Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
Thread started 04 Aug 2009 (Tuesday) 00:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Yellowstone Wildlife

 
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8390
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Aug 13, 2009 18:31 |  #31

wiked03 wrote in post #8446574 (external link)
I was in yellowstone years ago and we saw nothing but bison the whole time. :(

Yeah, it used to be like that . . . Bison and Elk, with perhaps a slim chance at a Black Bear. I remember back in '95 being there an entire week and only seeing one bear - a Black Bear. Same in '97 - whole week, only one bear. We'd hear so many people complaining that all they wanted to see was a bear, and that they hadn't seen one the whole week they were there.

Not like that anymore! In my experience, bears are now much more commonly seen, with the Grizzlies being seen just as frequently as the blacks. Coyotes are more often seen (at least the habituated ones that let you get close). Bighorn Sheep also seem to be more regularly seen at close range. And now we have the wolves, too.

The only thing that seems to be harder to see are elk. The huge trophy class bulls that used to live along the roadsides back in the 90's just aren't seen anymore. Sure, if you drive around enough you can see some mature 6x6 bulls, but they're nothing like the enormous 400" trophy bulls that used to hang around and let you get close.

Overall, the park is simply a better place to see wildlife than it was 10 or 20 years ago.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BillwYellowstone
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: R\Fulltime RV-er Currently in Yellowstone NP
     
Aug 28, 2009 10:21 |  #32

Did you get that coyote on the drive out to West Yellowstone? I have a similar, (not anywhere near as near, or good), back in July in that area. Just across river from road.
Great shots!


Bill W Yellowstone retired
Gripped Canon 5DMklll 24-105 Sigma ART 24 & 50 Tamrom 150-600
AZ for the Winter!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scrawford
Member
Avatar
73 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Indiana
     
Aug 28, 2009 15:51 |  #33

love the bear pictures!


Canon 40D | ∑ 18-50mm 2.8 | Canon 50mm 1.8 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
palmor
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
959 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2009
Location: North of Boston, MA
     
Aug 28, 2009 20:29 |  #34

BillwYellowstone wrote in post #8538384 (external link)
Did you get that coyote on the drive out to West Yellowstone? I have a similar, (not anywhere near as near, or good), back in July in that area. Just across river from road.
Great shots!

It was right at the intersection of the West Entrance Rd and the Grand Loop Road On July 3rd. Wouldn't it be funny if it was the same one (on the same day even!)?

John


John
http://pbase.com/palmo​r (external link)
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/johnw_trishw[/​URL (external link)
http://johnwoolleyphot​ography.com (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EveryMilesAMemory
Goldmember
Avatar
3,950 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 3534
Joined May 2007
Location: Cedar Key Florida
     
Aug 28, 2009 21:51 |  #35

Tom Reichner wrote in post #8455372 (external link)
Yeah, it used to be like that . . . Bison and Elk, with perhaps a slim chance at a Black Bear. I remember back in '95 being there an entire week and only seeing one bear - a Black Bear. Same in '97 - whole week, only one bear. We'd hear so many people complaining that all they wanted to see was a bear, and that they hadn't seen one the whole week they were there

I think the main problem is most people visit in Mid-July through August. This has to be the worst time to see wildlife.

When we were in the park during the month of June, it was hard to drive anywhere and not see wildlife around every corner.

By mid-July when the temperatures were getting warm, we could drive the park for days straight and only see a few lone bison.

Starting last week, it was like someone opened up a gate and let the animals back out.

It also frosted up a few days last week and the temperatures have been getting pretty cold during the nights which brings the animals back down out of the elevations.

I'd recommend if you're visiting the park for wildlife photos, plan you visit as early or as late as possible. This gives you the best opportunity to get outstanding shots like Palmor did.

I mean these are all Magazine quality shots but ones you wouldnt have been able to get during the main visiting season when 90% of the tourists come to see the animals???


