Firefox 3.5.2 is out...
Images with ICC profiles now render properly on all monitors.
Did this fix the profile issue for anyone? I'm no longer using a v4 profile so I haven't had the problem for a while now.
Aug 04, 2009 09:13 | #1 Firefox 3.5.2 is out... Images with ICC profiles now render properly on all monitors. Did this fix the profile issue for anyone? I'm no longer using a v4 profile so I haven't had the problem for a while now. R6 Mark II ☼ 35L ☼ 70-200 2.8L IS II ☼ 580EX II ☼ 1.4x extender III ☼ RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM ☼ RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PixelMagic Cream of the Crop 5,546 posts Likes: 6 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Racine, WI More info | Aug 04, 2009 10:30 | #2 I have the same question. I use ColorEyes Display Pro to create ICC v2 profiles but if I'm sure this issue is now fixed I can go ahead and use v4 profiles instead.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop  39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Aug 04, 2009 10:48 | #3 As far as I can tell, it still doesn't work properly with my monitor profile... (Table based): I see a difference between FF 3.5.2 and Flock 2.5 with color management add on. "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 04, 2009 10:55 | #4 Wow... they just can't get this right can they? R6 Mark II ☼ 35L ☼ 70-200 2.8L IS II ☼ 580EX II ☼ 1.4x extender III ☼ RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM ☼ RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jcrompton Junior Member 27 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Richboro, PA More info | Aug 04, 2009 12:33 | #5 RacingThoughts wrote in post #8397024  Wow... they just can't get this right can they? If you load the pdf on the test page it looks to me like all four types are supported. Maybe I am doinf something wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 04, 2009 12:44 | #6 The image in the PDF displays correctly for me, but the image on the html page does not. This is on my work machine, uncalibrated. R6 Mark II ☼ 35L ☼ 70-200 2.8L IS II ☼ 580EX II ☼ 1.4x extender III ☼ RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM ☼ RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
basroil Cream of the Crop  8,015 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2006 Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ More info | Aug 04, 2009 14:19 | #7 Firefox doesn't yet support v4 profiles, but they somewhat fixed the wide gamut monitor issue (good monitors displayed really dark images). Now the saturation is still somewhat suspect, but the brightness is about right, maybe 1/3rd stop darker than it should be. I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FF 3.5.2, Wide Gamut -------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
basroil Cream of the Crop 8,015 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2006 Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ More info | Aug 04, 2009 21:44 | #9 bunyarra wrote in post #8398852 Argg ... this whole thing is a regression from 3.5.0. the only alternative is Safari and I do so hate that. I know there is an issue with the cms module and v4 ICC monitor profiles but this is daft. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497363 So many now use wide gamut that I think it must have greater priority than OS/2 bug fixes (coming from a certified OS/2 engineer as well!)  Some are, however,reporting it is fine - anyone here tested it on a Dell 2408 yet? I speak for the 2408WFP (above), v2 profiles work fairly well, but still shows some of the darkening that was a large issue in 3.5.1. v4 profiles of course do not work. I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1607 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
