Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 26 Jul 2009 (Sunday) 17:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Review: Benro C-068m8 + B-0

 
justrussfm
Member
110 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: New York City
     
Jul 26, 2009 17:41 |  #1

Review: Benro Travel Angel C-068m8 + B-0 +PU-50

This review is meant to give one more perspective on the great Benro/Induro debate. I’m happy with the product—though surely a few voices will say I’m crazy. At some point I may break down the head in order to see what changes have been made, if any, to the design of the infamous “pot metal… poor engineering” breakdown from some time ago on a different line of Benro ballheads.

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/1.jpg

(DUPLICATE IMAGE)

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/2.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/3.jpg

Specs w/ ballhead:

Folded length – 14”
Weight – 1.96 lbs/0.8 kg*

* According to a Benro Marketing Manager, there are two versions of this tripod, and the one sold in the kit has a lighter center column. I think that the difference is that the “kit” version comes without a real mounting plate to reduce weight and column height, and to allow the legs to fold tight. The weight reduction to the “kit” legs because of this is ~ 0.2 kg. Mine lacks a true mounting plate. As far as I can tell, this only applies to the 0-series legs.

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/5.jpg

Max Height – 45” to top of QR, 49” to viewfinder (5D)
Max Height w/ Column – 53” to top of QR, 57” to viewfinder (5D)
Min Height – 14”

Max Cross Section folded – Hard to determine, but 3” to 4” depending how you measure.
Leg Diameter – 22mm (biggest)/13mm (smallest)
Leg Sections – 4; top 3 non-rotating, bottom rotating.

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/6.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/7.jpg

Russ
NYC - Western MA - Thailand For Sale: Oly 24mm f/2.8, Peleng 8mm FE
Gear: 5Dmk2 | Peleng 8mm FE | Tamron SP 17mm (151b) | Oly 24mm f/2.8 | 35mm f/1.4L | FL 55mm f/1.2 | 135mm f/2.0L | Benro Travel Angel C-068m8 + B-0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
justrussfm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: New York City
     
Jul 26, 2009 17:42 |  #2

Background on what I was after:

My goal was to find an ultra-light, ultra-compact tripod for extended travel through sometimes dangerous locations where I can’t be encumbered by heavy, bulky gear. Dead stability and full height were not the driving forces here, though maximizing both within the constraints of size, weight, and ease of use were obviously important. I didn’t want to be stuck with a true table-top tripod or ground pod. Money was not a primary factor here, nor was trying to find an all-around perfect tripod. I was after a niche product.

Why I chose a Benro instead of a Gitzo or Feisol:

I was considering three other tripods: Gitzo 1550t, Gitzo 1541t, and Feisol 3441s. All three have advantages over the Benro combination I purchased, though at the same time couldn’t match the Benro specs I was after. This search was initiated via the Gitzo 0-series tripods (0531/0541), though without having a 0-series that folds over the center column, the folded length was too long for my needs.

The 1550t is light enough (when used with its insufficient, included ballhead), and folds compact enough—but has 5 legs when I wanted 4 max. (I also wasn’t interested in the ballhead that came with it, and third party heads would compromise the weight/compactness of this tripod.)

The 1541t has 4 leg sections, but only folds to 16 inches, and weighs 2.1 lbs without a ballhead. Advantages: This leg set is probably more stable than the Benro.

The Feisol 3441s has 4 leg sections too, but only folds to 17 inches, weighs 2.2 lbs without a ballhead, and has rotating legs. A shorter center column would bring the weight down, but wouldn’t change the folded size. That and the rotating legs killed it for me. Advantages: This legset, with a 28mm largest leg diameter, is probably more stable then both the Benro and the 1-series Gitzo traveler, and reaches higher.