Pat Bonish
www.everymilesamemory.​com (external link)
www.patbonishphotograp​hy.com (external link)
http://www.instagram.c​om/bonish_photo/[/URL (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike55
Goldmember
Avatar
4,206 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Aug 29, 2009 01:02 |  #36

Tom Reichner wrote in post #8455372 (external link)
Yeah, it used to be like that . . . Bison and Elk, with perhaps a slim chance at a Black Bear. I remember back in '95 being there an entire week and only seeing one bear - a Black Bear. Same in '97 - whole week, only one bear. We'd hear so many people complaining that all they wanted to see was a bear, and that they hadn't seen one the whole week they were there.

Not like that anymore! In my experience, bears are now much more commonly seen, with the Grizzlies being seen just as frequently as the blacks. Coyotes are more often seen (at least the habituated ones that let you get close). Bighorn Sheep also seem to be more regularly seen at close range. And now we have the wolves, too.

In 1968, Yellowstone decided to close down the garbage dumps where grizzly and black bears were allowed to feed. Against the advice of grizzly research pioneers the Craigheads, the Park Service closed the dumps immediately rather than tapering off. The dumps were closed in part as a fast reaction to the famous Glacier NP grizzly deaths of 1967(which were also bears that ate garbage). There were liability concerns.

By 1975, there were around 150 grizzly bears in Yellowstone. Closing the dumps essentially cut off a source of food and the population crashed. At this point, the feds intervened and placed the grizzly bear as threatened under the very new endangered species act. This protection essentially allowed the bears to recover over the next 35 years. How did they recover? Well ,the designation banned ranchers from shooting them on sight. It made timber and oil companies have to jump through several hurdles on bordering national forest land. Grazing allotments were phased out around the park to give the bears room to roam. This essentially alowed the bears to not only repopulate Yellowstone park, but the very rich grizzly habitat which surrounds the park in national forest land (the Shoshone, Gallatin, Bridger-Teton). A 6 month jail sentence and 25,000 fine for killing a grizz didn't hurt either. ;)

That is why you see more now than you did twenty years ago. Currently there are around 500-700 grizzly bears in the Yellowstone ecosystem, which is a far cry from 150 or so in 1975. If it wasn't for the Endangered Species Act we wouldn't be talking about Yellowstone grizzlies today. Fortunately the population crash of the 70's did not harm genetic diversity too badly.


6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
Gallatin National Forest, Montana (external link)/Lassen Volcanic NP Campgrounds (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike55
Goldmember
Avatar
4,206 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Aug 29, 2009 01:17 |  #37

palmor wrote in post #8394872 (external link)
QUOTED IMAGE

I've seen that grizz. He loves Dunraven. Nice job.


6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
Gallatin National Forest, Montana (external link)/Lassen Volcanic NP Campgrounds (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BillwYellowstone
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: R\Fulltime RV-er Currently in Yellowstone NP
     
Aug 29, 2009 07:54 |  #38

palmor wrote in post #8541594 (external link)
It was right at the intersection of the West Entrance Rd and the Grand Loop Road On July 3rd. Wouldn't it be funny if it was the same one (on the same day even!)?


John

Mine was July 9th, just west of where you got him. I would post the picture but it wasn't from a Canon. Same color coyote. Likely same one.


Bill W Yellowstone retired
Gripped Canon 5DMklll 24-105 Sigma ART 24 & 50 Tamrom 150-600
AZ for the Winter!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
palmor
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
959 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2009
Location: North of Boston, MA
     
Aug 29, 2009 08:37 |  #39

BillwYellowstone wrote in post #8543460 (external link)
Mine was July 9th, just west of where you got him. I would post the picture but it wasn't from a Canon. Same color coyote. Likely same one.

