Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 11 May 2005 (Wednesday) 22:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

My Brand New 70-200 2.8 IS has a speck of dust inside it. Should I send it back? Help

 
EricKonieczny
Senior Member
Avatar
675 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Outside Your window, with a Camera
     
May 11, 2005 22:28 |  #1

I got home tonight and unwrapped my brand new 70-200 2.8 IS and started inspecting it to make sure it was 100% fine before I even took a picture with it.

To my dismay, I noticed a speck of white dust inside the lense very noticible from the front. I couldn't believe my eyes. I looked closer to make sure it was under the glass and not on top but it looks to be inside the glass by the inside threads.

Should I immediatly send the lense back to BH and ask for a new one.
I am really disspapointed in Canon's qaulity control for a $1700 lense. I was already to test it out, but I haven't even mounted it on my 20D yet.

has anyone every had this problem?

It looks there is no alternative but to send it back.

Do you have any other suggestions?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


100% crop of above image

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


Another view

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

EKREATING photography - capture the feeling! (external link)
20D w/Grip|28-105 f3.5-4.5|70-200 f2.8L IS|10-22|580EX w/ ST-E2|Tripod 3021BPRO w/ 488RC2 Midi Ballhead & TC-80N3 Remote|Archos GMini 400|Tamrac Expedition 5



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
guitarman3
Goldmember
Avatar
2,052 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
     
May 11, 2005 23:13 |  #2

I'm no pro but I doubt the speck will affect the performance any. Trouble is you always will know it's there and that will bug the heck out of you (it would me anyway). And, if you ever sold it, you'd have to mention that in your description which would surely devalue it some. For $1700, I'd get a clean one although it would be tough to wait for the replacement to come. What a bummer! Sorry you had this trouble.


Dennis
40D and grip, black XT, EF 17-40L, EF 50mm 1.8 II, Canon 100-400L, Canon 1.4X, Sigma 1.4x TC, Canon 580EX, Canon RC-1 Remote, Stofen Omni Bounce, Manfrotto 681B w/ 486RC; 3021BPro w/ 488RC
http://dsdphotos.zenfo​lio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grego
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,819 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: UCLA
     
May 11, 2005 23:25 |  #3

Send it back if you think it will get to you, since you never used it and what not.


Go UCLA (external link)!! |Gear|http://gregburmann.com (external link)SportsShooter (external link)|Flickr (external link)|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Citizensmith
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,387 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
     
May 11, 2005 23:33 |  #4

They've all got specs of dust inside, its more a matter of if you can see them.

If it was a big speck wedged onto the glass I'd be tempted to say yes as it may occasionally cause flare that wouldn't have been present otherwise. Where that spec is though it will have absolutely no affect on your photos.

Oh yeah, and congrats on the new lens. Have fun.


My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
Tradition - Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sicily1918
Senior Member
Avatar
251 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
     
May 11, 2005 23:37 as a reply to  @ Citizensmith's post |  #5

You sure it's a speck? It looks like a white dot in the pics to me... anyone else?


Canon 50D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
Canon BG-E2 Battery Grip | Canon Speedlite 580EX and 420EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jackal
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Miami, FL
     
May 12, 2005 00:14 |  #6

He wouldn't have taken the picture of he didn't see the speck to begin with, Sicily. ;)

Congrats on the new lense. Even though it didn't come perfect. :p


5D+BGE4 | 30D+BGE2 | Canon 24-70mm 2.8L | Canon 28mm 1.8 | Sigma 10-20mm |Canon 50mm 1.4 | 580EX | 420EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DReb-MO
Senior Member
315 posts
Joined Apr 2004
     
May 12, 2005 05:35 |  #7

$1,700 for a "new" lens. No question. I'd send it back. If I am spending that kinda money on something that is near the top of the Canon lens food chain and it's not perfect, "see ya". I'd rather wait a week to switch lens's and be happy about what I bought than to look at that lens every time I shot and said darn, wish I would've.


Canon 40D w/BG-E2N & EP-EX15
70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 24-70mm f/2.8L, Extender 1.4x II, 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6, 50mm 1.8 II, Speedlite 550EX, Bogen 3221 Tripod & 3047 Head, Bogen 3245 Monopod & 3229 Head, Canon i9900

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ddelallata
Goldmember
Avatar
1,191 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Brownsville, Tx USA
     
May 12, 2005 05:42 |  #8

I bought a Canon lens with something similar to that speck about a year ago. Try this... With the camera mount pointing down and the lens at the highest zoom(200mm in your case), quickly twist the barrel back to 70mm a few times and hopefully the light impact will dislodge that little bugger. If that doesn't work just send it back.