Only the Benro could get me in at ~2 to 2.2 lbs with a ballhead, fold down to 14 inches, and do it all with 4 leg sections that don’t rotate (the last leg rotating doesn’t have any impact on use; see below). As long as the Benro was up to the task—and stable enough for the lenses I wanted to use—the specs would be the deciding factor. Neither Gitzo, nor Feisol, nor Induro or any other manufacturer that I felt comfortable with made a tripod with comparable specs. It Gitzo makes a 0-series Traveler design, I’ll reconsider.


Russ
NYC - Western MA - Thailand For Sale: Oly 24mm f/2.8, Peleng 8mm FE
Gear: 5Dmk2 | Peleng 8mm FE | Tamron SP 17mm (151b) | Oly 24mm f/2.8 | 35mm f/1.4L | FL 55mm f/1.2 | 135mm f/2.0L | Benro Travel Angel C-068m8 + B-0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
justrussfm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: New York City
     
Jul 26, 2009 17:42 |  #3

Construction:

Side-by-side with comparable Gitzo legs, the Benro feels up to par. The bolts that the legs rotate on were a little too stiff for me when I bought the legs, so I used the included tool to loosen them the tiniest bit; the tighter setup is probably a hair more stable.

The leg sections are stiff when locked, and lock tight. Unlike some of the other inexpensive brands, Benro has a tiny set screw (see photo) that holds the center column bolt mechanism down tight. The center column uses the same construction to secure the screw mechanism at the bottom of the center column for the spring-loaded weight hook. The center column is grooved so that it does not rotate. The rubber, bottom feet unscrew and can be replaced with pointed, metal feet. All the moving parts that need it are well-greased, and fit TIGHTLY together. The fit is very precise, the cutting/molding is very clean (any mess you see is just grease).

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/4.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/8.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/9.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/10.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/11.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/12.jpg


[URL][URL]http://photo​s.russjuskalian.com/20​09/07/25/15.jpg

As you can see, the legs use a similar anti-rotation lock mechanism to found in Gitzo and other brands. It’s actually just a sleeve of some kind of white, plastic-like material. The black, locking ring looks very similar to the Gitzo gravity lock, though I think it functions differently.

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/16.jpg


IMAGE: http://photos.russjusk​alian.com/2009/07/25/1​7.jpg


The set came with a simple tool to tighten/loosen the bolts, and a very nice bag with a shoulder strap. The bag is well constructed, has a small internal pocket, and can easily fit the tripod with a larger, taller head.

Russ
NYC - Western MA - Thailand For Sale: Oly 24mm f/2.8, Peleng 8mm FE
Gear: 5Dmk2 | Peleng 8mm FE | Tamron SP 17mm (151b) | Oly 24mm f/2.8 | 35mm f/1.4L | FL 55mm f/1.2 | 135mm f/2.0L | Benro Travel Angel C-068m8 + B-0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
justrussfm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: New York City
     
Jul 26, 2009 17:43 |  #4

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/21.jpg

Use:

The tripod is a pleasure to use. The legs slide in and out very smoothly/easily, and with one short throw of the locks (1/4 twist), all the leg sections can be unlocked at once due to the anti-rotation locks. That the last leg section rotates does not matter because there obviously isn’t any sort of twist lock on it. Pulling on the shortest leg with a smooth tug extends the whole leg. Once the legs sections are retuned to the closed position, all of the leg locks can be similarly locked with another short throw.

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/13.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/14.jpg

The legs can fold over the ballhead and center column to fold this tripod down to a compact size. It’s rather incredible.

The legs are very stable for use with wide to short-telephoto lenses, but the difference in stability between being put in low-angle positions with only one or two legs extended vs. the tall position with all legs extended is definitely noticeable when the camera is mounted and I try to manually induce vibrations into the system. At lower positions and less than full leg extension, the tripod is VERY stable with 5D and 135L.