Post away! I doesn't matter if it wasn't shot from a Canon. I have an entire thread of "Yellowstone Weather" that was shot with my Pentax: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=733191. :)


John
http://pbase.com/palmo​r (external link)
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/johnw_trishw[/​URL (external link)
http://johnwoolleyphot​ography.com (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
palmor
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
959 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2009
Location: North of Boston, MA
     
Aug 29, 2009 08:42 as a reply to  @ palmor's post |  #40

scrawford wrote in post #8540328 (external link)
love the bear pictures!

Thanks!

EveryMilesAMemory wrote in post #8541965 (external link)
I think the main problem is most people visit in Mid-July through August. This has to be the worst time to see wildlife.

When we were in the park during the month of June, it was hard to drive anywhere and not see wildlife around every corner.

By mid-July when the temperatures were getting warm, we could drive the park for days straight and only see a few lone bison.

Starting last week, it was like someone opened up a gate and let the animals back out.

It also frosted up a few days last week and the temperatures have been getting pretty cold during the nights which brings the animals back down out of the elevations.

I'd recommend if you're visiting the park for wildlife photos, plan you visit as early or as late as possible. This gives you the best opportunity to get outstanding shots like Palmor did.

I mean these are all Magazine quality shots but ones you wouldnt have been able to get during the main visiting season when 90% of the tourists come to see the animals???

Thanks! I think part of our luck was that I guess it was a cold July.. night temps getting down into the 30s. We also would wake up at sunset and stay out past sun down. Another thing is that we always talked to people and asked what they had been seeing (visitors, workers, rangers ect).

Mike55 wrote in post #8542771 (external link)
I've seen that grizz. He loves Dunraven. Nice job.

Thanks Mike, and also nice history lesson there with regards to the bears. That was something I didn't know!


John
http://pbase.com/palmo​r (external link)
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/johnw_trishw[/​URL (external link)
http://johnwoolleyphot​ography.com (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aeronos
Member
37 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
Location: East Bay, CA
     
Aug 29, 2009 12:17 |  #41

Wow, I also live the shot of the grizzly on the hill. It seems to get the real stellar shots you gotta have a 400mm lens. I was shooting with a 200 and didn't stand a chance to get the shots you've gotten here. Awesome stuff.


Canon XSi | Canon 17-40mm F4.0L | Canon 70-200 F4.0L IS | Canon 50mm F1.8 | Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 EX DG Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BillwYellowstone
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: R\Fulltime RV-er Currently in Yellowstone NP
     
Aug 29, 2009 22:33 as a reply to  @ aeronos's post |  #42

Post away! I doesn't matter if it wasn't shot from a Canon.

Thought it was outside the rules. I'll get it and move it in. If nothing else it will further our resolve to get good equipment.

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

Bill W Yellowstone retired
Gripped Canon 5DMklll 24-105 Sigma ART 24 & 50 Tamrom 150-600
AZ for the Winter!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
reewik
Goldmember
Avatar
2,657 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Lavergne, TN
     
Aug 29, 2009 23:07 |  #43

Stunning captures!


Eric: www.avianart.net (external link)
Canon 1D MKIII, 600 f4 IS, 85 1.2L
Canon 1D (Classic),50 2.5 Macro, 1x lifesize

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigcountry
Goldmember
Avatar
4,519 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 151
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Aug 30, 2009 01:22 |  #44

i was there for one day and did not see any grizzlies, i am very jealous.


Louisville Kentucky Wedding Photographer (external link)
Travel the World and Photograph (external link)
Find me on Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BillwYellowstone
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: R\Fulltime RV-er Currently in Yellowstone NP
     
Aug 30, 2009 10:01 |  #45

One day. we have a saying in the visitor center when asked what a visitor should do with one day. Point out a bench, tell him to sit there and cry, because he only has one day.


Bill W Yellowstone retired
Gripped Canon 5DMklll 24-105 Sigma ART 24 & 50 Tamrom 150-600
AZ for the Winter!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,889 views & 0 likes for this thread, 33 members have posted to it.
Yellowstone Wildlife
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2880 guests, 143 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.