Dr. David de la Llata
_____________
Canon 20D
BG-E2 Battery Grip
Canon SpeedLite 430 EX
Canon EF 1.4X II
Canon EF-S 10-22mm F/3.5-4.5 USM
Canon EF 50mm F/1.4 USM
Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 MACRO USM
Canon EF 24-70mm F/2.8 L USM
Canon EF 70-200mm F/2.8 L USM
Olympus C-2020 (for infrared work)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MAD ­ DOG
Member
231 posts
Joined May 2005
     
May 12, 2005 06:34 as a reply to  @ ddelallata's post |  #9

My 70-200 f4 has just arrived this morning and it has no such marks.

Like everyone else I doubt it will affect the images, but it is going to annoy the hell out of you. I know it would me.

You'll never feel 100% happy with it, so bight the bullet and send it back.

As also stated, it could affect any future re-sale value.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EricKonieczny
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
675 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Outside Your window, with a Camera
     
May 12, 2005 07:26 |  #10

I guess my question is, will the dirt/ speck show up on all images I take?

I don't want to have to edit every dang picture for a blurry spot.


If i look straight into the lens from the wide end. The spot looks to be inbetween the first two pieces of UD glass (seen in green in the illustration below). Or right after the 2nd peiace of glass and third piece. It is hard to tell. But the speck is not sitting on the side completely, it is on the glass. It is hard to tell from the angle of the shots above.

IMAGE: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/images/ef_70-200_28isx.gif

This is from Canon's website: The 70~200mm f/2.8L IS uses 23 elements, four of which utilize UD glass (seen in green in the illustration below). It features a rubber lens mount gasket making for a very water and dust-proof seal when used with either an EOS-1V or 1D.

EKREATING photography - capture the feeling! (external link)
20D w/Grip|28-105 f3.5-4.5|70-200 f2.8L IS|10-22|580EX w/ ST-E2|Tripod 3021BPRO w/ 488RC2 Midi Ballhead & TC-80N3 Remote|Archos GMini 400|Tamrac Expedition 5



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdhender
Senior Member
Avatar
547 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
     
May 12, 2005 07:43 |  #11

If you can stand the wait, send it back. For $1700 I would expect it to be perfect.


Chris

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kb244
Senior Member
766 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
     
May 12, 2005 12:07 |  #12

Well heres the thing that concerns me from reading this, it is my understanding that the White L Glass, as supposed to be weather sealed, especially when placed on the right body (1D, etc) , so things like dust, rain, sand, etc are not supposed to even make it inside the lens, unless of course you leave the back cap off and let things creep up inside the back. But it's been my experience that every zoom will get something inside of them just a matter of time, but for one of the L Glass thats supposibly weather sealed, I would think even brand new shouldnt have a thing in there. Its quite possible due to the bright white of the speck that it was maybe peice off an antistatic cloth or something else, when being assembled. But ya if B&H will take it back by all means, but if not I wouldnt be raising all hell about it, especially if its a loose peice it'll probally change position to a hidden portion of the lens.


-Karl Blessing
PHP/MySQL Webdeveloper & Photographer.
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slin100
Senior Member
976 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Cupertino, CA
     
May 12, 2005 12:18 |  #13

Dust specks seldom have any visible effect in images. A speck that far out from the center of the glass is not going to be a problem. Nevertheless, I would probably send it back.


Steven
7D, 10D, 17-40/4L, 50/1.8 Mk I, 85/1.8, Tamron 28-75/2.8, 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS, 80-200/2.8L, 550EX, Pocket Wizard

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paulhillion
Goldmember
Avatar
1,392 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Guernsey, UK
     
May 12, 2005 12:32 as a reply to  @ slin100's post |  #14

I had a similar problem with my first 70-200, sent it straight back & got a replacement.


Website: Click (external link)
Twitter: Click (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steibeldj
Member
Avatar
188 posts
Joined Mar 2005
     
May 12, 2005 12:36 |  #15

It should be in a box on the way to UPS right now!:mad:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,482 views & 0 likes for this thread, 23 members have posted to it.
My Brand New 70-200 2.8 IS has a speck of dust inside it. Should I send it back? Help
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1200 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.