Full leg extension, with the center column extended is obviously less stable, though I had no trouble making sharp images with MLU and the 135L combination; I would not use this tripod at full extension, with center column up, with the 5D + 135L in strong wind. Adding weight to the center column significantly increased the stability. This is NOT a long-lens tripod, and its intended use is for my 5D, 24mm, 35mm, and 135mm (on rare occasions). I may add a 16-35mm. With those lenses, the tripod excels in all positions with a little care.

I’m not a huge fan of the rubber grip/locking mechanism on the center column. I would prefer a solid, molded “knock-off” wheel style locking mechanism—but I assume the rubber leg-lock style is used to keep the weight down.

Unfortunately, there is no stock way to do something like the ground-set on a Gitzo. You can remove the center column and flip it upside down, though it’s a bit of a pain to do this. That said, the 14” minimum height limit is fine for me.

One thing I noticed myself doing is not fully tightening the center column at times. This is stupid for a couple reasons, but I found myself doing it because the center column takes a decent amount of resistance to slide up and down—and the groove in it that prevents it from turning gives the false impression that the column is locked. It’s not a big problem with the column down (which is how I mostly shoot), but the whole system is more stable when the column is locked down securely.

This tripod is LIGHT, and folds down super compactly. I can throw it inside (!) a regular backpack with some cloths and two lenses and not notice I even have it in there. I don’t hesitate to take it with me.

Russ
NYC - Western MA - Thailand For Sale: Oly 24mm f/2.8, Peleng 8mm FE
Gear: 5Dmk2 | Peleng 8mm FE | Tamron SP 17mm (151b) | Oly 24mm f/2.8 | 35mm f/1.4L | FL 55mm f/1.2 | 135mm f/2.0L | Benro Travel Angel C-068m8 + B-0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
justrussfm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: New York City
     
Jul 26, 2009 17:43 |  #5

Ballhead:

These legs usually come with the B-00 ballhead, but having heard that the standard ballhead is the weakest link in the system for these legs, I found a seller who had (or made) a package with the larger, B-0 ballhead. It’s possible that my legs would close ever so slightly tighter with a smaller ballhead, but I don’t think the difference would be noticeable without a close measurement; it surely wouldn’t make any difference in packing or use.

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/18.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/19.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/20.jpg

Not much to complain about this head. It’s super smooth, locks down tight, with no slip/creep in the panning lock or ball. Could it lock tighter? Maybe. I didn’t want to test what the failure point was. I’d like to try the smallest Photo Clam, which weighs the same as this ballhead. The QR takes AS plates, and locks down securely and easily. Given my use for this ballhead, I find the friction knob superfluous (another reason to go with the Photo Clam), but the panning knob quite useful and well made.

The head is not ideal for the 135L + 5D combination at a steep angle. Does it work? Yes. Do I have to be careful, use MLU, and lock it down tight? Yes. With my other lenses: Peleng 8mm, Oly 24mm, 35mm L, FL 55 f/1.2, any angle locks down securely and easily.

Given the online breakdown of an older, different model ballhead from Benro, I do wonder what the internal construction of this ballhead consists of. I hope to break this one down at some point—but not until I have a replacement (Photo Clam PC-30N).

Russ
NYC - Western MA - Thailand For Sale: Oly 24mm f/2.8, Peleng 8mm FE
Gear: 5Dmk2 | Peleng 8mm FE | Tamron SP 17mm (151b) | Oly 24mm f/2.8 | 35mm f/1.4L | FL 55mm f/1.2 | 135mm f/2.0L | Benro Travel Angel C-068m8 + B-0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
justrussfm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: New York City
     
Jul 26, 2009 17:44 |  #6

Service:

Well, I can’t speak to what getting service will actually be like, but my one experience dealing with the Mac Group was great. I had questions about getting a shorter center column, using the B-0 ballhead instead of the B-00, and the difference between the “kit” version of the legs and the stand-alone version. Benro’s US Marketing Product Manager emailed me back personally, and we had a great back-and-forth discussion about some of the details of what I was asking about. It was great to be able to get in touch with someone so easily, and to have my questions answered so quickly. This, at least, was reassuring.

