I wouldn't let that stop me, that's what adapters are for.

-Bruce
But you'd need to exchange the focusing screen as well, so I'd say it's better to get a matching body with split circle.
pekelnik Member 165 posts Joined Apr 2011 Location: Switzerland More info | Aug 30, 2011 01:14 | #1231 Ballen Photo wrote in post #13010752 I wouldn't let that stop me, that's what adapters are for. ![]() -Bruce But you'd need to exchange the focusing screen as well, so I'd say it's better to get a matching body with split circle.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kokakaste2 Goldmember 3,546 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Luxembourg More info | Aug 30, 2011 03:16 | #1232 TheBurningCrown wrote in post #13022388 Hammer. Definitely hammer.
Oskar (Oscar) - stuff I use- Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
krb Cream of the Crop 8,818 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together More info | Aug 30, 2011 10:13 | #1233 roosterslayer wrote in post #13022456 i mean how do i get a larger f stop (as in going from 16 to 1.4). i've tried forcing it and it just won't come off. i think i know why since there is this pin that attaches to the silver thing on the very left as shown in this picture. ![]() i have no clue how to move it though. i've never owned a nikon film camera so i'm pretty lost. "The silver thing on the left" is simply used to tell the camera body what aperture the lens is set to for metering purposes. If that pin is prevent the aperture ring from moving then there is something wrong inside the camera body. -- Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikewinburn Goldmember 1,609 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2010 Location: NYC More info | Aug 30, 2011 20:26 | #1234 krb wrote in post #13024302 "The silver thing on the left" is simply used to tell the camera body what aperture the lens is set to for metering purposes. If that pin is prevent the aperture ring from moving then there is something wrong inside the camera body. while i haven't use that model camera, Nikon/Nikkors all work basically the same. Gear: The Official Gear List / Market Feedback / Sig thread #2468
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DinosaurioAllie Senior Member 525 posts Joined Dec 2010 Location: Cedar Rapids, IA More info | Aug 30, 2011 20:59 | #1235 I'm seriously thinking about investing in having some hardcover portfolio books made. My only problem is that I'm not quite sure how to go about it. I know I'm getting it printed from Adoramapix. Canon 7D | Canon 100mm f/2.8 | Canon 40mm f/2.8 | Mamiya RB67 | Mamiya Sekor 90mm f/3.8 | http://www.flickr.com/mosbeckphotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Aug 30, 2011 21:52 | #1236 I've had mixed results with Adorama. The first book came out great but the second had a misaligned page when it was glued and pulled out a bit when the book was opened. Apple does a great job, though they're a bit more expensive. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
helloagain36 Goldmember 1,494 posts Likes: 4 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Owls Head, Maine More info | if it is balanced across all genres (meaning you don't have 2 macro shots and 37 landscape shots) I'd put everything in one book split it out like chapters for each grouping of photos. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cuypers1807 Intact? 1,840 posts Likes: 414 Joined May 2008 Location: Equally far from everything! More info | Aug 30, 2011 22:59 | #1238 Tony-S wrote in post #13027699 I've had mixed results with Adorama. The first book came out great but the second had a misaligned page when it was glued and pulled out a bit when the book was opened. Apple does a great job, though they're a bit more expensive. My last apple books were terrible. The exposures were still pretty dark even after i compensated for printing and all my black and white shots had a pinkish color cast. Joby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DinosaurioAllie Senior Member 525 posts Joined Dec 2010 Location: Cedar Rapids, IA More info | Aug 30, 2011 23:25 | #1239 I've personally had some bad things about Blurb, at least compared to Adoramapix. I guess they're pretty nice books, but Adoramapix has the upper hand with the genuine photo paper and quite thick pages. Canon 7D | Canon 100mm f/2.8 | Canon 40mm f/2.8 | Mamiya RB67 | Mamiya Sekor 90mm f/3.8 | http://www.flickr.com/mosbeckphotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kokakaste2 Goldmember 3,546 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Luxembourg More info | Aug 31, 2011 02:14 | #1240 Used Blurb before, no problems. Oskar (Oscar) - stuff I use- Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nathan96 Senior Member 267 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: Adelaide, Australia More info |
C.Michael Senior Member 754 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Adelaide, South Australia More info | Aug 31, 2011 09:46 | #1242 nathan96 wrote in post #13029077 Put my Vietnam trip into an adorama book. Very Very professional I did Cambodia and Vietnam last year, we have many things in common mr Nathan! www.christophermorrison.com.au
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HelenOster That's me! 4,593 posts Likes: 659 Joined Jul 2008 Location: New York More info | Aug 31, 2011 13:29 | #1243 Tony-S wrote in post #13027699 I've had mixed results with Adorama. The first book came out great but the second had a misaligned page when it was glued and pulled out a bit when the book was opened. Did we re-print it for you? If not, please email me with a couple of pictures & let's see if we can get that done for you: Helen@adorama.com DinosaurioAllie wrote in post #13028101 ......Adoramapix has the upper hand with the genuine photo paper and quite thick pages. Thank you! There's a very comprehensive comparison here: http://nickcarverphotography.com/blog/?cat=129 nathan96 wrote in post #13029077 Put my Vietnam trip into an adorama book. Very Very professional
I'll pass your feedback on to the team at the lab - I know they'll be delighted!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DinosaurioAllie Senior Member 525 posts Joined Dec 2010 Location: Cedar Rapids, IA More info | Aug 31, 2011 17:34 | #1244 My only problem is that they're expensive. Which, is very understandable considering the quality though. Canon 7D | Canon 100mm f/2.8 | Canon 40mm f/2.8 | Mamiya RB67 | Mamiya Sekor 90mm f/3.8 | http://www.flickr.com/mosbeckphotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LuisArturo Member 172 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2010 More info | Aug 31, 2011 18:39 | #1245 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1520 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||