not something that you can get when using a flash-based website and thus will severely impair the visibility of your website to search engines.

You sound like you know what you are talking about...so... After having a nice fully html based website for 2 years then moved to a full flash via bludomain our traffic went up, and we went from about the 4th page on google using varies searches to the #3 spot on the first page...all withing the last 8 months.

Please explain cause I am not knowledgeable when it comes to SEO.

Thanks! :)


-Rob-
www.blacktiefoto.com (external link)
gear


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Jul 28, 2009 16:20 |  #14

It's hard to say without seeing the site... but it could be due to link popularity, your page rank increased, if it's a newer site (less than 2 years) it could be the site has been removed from the sandbox, etc... There's tons of variables to SERPs. The fact that your site was HTML before, may account for it even. Like I said, it's hard to say.

[edit - did a little digging, if this is your site:]
If the site in question is blacktiefoto... the site currently has a pagerank of 2 out of 10(you can't get a 10 so you'd ideally like to be at least a 3,4, or 5.) The domain has existed since Sept 2007, so you are indeed out of the Sandbox. The domain is only being renewed on a yearly basis which hurts your rankings. Google likes domains that are registered for more than two years in advance. The blog you have is probably helping you a bit, although it shows a PR of 2 as well... which is kind of odd - especially for blogspot sites. They usually tend to a bit better, but that blog is where you're ranking is coming from. The blog is giving your site link juice.

You're title tag is very bad. The only saving grace is that it has the word photography in it. It should have several other keywords that you wish to be found in Google by. These should also change from page to page, which cannot happen with your site, since the entire site encompasses one page with the Flash.

Here is what Google sees when it looks at your site:

IMAGE: http://lambertphotography.com/forums/others/badseo.png

Not much there, is there?

You only have two links back to your website. One from POTN here, and another from stevenspoint-holiday-inn.com

Google has a whopping total of 9 pages indexed, related to your domain name. Of those 9, only 1 is valid and the rest actually either show errors or go to blank, empty directories. This is KILLING you.

Your site does not use a sitemap xml file, nor does it have a robots.txt file -the are big things that could help quite a bit (no so much with Flash, but with a normal site they would be golden)

Keyword density for the word photography:

Meta keywords: 2: 14: 14.3%
Meta description: 0: 20: 0%
Bold: 0: 0: 0%
Links: 0: 6: 0%
H1/H2/H3: 0: 0: 0%
Body: 0: 27: 0%
Title: 1: 4: 25%

That's not good.

You have pricing information visible, you know that right? There is an oldwedding.pdf file with pricing and a proposal/contract file for Kowalksky.. I bet Amy doesn't want her financial information being shared on the web, nor do you, I'd imagine.

I could go on but what I've listed, if corrected, would over time, greatly increase your website visibility.

I do web development for a living, and ranking results are historically much worse for Flash-based websites. Unless you're using blackhat techniques to embed keywords and other illegal methods of acquiring ranking, an html based site will do much better than a flash based one, every time.

That said, no matter what.. the best way to increase traffic and gain SE visibility is to produce good content often. Also getting other sites linked to you, become "authoritative" in your particular market and niche, etc.. all of these contribute to your ranking position and thus traffic.

Hope that helps... feel free to ask questions and I'll help how I can.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
R_Metzel
fish stick man!
Avatar
1,455 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Wisconsin Rapids, WI
     
Jul 28, 2009 16:36 |  #15

Todd Lambert wrote in post #8358489 (external link)
It's hard to say without seeing the site... but it could be due to link popularity, your page rank increased, if it's a newer site (less than 2 years) it could be the site has been removed from the sandbox, etc... There's tons of variables to SERPs. The fact that your site was HTML before, may account for it even. Like I said, it's hard to say.

[edit - did a little digging, if this is your site:]
If the site in question is blacktiefoto... the site currently has a pagerank of 2 out of 10(you can't get a 10 so you'd ideally like to be at least a 3,4, or 5.) The domain has existed since Sept 2007, so you are indeed out of the Sandbox. The domain is only being renewed on a yearly basis which hurts your rankings. Google likes domains that are registered for more than two years in advance. The blog you have is probably helping you a bit, although it shows a PR of 2 as well... which is kind of odd - especially for blogspot sites. They usually tend to a bit better, but that blog is where you're ranking is coming from. The blog is giving your site link juice.

You're title tag is very bad. The only saving grace is that it has the word photography in it. It should have several other keywords that you wish to be found in Google by. These should also change from page to page, which cannot happen with your site, since the entire site encompasses one page with the Flash.

Here is what Google sees when it looks at your site:
QUOTED IMAGE

Not much there, is there?

You only have two links back to your website. One from POTN here, and another from stevenspoint-holiday-inn.com

Google has a whopping total of 9 pages indexed, related to your domain name. Of those 9, only 1 is valid and the rest actually either show errors or go to blank, empty directories. This is KILLING you.

Your site does not use a sitemap xml file, nor does it have a robots.txt file -the are big things that could help quite a bit (no so much with Flash, but with a normal site they would be golden)

Keyword density for the word photography:

Meta keywords: 2: 14: 14.3%
Meta description: 0: 20: 0%
Bold: 0: 0: 0%
Links: 0: 6: 0%
H1/H2/H3: 0: 0: 0%
Body: 0: 27: 0%
Title: 1: 4: 25%

That's not good.

You have pricing information visible, you know that right? There is an oldwedding.pdf file with pricing and a proposal/contract file for Kowalksky.. I bet Amy doesn't want her financial information being shared on the web, nor do you, I'd imagine.

I could go on but what I've listed, if corrected, would over time, greatly increase your website visibility.

I do web development for a living, and ranking results are historically much worse for Flash-based websites. Unless you're using blackhat techniques to embed keywords and other illegal methods of acquiring ranking, an html based site will do much better than a flash based one, every time.

That said, no matter what.. the best way to increase traffic and gain SE visibility is to produce good content often. Also getting other sites linked to you, become "authoritative" in your particular market and niche, etc.. all of these contribute to your ranking position and thus traffic.

Hope that helps... feel free to ask questions and I'll help how I can.

Well that was very informative! Thanks... As for the cheese music and what not, my business and traffic tripled since the site went live and my clients always comment on how much they love the website, so it works for me for right now! ;) You know how quick people change what they like though!


-Rob-
www.blacktiefoto.com (external link)
gear


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,561 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
www.bludomain.com
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1306 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.