Caveats:

Benro is relatively new, there’s at least one report of an older, sketchy ballhead internal design (much posted about), and doesn’t have a huge presence in the U.S. yet. They are clearly the same company as Induro (both under the umbrella as the Mac Group), though offering different, non-overlapping models in some cases. It’s not clear what the customer support will be like, whether this will last, and how difficult getting replacement parts will be.

The bottom line for me is that price aside, only Benro had the tripod that most closely fit my needs as far as specs go: 4 legs, as close to 2 lbs as possible, stable, 14 or 15 inches closed (smaller better), 4’ to 5’ height, carbon fiber, and well built. If Gitzo made something comparable, I would have considered it—and I don’t doubt that the Gitzo would be great, with a great company behind it. I would love to test this against a 0-series Traveler tripod by Gitzo.

I wouldn’t necessarily just buy a Benro if I wanted something bigger, and more solid, for long lenses. I think a Gitzo or Feisol (if they get anti-rotation legs) would be the first place I look. But I’d see what Benro had to offer, and I’d seriously consider it.

A few more size comparison shots:

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/22.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/23.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/24.jpg

IMAGE: http://photos.russjuskalian.com/2009/07/25/25.jpg

Russ
NYC - Western MA - Thailand For Sale: Oly 24mm f/2.8, Peleng 8mm FE
Gear: 5Dmk2 | Peleng 8mm FE | Tamron SP 17mm (151b) | Oly 24mm f/2.8 | 35mm f/1.4L | FL 55mm f/1.2 | 135mm f/2.0L | Benro Travel Angel C-068m8 + B-0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scot079
Goldmember
Avatar
3,839 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2007
Location: Maryland USA
     
Jul 26, 2009 20:00 |  #7

Great tripod for hiking/traveling. Mine fits perfectly on the outside of the Lowepro Primus AW, which hangs nicely on the hook for added stability when the tripod is in use.


- Tim
www.timadkinsphoto.com (external link)
GEARandFEEDBACK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headshotzx
Goldmember
Avatar
4,488 posts
Likes: 141
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Singapore
     
Jul 27, 2009 03:06 |  #8

Thank you for a great review! I'm looking to purchase something like that at the end of year for my travels and will definitely look into this, or the C069/C169. Cheers!


Zexun | Flickr (external link) | YouTube (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,393 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jul 27, 2009 23:02 as a reply to  @ Headshotzx's post |  #9

yes. nice review. thank you.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bonnicagi
Member
47 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Jul 28, 2009 23:55 as a reply to  @ ed rader's post |  #10

Great review!
Im still on the edge of buying one

Can I ask where did you get it from? off ebay? was it from a seller in HK who was offering free EMS shipping and a toy camera?

Those packages come with a B-00 head, but Im wondering if I should get a B-0 like you...

however, but what confuses me is the the max load on c-068 is 6 kg, and the ball head b-0 is 8 kg....doesnt that mean the limit is still 6 kg?

thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
javanutsy
Senior Member
Avatar
751 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Jul 29, 2009 00:42 |  #11

Great review! I recently bought the C068-M8 legs only from BHPhoto, but the fold seems different than yours. On mine, the center column seems longer and head platform is even with the legs when reverse folded. (See below for a photo of my tripod folded.) I guess the kit version comes with a shorter center column besides the platform difference? Strange.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

galleryexternal link | gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
justrussfm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: New York City
     
Aug 02, 2009 19:32 |  #12

bonnicagi wrote in post #8360788 (external link)
Great review!
Im still on the edge of buying one

Can I ask where did you get it from? off ebay? was it from a seller in HK who was offering free EMS shipping and a toy camera?

