It's very difficult to resist once you had a taste...
JelleVerherstraeten Goldmember 2,440 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Antwerp, Belgium More info | Aug 01, 2009 08:24 | #31 |
willz75 Senior Member 449 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Darwin, Australia More info | Aug 01, 2009 10:00 | #32 At least us addicts aren't alone, more and more people are joining this exclusive club lol... 1D Mark IV | 5D Mark II | Lots of L Glass
LOG IN TO REPLY |
clint0914 Member 188 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada More info | Aug 01, 2009 10:14 | #33 Curtis N wrote in post #8376766 Ignorance is bliss. For years, I have been happily running around with my Sigma and Tamron lenses, taking pictures and thinking my glass was pretty good. I mean, they're a little soft wide open, but every lens is like that, right? Why pay more for the fancy Canon name brand and the red ring when this aftermarket glass makes perfectly fine pictures? L glass is a waste of money, I say! Then my wife bought a 100-400L. And I used it a little. And I quickly came to an undeniable conclusion: L glass kicks ass. Detail, color, contrast... holy MTF charts, batman! This thing is in a different league than Sigma & Tamron. And image stabilization opens up new possibilities, too. I went through the process of calibrating all my lenses with the AF microadjustment feature of the 1D Mk III. The Sigma & Tamrons all needed some tweaking (little wonder the Sigma 70-200 rarely focused correctly on my 20D). The 100-400L was bang-on. No tweaking required. Now recently my wife nagged me until I relented and approved the purchase of a 24-70L (She says it's her lens. She's in for a rude awaking on that.). First thing I did was take some comparison shots using it and my Tamron 28-75. Which confirmed my earlier conclusion: L glass kicks ass. So now I'm looking at the picture of the EF 70-200 F2.8L IS on the B&H website, drooling like some kid with his nose pressed against the toy store window, wondering how I'm going to resist the urge to drop another $1,700 and put my Sigma days behind me. The problem is, that won't be the end of it. Next, I'll "need" a 17-40 too. And God knows what else. Maybe an 85L or the whole blessed holy trinity of primes. Or maybe something long and fast like a 300 f/2.8 Pity me. I have ventured down a path with no return that will suck me dry. I will die broke, and my kin will have to sell my gear to pay for my funeral. LOL! Classic L fever!! hahahaha.. 1Ds Mk II |50D + Grip | 16-35L | 28-70 2.8L | 24-105L IS | 50L | 135L | 70-200 2.8L IS | |Canon TC 1.4x II | 580EXII | 430EXII | "In a perfect world, we would all be using full frame and primes."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
doublehmom Senior Member 983 posts Joined Jan 2009 More info | Aug 01, 2009 10:24 | #34 I hear ya~I have a 1000.00 cc bill waiting to be paid. Love the L lenses!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
clint0914 Member 188 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada More info | Aug 01, 2009 10:24 | #35 david.moreno wrote in post #8379516 The only cure to L disease is to get them all. I thought I kicked it when I had all the L zooms, but then you want all the primes as well. My first L prime was the 85 II, now I want the 50, 35 and 24. 50L is just super sweet!!! I can't imagine mounting another 50mm glass on my body since I got it and infact that is all I mount on my 1Ds2 whenever I walk around. No bags no nothing, they are both weather sealed but I am not LOL! 1Ds Mk II |50D + Grip | 16-35L | 28-70 2.8L | 24-105L IS | 50L | 135L | 70-200 2.8L IS | |Canon TC 1.4x II | 580EXII | 430EXII | "In a perfect world, we would all be using full frame and primes."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Raikiri Senior Member 293 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | Aug 01, 2009 10:28 | #36 I'm with you. I just bought my first L and already I'm eying up my student loan... Canon 500D - Sigma 30mm f1.4 -Canon 85mm f1.8 - Tamron 90mm f2.8 - Canon 50mm f1.8 - Sigma 10-20mm - Redsnapper Tripod
LOG IN TO REPLY |
l33_garf Member 98 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Midlands UK More info | Aug 01, 2009 11:08 | #37 was just about to post something very similar, it all started with the 24-105, then the 100-400, had a slight relapse into the realms of the non L normality with a 11-16 tok, Before you critisise someone, walk a mile in their shoes...... At least then you are a mile away and have their shoes!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Raikiri Senior Member 293 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | Aug 01, 2009 11:47 | #38 l33_garf wrote in post #8380759 is there a cure? Yep, cold turkey. No time to sell anything, just post the lenses to me. You'll be less tempted to go out and buy more if you don't have the money anyway Canon 500D - Sigma 30mm f1.4 -Canon 85mm f1.8 - Tamron 90mm f2.8 - Canon 50mm f1.8 - Sigma 10-20mm - Redsnapper Tripod
LOG IN TO REPLY |
irishman Goldmember 4,098 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Aug 01, 2009 15:17 | #39 Geez, Curtis. You've been around here so long I can't believe its taken you this long to get the bug. Your "L" immunity must have been strong! 6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Analog6 Senior Member 565 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Terranora, northern NSW, Australia More info | Aug 01, 2009 15:44 | #40 I've had DSLRs since Nov 2005 but have only just had the $$ to get into L lenses. In quick succession I have bought 100-400L, then on impulse the 70-200 f4; then 24-105 (from here, thanks cartha, it's a beauty) and I also have coming from here a 10-20 - not L but I'm sure it will be fine glass. I may have some things to sell in the near future, I think! Odille
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rooeey -Shorty- 2,554 posts Likes: 5 Joined May 2007 Location: Sydney Australia More info | Aug 01, 2009 15:52 | #41 LightRules wrote in post #8376815 Well we might as well help the man out and encourage him in his new found passions:
There, now doesn't that feel better? ![]() I find these images strangley arousing i can't stop looking at them...I need help........L for lust 1D MK111 , 5D Classic,24-70F2.8, 16-35F2.8, 70-200F2.8 IS a 430EXII 2x 580EXII and a Mac...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wickerprints "Shooting blanks" 864 posts Joined Jul 2009 More info | Aug 01, 2009 15:58 | #42 rooeey wrote in post #8381841 I find these images strangley arousing i can't stop looking at them...I need help........L for lust I am very, very concerned for your sanity. 5DmkII :: EF 24-105/4L IS :: EF 85/1.8 :: EF 70-200/2.8L IS :: EF 100/2.8L IS macro (coming soon!)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shaftmaster Goldmember 1,429 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: above 5000 feet More info | Aug 01, 2009 16:02 | #43 |
zaathrus Pole Dancin' Hamster 914 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2009 More info | Aug 01, 2009 16:02 | #44 |
rooeey -Shorty- 2,554 posts Likes: 5 Joined May 2007 Location: Sydney Australia More info | Aug 01, 2009 16:40 | #45 Don't be i don't have any.... 1D MK111 , 5D Classic,24-70F2.8, 16-35F2.8, 70-200F2.8 IS a 430EXII 2x 580EXII and a Mac...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is johntmyers418 645 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||