I was waiting on the hummer or the finch to try a shot with the 1.4 tc but only this little bird showed up.
dcsmith40D Senior Member 543 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Atlanta More info | Jul 28, 2009 19:49 | #1 I was waiting on the hummer or the finch to try a shot with the 1.4 tc but only this little bird showed up. Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 28, 2009 19:54 | #3 Thanks Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 28, 2009 20:59 | #4 I really like these. Great color and a nicely composed setting. The flowers really frame the shot well. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 28, 2009 21:25 | #5 Nighthound wrote in post #8359896 I really like these. Great color and a nicely composed setting. The flowers really frame the shot well. Could use a bit of mid tone brightening but very nice work. Thank you very much. I liked them myself. I haven't shot birds much but it seems interesting. I didn't know if the fact that the flowers are so out of focus that they might not be recognizable. Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonloader Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 29, 2009 06:59 | #6 Nice shots. The flowers are fine, it's the bird people in the bird forum are interested in. Mitch- ____...^.^...____
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 29, 2009 20:46 | #7 canonloader wrote in post #8361815 Nice shots. The flowers are fine, it's the bird people in the bird forum are interested in. ![]() Would you say a picture of a given bird is as interesting on a feeder as it would be on a flower? Would the picture of the bird be as interesting virtually devoid of any scenery surrounding the bird? I have an opinion, I wondered what a person with your obvious experience thought about it. Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonloader Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 30, 2009 04:14 | #8 I think it depends on the bird and the circumstances. For me, the two shots above are very nice, artistic, but then, I know what a Carolina Wren looks like in great detail, because I had one stay a full winter here. But when I see pictures of Australian birds, I like to see the bird, as it would be shown in a book of birds. I am not interested in the background, just the look and details of the bird itself. Even better would be to see them in their habitat and up close. Mitch- ____...^.^...____
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 30, 2009 05:49 | #9 canonloader wrote in post #8367683 I think it depends on the bird and the circumstances. For me, the two shots above are very nice, artistic, but then, I know what a Carolina Wren looks like in great detail, because I had one stay a full winter here. But when I see pictures of Australian birds, I like to see the bird, as it would be shown in a book of birds. I am not interested in the background, just the look and details of the bird itself. Even better would be to see them in their habitat and up close. Feeder shots are not so well liked, however, there are some great behavioral shots I have seen of feeder action. I know people that will not take a shot of any bird if there is evidence of "the hand of man" in it. I think that way of thinking is stilted and designed to cut a lot of laughs and knowledge from your life. For instance, some birds have adapted to using barbed wire to hold their caught insects for later consumption, and I have seen some very cute shots of juvie birds trying to balance on a piece of wire. To not take the shot or scoff at it because it has a piece of wire in the frame is a little tightly wrapped for me. So the bird is the star of the show, whatever props he might use and I want a clear view of him most of the time. ![]() Thanks for the well thought out answer. Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 30, 2009 17:19 | #10 It may appear that the wren is standing on his bird house, when actually I built that bird house to install my surveillance camera in. Here is another. Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
patlannon Goldmember 3,752 posts Likes: 6 Joined Sep 2007 Location: West Seneca, NY More info | Jul 30, 2009 18:39 | #11 Cool setup, on the bird house, but getting back to the original posted photo i have to say it's a very well composed shot. Pat,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonloader Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 30, 2009 18:44 | #12 What kind of camera are you using in there? I am just about to put one up for my yard. Mitch- ____...^.^...____
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 30, 2009 19:25 | #13 canonloader wrote in post #8371781 What kind of camera are you using in there? I am just about to put one up for my yard. Canon 40D; 50 f1.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS L, 580 EX II, 1.4 TC, 24-70 f2.8 L, (2) 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 953 guests, 182 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||