Those packages come with a B-00 head, but Im wondering if I should get a B-0 like you...

however, but what confuses me is the the max load on c-068 is 6 kg, and the ball head b-0 is 8 kg....doesnt that mean the limit is still 6 kg?

thanks

I got mine from eBay. Don't have the seller's info offhand, but I did talk with a few, and the ones with a lot of feedback seem kosher. Of course, I have no idea what buying one from eBay means for warranty and all that; I assume it's moot, since I can't imagine the Mac Group (who represents Benro in the US) is going to repair gear they didn't sell. Just a thought.

The lowest weight rating is the limit. Of course, I would take those limits with grain of salt-- the tripod may hold 6 kg (in fact, I think it would hold a LOT more), but it probably won't hold a 6 kg camera + lens combo at any sort of angle with any sort of steadiness.

Like I said, my 5D with the 135L seems to be a healthy limit for this setup once it is fully extended. Also, I have been happy with this ballhead-- and it was cheap as a combo-- but I'm still not convinced that it's as good as some of the alternatives (Photo Clam, for instance).

I've read a few reviews that said the B-00 was more of a limiting factor than the legs, that's why I went with the B-0 (and it didn't cost much more). But I do plan on putting on a Photo Clam at some point in the future. (Of course, I just had a great weekend making long exposure shots with my 35L and Oly 24mm 2.8, so I'm in no rush at the moment to upgrade the ballhead.)


Russ
NYC - Western MA - Thailand For Sale: Oly 24mm f/2.8, Peleng 8mm FE
Gear: 5Dmk2 | Peleng 8mm FE | Tamron SP 17mm (151b) | Oly 24mm f/2.8 | 35mm f/1.4L | FL 55mm f/1.2 | 135mm f/2.0L | Benro Travel Angel C-068m8 + B-0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
justrussfm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: New York City
     
Aug 02, 2009 19:36 |  #13

bonnicagi wrote in post #8360788 (external link)
Great review!
Im still on the edge of buying one

Can I ask where did you get it from? off ebay? was it from a seller in HK who was offering free EMS shipping and a toy camera?

Those packages come with a B-00 head, but Im wondering if I should get a B-0 like you...

however, but what confuses me is the the max load on c-068 is 6 kg, and the ball head b-0 is 8 kg....doesnt that mean the limit is still 6 kg?

thanks

One more thing... even if you're not going to keep the ballhead that comes in the "kit" package, you may wan to get the "kit" legs, since they include a shorter, slightly lighter center column so that with a ballhead attached the legs still fold completely over the center column + legs.

This is one area it would make sense if Benro would point out the difference more clearly. I didn't know about this until I bought the legs.


Russ
NYC - Western MA - Thailand For Sale: Oly 24mm f/2.8, Peleng 8mm FE
Gear: 5Dmk2 | Peleng 8mm FE | Tamron SP 17mm (151b) | Oly 24mm f/2.8 | 35mm f/1.4L | FL 55mm f/1.2 | 135mm f/2.0L | Benro Travel Angel C-068m8 + B-0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
javanutsy
Senior Member
Avatar
751 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Aug 02, 2009 20:40 |  #14

justrussfm wrote in post #8387206 (external link)
This is one area it would make sense if Benro would point out the difference more clearly. I didn't know about this until I bought the legs.

Yeah, I wish they were more clear on this too. I didn't know the differences until after I bought as well.


galleryexternal link | gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rebop
Senior Member
789 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 96
Joined May 2005
     
Oct 05, 2009 16:41 |  #15

Glad I found this thread. I have been wondering why my center column is different than all the pictures I have seen for this tripod and now I know. I use a Markins Q3T on mine and would love to have it fold just that little bit shorter.

Anyone know if the shorter center column is available for sale by itself anywhere?

Thanks.

~Bob


I'm Bob and I'm an L-coholic
R3 - RF 14-35
L - RF 24-70 L - RF 24-105 L - RF Thrifty-Nifty 50
RF 70-200 2.8 L - EF 70-300 L - EF 100 2.8 L Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

21,814 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Review: Benro C-068m8 + B-0
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1178 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.